We partner with a secure submission system to handle manuscript submissions.
Please note:
You will need an account for the submission system, which is separate to your Cambridge Core account. For login and submission support, please visit the
submission and support pages.
Please review this journal's author instructions, particularly the
preparing your materials
page, before submitting your manuscript.
Click Proceed to submission system to continue to our partner's website.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The λ-dilate of a set A is λċA={λa : a∈A}. We give an asymptotically sharp lower bound on the size of sumsets of the form λ1ċA+ċċċ+λkċA for arbitrary integers λ1,. . .,λk and integer sets A. We also establish an upper bound for such sums, which is similar to, but often stronger than Plünnecke's inequality.
We consider the problem of minimizing the size of a family of sets such that every subset of {1,. . ., n} can be written as a disjoint union of at most k members of , where k and n are given numbers. This problem originates in a real-world application aiming at the diversity of industrial production. At the same time, the question of finding the minimum of || so that every subset of {1,. . ., n} is the union of two sets in was asked by Erdős and studied recently by Füredi and Katona without requiring the disjointness of the sets. A simple construction providing a feasible solution is conjectured to be optimal for this problem for all values of n and k and regardless of the disjointness requirement; we prove this conjecture in special cases including all (n, k) for which n≤3k holds, and some individual values of n and k.
We study the number of subtrees on the fringe of random recursive trees and random binary search trees whose limit law is known to be either normal or Poisson or degenerate depending on the size of the subtree. We introduce a new approach to this problem which helps us to further clarify this phenomenon. More precisely, we derive optimal Berry–Esseen bounds and local limit theorems for the normal range and prove a Poisson approximation result as the subtree size tends to infinity.
Let n ≥ 1 be an integer. Given a vector a=(a1,. . ,an)∈, write(the ‘projection of a onto the positive orthant’). For a set A⊆ put A+:={a+: a ∈ A} and A−A:={a−b: a, b ∈ A}. Improving previously known bounds, we show that |(A−A)+| ≥ |A|3/5/6 for any finite set A⊆, and that |(A−A)+| ≥ c|A|6/11/(log |A|)2/11 with an absolute constant c>0 for any finite set A⊆ such that |A| ≥ 2.
We show that for each α>0 every sufficiently large oriented graph G with δ+(G), δ−(G)≥3|G|/8+α|G| contains a Hamilton cycle. This gives an approximate solution to a problem of Thomassen [21]. In fact, we prove the stronger result that G is still Hamiltonian if δ(G)+δ+(G)+δ−(G)≥3|G|/2 + α|G|. Up to the term α|G|, this confirms a conjecture of Häggkvist [10]. We also prove an Ore-type theorem for oriented graphs.
The number of spanning trees in the giant component of the random graph (n, c/n) (c > 1) grows like exp{m(f(c)+o(1))} as n → ∞, where m is the number of vertices in the giant component. The function f is not known explicitly, but we show that it is strictly increasing and infinitely differentiable. Moreover, we give an explicit lower bound on f′(c). A key lemma is the following. Let PGW(λ) denote a Galton–Watson tree having Poisson offspring distribution with parameter λ. Suppose that λ*>λ>1. We show that PGW(λ*) conditioned to survive forever stochastically dominates PGW(λ) conditioned to survive forever.