This journal utilises an Online Peer Review Service (OPRS) for submissions. By clicking "Continue" you will be taken to our partner site
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ch-research.
Please be aware that your Cambridge account is not valid for this OPRS and registration is required. We strongly advise you to read all "Author instructions" in the "Journal information" area prior to submitting.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Relationships between characters are not just themes in a story but key elements that shape how plots unfold. This article presents a large-scale study of relational arcs, the trajectories of ties, such as kinship, romance, alliance and enmity as they rise and fall across the course of a novel. We build on the Artificial Relationships in Fiction dataset, which contains over 120,000 automatically annotated relationships from 96 novels published between 1850 and 1950. Our study makes four contributions. First, we show that relationship dynamics can be modeled as arcs that highlight recurring narrative patterns, such as conflicts peaking near the climax or romances resolving toward the end. Second, we use temporal normalization to compare books of very different lengths, allowing us to identify consistent trends across the corpus. Third, we demonstrate that genres and historical periods leave clear relational “fingerprints.” For instance, domestic fiction emphasizes family ties, while adventure stories highlight shifting alliances and adversaries. Finally, we cluster arcs into four common shapes (Rise, U-shape, Decline and Oscillating) that echo well-known narrative prototypes. By bringing narratology together with modern natural language processing, we argue that relationships provide a measurable grammar of plot. This approach offers new resources for literary analysis, new methods for computational modeling of narrative, and fresh evidence about how cultural storytelling patterns change over time.