Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T22:49:04.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemic risk and insurance coverage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Claude Lefèvre*
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Philippe Picard*
Affiliation:
Université de Lyon
Matthieu Simon*
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
*
* Postal address: Département de Mathématique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus de la Plaine C.P. 210, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
*** Postal address: ISFA, Université de Lyon, 50 Avenue Tony Garnier, F-69007 Lyon, France. Email address: philippe.picard69@free.fr
* Postal address: Département de Mathématique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus de la Plaine C.P. 210, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we aim to apply simple actuarial methods to build an insurance plan protecting against an epidemic risk in a population. The studied model is an extended SIR epidemic in which the removal and infection rates may depend on the number of registered removals. The costs due to the epidemic are measured through the expected epidemic size and infectivity time. The premiums received during the epidemic outbreak are measured through the expected susceptibility time. Using martingale arguments, a method by recursion is developed to calculate the cost components and the corresponding premium levels in this extended epidemic model. Some numerical examples illustrate the effect of removals and the premium calculation in an insurance plan.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2017 

References

Andersson, H. and Britton, T. (2000).Stochastic Epidemic Models and Their Statistical Analysis, (Lecture Notes Statist. 151).Springer,New York.Google Scholar
Ball, F. and O’Neill, P. D. (1993).A modification of the general stochastic epidemic motivated by AIDS modelling.Adv. Appl. Prob. 25,3962.Google Scholar
Ball, F., O’Neill, P. D. and Pike, J. (2007).Stochastic epidemic models in structured populations featuring dynamic vaccination and isolation.J. Appl. Prob. 44,571585.Google Scholar
Ball, F. G. (1986).A unified approach to the distribution of total size and total area under the trajectory of infectives in epidemic models.Adv. Appl. Prob. 18,289310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, F. G., Knock, E. S. and O’Neill, P. D. (2008).Control of emerging infectious diseases using responsive imperfect vaccination and isolation.Math. Biosci. 216,100113.Google Scholar
Chen, H. and Cox, S. H. (2009).An option-based operational risk management model for pandemics.N. Amer. Actuarial J. 13,5479.Google Scholar
Daley, D. and Gani, J. (1999).Epidemic Modelling.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denuit, M. and Robert, C. (2007).Actuariat des Assurances de Personnes.Economica,Paris.Google Scholar
Feng, R. and Garrido, J. (2011).Actuarial applications of epidemiological models.N. Amer. Actuarial J. 15,112136.Google Scholar
Gani, J. and Jerwood, D. (1972).The cost of a general stochastic epidemic.J. Appl. Prob. 9,257269.Google Scholar
Gleissner, W. (1988).The spread of epidemics.Appl. Math. Comput. 27,167171.Google Scholar
Haberman, S. and Pitacco, E. (1999).Actuarial Models for Disability Insurance,Chapman and Hall,Boca Raton.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. D. (1997).An epidemic model with removal-dependent infection rate.Ann. Appl. Prob. 7,90109.Google Scholar
Picard, P. (1980).Applications of martingale theory to some epidemic models.J. Appl. Prob. 17,583599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, P. and Lefèvre, C. (1990).A unified analysis of the final size and severity distribution in collective Reed–Frost epidemic processes.Adv. Appl. Prob. 22,269294.Google Scholar
Picard, P. and Lefèvre, C. (1993).Distribution of the final state and severity of epidemics with fatal risk.Stoch. Process. Appl. 48,277294.Google Scholar