Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:21:49.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A machine-learning history of English caselaw and legal ideas prior to the Industrial Revolution II: applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2020

Peter Grajzl  and
Peter Murrell
Peter Grajzl
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, The Williams School of Commerce, Economics, and Politics, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA, USA CESifo, Munich, Germany
Peter Murrell*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD20742, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: pmurrell@umd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is the second of two papers that generate and analyze quantitative estimates of the development of English caselaw and associated legal ideas before the Industrial Revolution. In the first paper, we estimated a 100-topic structural topic model, named the topics, and showed how to interpret topic-prevalence timelines. Here, we provide examples of new insights that can be gained from these estimates. We first provide a bird's-eye view, aggregating the topics into 15 themes. Procedure is the highest-prevalence theme, but by the mid-18th century attention to procedure decreases sharply, indicating solidification of court institutions. Important ideas on real-property were substantially settled by the mid-17th century and on contracts and torts by the mid-18th century. Thus, crucial elements of caselaw developed before the Industrial Revolution. We then examine the legal ideas associated with England's financial revolution. Many new legal ideas relevant to finance were well accepted before the Glorious Revolution. Finally, we examine the sources of law used in the courts. Emphasis on precedent-based reasoning increases by 1650, but diffusion was gradual, with pertinent ideas solidifying only after 1700. Ideas on statute applicability were accepted by the mid-16th century but debates on legislative intent were still occurring in 1750.

Keywords

CaselawEnglish historyfinancial revolutioninstitutional developmentsources of lawC80N00K10K43O43
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 201 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D and Robinson, J. A. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York, NY: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Allen, C. K. (1964), Law in the Making (7th edn), Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. (1979), ‘The Law Merchant and the Common Law Before 1700’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 38(2): 295–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. H. (2019), An Introduction to English Legal History (5th edn), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogart, D. and Richardson, G. (2011), ‘Property Rights and Parliament in Industrializing Britain’, Journal of Law and Economics, 54(2): 241–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, B. G. (1999), City of Capital: Politics and Markets in the English Financial Revolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coffman, D. (2013), ‘Credibility, Transparency, Accountability, and the Public Credit under the Long Parliament and Commonwealth, 1643–1653’, in Coffman, D., Leonard, A. and Neal, L. (eds.), Questioning Credible Commitment: Perspectives on the Rise of Financial Capitalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 76–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, W. R. (1994), ‘The Somerset Case and the Abolition of Slavery in England’, History, 79(255): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxbury, N. (2008), The Nature and Authority of Precedent, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, P. and Murrell, P. (2020) A Machine-Learning History of English Caselaw and Legal Ideas Prior to the Industrial Revolution I: Generating and Interpreting the Estimates. Journal of Institutional Economics 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. C. (1921), Nature and Sources of the Law, New York, NY: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1946), ‘The Development of Doctrine of Stare Decisis and the Extent to Which It Should Be Applied’, Illinois Law Review, 40(3): 303–321Google Scholar
Harding, A. (1973), A Social History of English Law, Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2013), ‘Could the Crown Credibly Commit to Respect Its Charters? England 1558–1640’, in Coffman, D., Leonard, A. and Neal, L. (eds.), Questioning Credible Commitment: Perspectives on the Rise of Financial Capitalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, T. (2001), ‘Stare Decisis as a Constitutional Requirement’, West Virginia Law Review, 104(1): 43–121.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2017), ‘1688 and All That: Property Rights, the Glorious Revolution and the Rise of British Capitalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1): 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S. (1934), 'Case Law’, Law Quarterly Review, 50(2): 180–195.Google Scholar
Hoppit, J. (1996), ‘Patterns of Parliamentary Legislation, 1660–1800’, The Historical Journal, 39(1): 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppit, J. (2011), ‘Compulsion, Compensation and Property Rights in Britain, 1688–1833’, Past and Present, 210(1): 93–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppit, J. (2017), Britain's Political Economies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, E. (1938), A Short History of English Law (5th edn), London, UK: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Kiralfy, A. K. R. (1962), Potter's Historical Introduction to English Law and Its Institutions (4th edn), London, UK: Sweet & Maxwell Limited.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. E. (1930 a), ‘The History of Judicial Precedent, Part I’, Law Quarterly Review, 46(2): 207–224.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. E. (1930 b), ‘The History of Judicial Precedent, Part II’, Law Quarterly Review, 46(3): 341–360.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. E. (1931), ‘The History of Judicial Precedent, Part III’, Law Quarterly Review, 47(3): 411–427.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. E. (1932), ‘The History of Judicial Precedent, Part IV’, Law Quarterly Review, 48(2): 230–247.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. (1989), The Province of Legislation Determined. Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobban, M. (1991), The Common Law and English Jurisprudence, 1760–1850, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. and Montague, F. C. (1915), A Sketch of English Legal History, New York, NY: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
McSweeney, T. (2012), ‘English Judges and Roman Jurists: The Civilian Learning Behind England's First Case Law’, Temple Law Review, 84(4): 827–862.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2008), ‘The Institutional Origins of the Industrial Revolution’, in E. Helpman, (ed.), Institutions and Economic Performance, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 64–119.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. L. (2009), The Origins of the English Financial Markets: Investment and Speculation Before the South Sea Bubble, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murrell, P. (2017), ‘Design and Evolution in Institutional Development: The Insignificance of the English Bill of Rights’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1): 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musson, A. (2013), ‘Arbitration and the Legal Profession in Late Medieval England’, in Dyson, M. and Ibbetson, D. (eds), Law and Legal Process: Substantive Law and Procedure in English Legal History, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, L. (2000), ‘How It All Began: The Monetary and Financial Architecture of Europe During the First Global Capital Markets, 1648–1815’, Financial History Review, 7(2): 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. and Weingast, B. (1989), ‘Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England’, Journal of Economic History, 49(4): 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, P. (2011), ‘The Nature and Historical Evolution of an Exceptional Fiscal State and Its Possible Significance for the Precocious Commercialization and Industrialization of the British Economy from Cromwell to Nelson’, Economic History Review, 64(2): 408–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S. and Carus, A. W. (2014), ‘Institutions and Economic Growth in Historical Perspective’, in Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N. (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 2), Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 403–513.Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T. (1948), A Concise History of the Common Law (4th edn), London, UK: Butterworth & Co.Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T. (1986) (1922), Statutes & Their Interpretation in the First Half of the Fourteenth Century, Holmes Beach, FL: Wm. W. Gaunt & Sons.Google Scholar
Popkin, W. D. (1999), Statutes in Court. The History and Theory of Statutory Interpretation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, J. (2013), ‘Jurisdictional Controversy and the Credibility of Common Law’, in Coffman, D., Leonard, A. and Neal, L. (eds), Questioning Credible Commitment: Perspectives on the Rise of Financial Capitalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, N. (2019), ‘The Financial Development of London in the 17th Century Revisited: A View from the Accounts of the Corporation of London’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP13920.Google Scholar
Sussman, N. and Yafeh, Y. (2006), ‘Institutional Reforms, Financial Development and Sovereign Debt: Britain 1690–1790’, Journal of Economic History, 66(4): 906–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, W. (2013), ‘Lawyers, Merchants, and the Law of Contract in the Long Eighteenth Century’, in Dyson, M. and Ibbetson, D. (eds), Law and Legal Process: Substantive Law and Procedure in English Legal History, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wennerlind, C. (2011), Casualties of Credit, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar