Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T06:22:49.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New records of injured Cambrian and Ordovician trilobites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2022

Russell D.C. Bicknell Open the ORCID record for Russell D.C. Bicknell [Opens in a new window] ,
Patrick M. Smith Open the ORCID record for Patrick M. Smith [Opens in a new window] ,
Thomas F. Howells  and
John R. Foster Open the ORCID record for John R. Foster [Opens in a new window]
Russell D.C. Bicknell*
Affiliation:
Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
Patrick M. Smith
Affiliation:
Palaeontology Department, Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia
Thomas F. Howells
Affiliation:
Utah Field House of Natural History State Park, Museum Collections, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA
John R. Foster
Affiliation:
Utah Field House of Natural History State Park, Museum Collections, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Records of abnormal fossil arthropods present important insight into how extinct forms responded to traumatic damage and developmental complications. Trilobites, bearing biomineralized dorsal exoskeletons, have arguably the most well-documented record of abnormalities spanning the Cambrian through the end-Permian. As such, new records of malformed, often injured, trilobites are occasionally identified. To further expand the documentation of abnormal specimens, we describe malformed specimens of Lyriaspis sigillum Whitehouse, 1939, Zacanthoides sp. indet., Asaphiscus wheeleri Meek, 1873, Elrathia kingii (Meek, 1870), and Ogygiocarella debuchii (Brongniart, 1822) from lower Paleozoic deposits. In considering these forms, we propose that they illustrate examples of injuries, and that the majority of these injuries reflect failed predation. We also considered the origin of injuries impacting singular segments, suggesting that these could reflect predation, self-induced damage, or intraspecific interactions during soft-shelled stages. Continued examination of lower Paleozoic trilobite injuries will further the understanding of how trilobites functioned as prey and elucidate how disparate trilobite groups recovered from failed attacks.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 96 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 921 - 929
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Introduction

Abnormal trilobites represent a primary means of understanding how a group of wholly extinct euarthropods responded to, and recovered from, injuries and developmental or genetic malfunctions (Owen, Reference Owen1985; Babcock, Reference Babcock1993, Reference Babcock, Mikulic, Landing and Kluessendorf2007; Bicknell and Pates, Reference Bicknell and Pates2020). The historical record of abnormal trilobites extends back to the middle nineteenth century (Portlock, Reference Portlock1845) with more detailed documentation arising during the later twentieth century (see Bergström and Levi-Setti, Reference Bergström and Levi-Setti1978; Šnajdr, Reference Šnajdr1978a, Reference Šnajdr1979, Reference Šnajdr1985; Rudkin, Reference Rudkin1979, Reference Rudkin1985; Conway Morris and Jenkins, Reference Conway Morris and Jenkins1985; Owen, Reference Owen1985; Babcock and Robison, Reference Babcock and Robison1989; Babcock, Reference Babcock1993). In the last decade alone, a marked surge in publications documenting these abnormal specimens has occurred. The majority of these works have considered abnormal specimens in the context of trilobite paleobiology and paleoecosystems (Budil et al., Reference Budil, Fatka, Zwanzig and Rak2010; Zamora et al., Reference Zamora, Mayoral, Esteve, Gámez-Vintaned and Santos2011; Fatka et al., Reference Fatka, Budil and Grigar2015, Reference Fatka, Budil and Zicha2021; Cheng et al., Reference Cheng, Han, Ou, Zhang, Guo and Zhang2019; Bicknell and Pates, Reference Bicknell and Pates2020; Bicknell and Smith, Reference Bicknell and Smith2021; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Smith, Bruthansová and Holland2021b; Foster, Reference Foster2021; Zong, Reference Zong2021a, Reference Zongb). Population-based data have been presented to explore injury patterns and lateralization in the trilobite fossil record (Pates et al., Reference Pates, Bicknell, Daley and Zamora2017; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Paterson and Hopkins2019; Pates and Bicknell, Reference Pates and Bicknell2019). Finally, limited publications have collated these observations to understand patterns of predation across the Paleozoic (Bicknell and Paterson, Reference Bicknell and Paterson2018; Vinn, Reference Vinn2018; Klompmaker et al., Reference Klompmaker, Kelley, Chattopadhyay, Clements, Huntley and Kowalewski2019). To further the examination of abnormal trilobites, and bolster evidence that is useful for large meta-analyses, we present seven new examples of abnormal specimens: one Lyriaspis sigillum Whitehouse, Reference Whitehouse1939 from the Wuliuan of Australia; one Zacanthoides sp. indet. (of Walcott, Reference Walcott1888) from the Wuliuan of the USA; two Asaphiscus wheeleri Meek, Reference Meek1873, and two Elrathia kingii (Meek, Reference Meek1870) from the Drumian of the USA; and one Ogygiocarella debuchii (Brongniart, Reference Brongniart1822) from the Darriwilian of Wales.

Geological context

The Lyriaspis sigillum specimen (AM F33980 and AM F34209) was collected from the Beetle Creek Formation, Georgina Basin at the type section (proximal to the Templeton River headwaters), Mt. Isa, western Queensland, Australia. There the unit consists of 15 m of siliceous shale, fine sandstone, thin calcareous beds, and chert horizons that were likely deposited below a storm wave base, at the oceanward shelf edge of a large epeiric sea (Fleming, Reference Fleming1977; Kruse, Reference Kruse2002). This portion of the formation is occasionally referred to as the ‘Lower Siltstone Member’ (Russell, Reference Russell1967), or the ‘undifferentiated Beetle Creek Formation’ (sensu Dunster et al., Reference Dunster, Kruse, Duffett and Ambrose2007). At the type locality, the unit unconformably overlies the Proterozoic rocks of the basin and is overlain by the Wuliuan-aged Inca Formation (Southgate and Shergold, Reference Southgate and Shergold1991; Dunster et al., Reference Dunster, Kruse, Duffett and Ambrose2007). Presence of the trilobite species Deiradonyx sp. aff. D. collabrevis Öpik, Reference Öpik1982 (likely D. collabrevis) suggests placement in the Pentagnostus praecurrens Biozone—the latter taxon co-occurs with the eponym in the ‘White Shale’ member of the Coonigan Formation, Gnalta Shelf, western New South Wales (originally described as P. veles Öpik, Reference Öpik1979, later synonymized by Laurie, Reference Laurie1988). Further support comes from close faunal ties to the Jigaimara Formation (Laurie, Reference Laurie2006b), Arafura Basin, Northern Territory and the lithological correlations to the lower Arthur Creek Formation, southeastern Georgina Basin (Laurie, Reference Laurie2004, Reference Laurie2006a; Dunster et al., Reference Dunster, Kruse, Duffett and Ambrose2007). The Australian Pentagnostus praecurrens Zone sits within early Templetonian Stage, equivalent to the Wuliuan Stage (Sundberg et al., Reference Sundberg, Geyer, Kruse, McCollum, Pegel, Zylinska and Zhuravlev2016, Peng et al., Reference Peng, Babcock, Ahlberg, Gradstein, Ogg, Schmitz and Ogg2020 and references therein).

The Zacanthoides sp. indet. specimen (FHPR 17618) was collected from the Half Moon Mine locality, Chisholm Formation, Lincoln County, eastern Nevada. The Chisholm Formation there consists of 17–35 m of tan to gray to light reddish calcareous shale with some thin (0.05–3 m) interbedded carbonates (Sundberg, Reference Sundberg2011). It is a relatively thin, slope-forming unit overlying the Lyndon Limestone and underlying the Highland Peak Formation. The examined specimen co-occured with trilobite genera, e.g., Amecephalus Walcott, Reference Walcott1924, Athabaskia Raymond, Reference Raymond1928, and Glossopleura Poulsen, Reference Poulsen1927; echinoderms (Gogia Walcott, Reference Walcott1917); and the edrioasteroid Totiglobus Bell and Sprinkle, Reference Bell and Sprinkle1978 (Sundberg, Reference Sundberg2011; Foster and Gaines, Reference Foster and Gaines2016). This fauna indicates that, at the Half Moon Mine, the Chisholm Formation is from the Glossopleura walcotti and Pentagnostus praecurrens biozones of the Wuliuan Stage (Sundberg, Reference Sundberg2011; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Babcock, Ahlberg, Gradstein, Ogg, Schmitz and Ogg2020).

The Asaphiscus wheeleri and Elrathia kingii specimens were collected from the Wheeler Formation, Millard County, western Utah, USA. The A. wheeleri (FHPR 16702, MWC 9973) and one E. kingii (MWC 9972) are from the House Range (Wheeler Amphitheater site), whereas another E. kingii (FHPR 16640) is from the Wheeler Formation in the Drum Mountains. The Wheeler Formation is up to 277 m of gray to olive to pinkish calcareous shale (Hintze and Davis, Reference Hintze and Davis2002, Reference Hintze and Davis2003). The formation overlies the Swasey Limestone and underlies the Marjum Formation in the House Range and the Pierson Cove Formation (a carbonate-rich, Marjum Formation equivalent) in the Drum Mountains. Restriction of the Wheeler Formation to the House Range and Drum Mountains reflects infilling of the middle Cambrian House Range Embayment—a fault-bounded, deep-water bathymetric feature of the Laurentian shelf that was surrounded on three sides by shallow carbonate belt deposits (Rees, Reference Rees1986; Foster and Gaines, Reference Foster and Gaines2016). The deeper-water setting of the Wheeler Formation within the embayment allowed preservation of articulated trilobites and soft-bodied taxa (Robison et al., Reference Robison, Babcock and Gunther2015). The examined specimens from the House Range are from the upper Wheeler Formation, and the Drum Mountains specimen is also from the upper portion of the same formation, ~7 m below the Pierson Cove Formation. This places the material in the Bolaspidella and Ptychagnostus atavus biozones of the Drumian Stage (Babcock et al., Reference Babcock, Robison, Rees, Peng and Saltzman2007; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Babcock, Ahlberg, Gradstein, Ogg, Schmitz and Ogg2020).

The Ogygiocarella debuchii specimen (AM F128230) originated from a Llanfawr quarry near the township of Llandrindod Wells, central Wales, UK. These quarries are known for complete O. debuchii specimens, as well as other well-preserved trilobites (Hughes, Reference Hughes1969, Reference Hughes1971, Reference Hughes1979; Owens, Reference Owens1981, Reference Owens2002; Sheldon, Reference Sheldon1987a). The specimen was from the lower Llanfawr Mudstones (Sheldon, Reference Sheldon1987b; Owens, Reference Owens2002) of the Builth Inlier. The Llanfawr Mudstones layer is relatively thick (> 200 m at some localities) and dominated by fine mudstone and siltstone that were deposited in relatively quiet, middle to outer shelf depths (Fortey and Owens, Reference Fortey and Owens1987; Owens, Reference Owens2002). Ogygiocarella debuchii ranges through the entire formation, between the upper Didymograptus murchisonii and lower Nemagraptus gracilis biozones. However, the specimens reported here are likely from the regional Llandeilian Stage (Hustedograptus? teretiusculus Biozone) (Sheldon, Reference Sheldon1987b), correlating with the upper Middle Ordovician, Darriwilian (Bettley et al., Reference Bettley, Fortey and Siveter2001; Cooper and Sadler, Reference Cooper, Sadler, Gradstein, Ogg, Schmitz and Ogg2012; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Smith, Bruthansová and Holland2021b).

Materials and methods

Trilobite specimens within the AM, FHPR, and MWC were reviewed for abnormalities by RDCB and JRF. A total of seven specimens were identified. Specimens were coated in magnesium oxide and photographed under low angle LED light with a Canon EOS 5DS (AM specimens) or a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV (FHPR and MWC specimens). All measurements of specimens were made using ImageJ (Schneider et al., Reference Schneider, Rasband and Eliceiri2012).

Repositories and institutional abbreviations

AM = Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; FHPR = Utah Field House of Natural History State Park Museum, Vernal, Utah, USA; MWC = Museums of Western Colorado, Dinosaur Journey Museum, Fruita, Colorado, USA.

Results

The Lyriaspis sigillum specimen is articulated internal (AM F34209) and external (AM F33980) molds, and AM F33980 is more complete (Fig. 1). The specimen has a U-shaped indentation on the left thoracic pleural lobe (Fig. 1.1, 1.2). The indentation impacts thoracic segments 3–6, truncates pleurae by 1 mm, and is 2.6 mm long. The abnormality margin is cicatrized and thoracic segments 4 and 5 are pinched distally (Fig. 1.1, 1.4).

Figure 1. Malformed Lyriaspis sigillum Whitehouse, Reference Whitehouse1939, Beetle Creek Formation (Miaolingian, Wuliuan): (1, 2) AM F34209: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing U-shaped injury; (3, 4) AM F33980: (3) complete specimen; (4) detail of abnormality in box in (3) showing injury. All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.

The Zacanthoides sp. indet. specimen is a partial internal mold showing the anterior right cephalic and thoracic regions (FHPR 17618; Fig. 2.3, 2.4). The first thoracic pleural spine of the specimen has been truncated by 1.3 mm (Fig. 2.3, 2.4). The spine also has a U-shaped indentation with a reduced, posteriorly directed spine (Fig. 2.4). This reduced section likely records abnormal regrowth of the segment through subsequent molting events.

Figure 2. Malformed Ogygiocarella debuchii (Brongniart, Reference Brongniart1822) and Zacanthoides sp. indet. (of Walcott, Reference Walcott1888): (1, 2) Ogygiocarella debuchii from the Llanfawr Mudstones (Middle Ordovician, Darriwilian), AM F128230: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing W-shaped indentation on the left side of the pygidium; (3, 4) Zacanthoides sp. indet. from the Half Moon Mine, Chisholm Formation (Miaolingian, Wuliuan), FHPR 17618: (3) complete specimen; (4) detail of abnormality in box in (3) showing abnormally developed pleural spine (white arrow). All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.

Two abnormal Asaphiscus wheeleri specimens were considered. The first specimen is a complete internal mold (MWC 9973; Fig. 3.1–3.3). MWC 9973 has two abnormalities on the left thoracic pleural lobe. The anterior abnormality truncates the thoracic pleurae 1–4 by ~1.5 mm when compared to the right pleural lobe and shows an L-shaped morphology (sensu Bicknell and Pates, Reference Bicknell and Pates2020). This region shows evidence of possible regrowth of the anteriormost pleurae. Further, the fourth thoracic pleura has a pinched region (Fig. 3.2). The posterior abnormality is a U-shaped indentation that impacts thoracic pleurae 7–9 and the anteriormost pygidium. The edge of this indentation shows marked cicatrization (Fig. 3.3) and truncates pleurae by 2.5 mm. The second specimen is an internal mold with a damaged cephalon (FHPR 16702; Fig. 3.4, 3.5). The specimen has a single segment injury (SSI) on the eighth pleura on the right pleural lobe. This truncates the pleural spine by 1.7 mm.

Figure 3. Malformed Asaphiscus wheeleri Meek, Reference Meek1873, House Range, Wheeler Formation (Miaolingian, Drumian): (1–3) MWC 9973: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing L-shaped injury and pinched pleural region (black arrow); (3) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing U-shaped injury; (4, 5) FHPR 16702: (4) complete specimen; (5) detail of abnormality in box in (4) showing SSI (white arrow). All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.

Two abnormal Elrathia kingii specimens were identified. The first specimen is a complete internal mold (MWC 9972; Fig. 4.1, 4.2). MWC 9972 has a large W-shaped indentation on the left thoracic pleural lobe impacting thoracic pleurae 1–7. The indentation extends up to 4.3 mm into the specimen and shows evidence of cicatrization (Fig. 4.2). The second specimen is an internal mold and likely represents a molt (Daley and Drage, Reference Daley and Drage2016; Drage et al., Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018; Drage, Reference Drage2019) (FHPR 16640; Fig. 4.3, 4.4). The specimen has a V-shaped indentation with limited cicatrization that impacts thoracic pleurae 7 and 8 on the right pleural lobe (Fig. 4.4). This indentation truncates pleurae by 4.6 mm.

Figure 4. Malformed Elrathia kingii (Meek, Reference Meek1870), Wheeler Formation (Miaolingian, Drumian): (1, 2) MWC 9972, House Range outcrop: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing large W-shaped indentation; (3, 4) FHPR 16640, Drum Mountains outcrop: (3) complete specimen; (4) detail of abnormality in box in (3) showing V-shaped indentation (dotted white line, white arrow). All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.

The Ogygiocarella debuchii specimen is an articulated internal mold (AM F128230; Fig. 2.1, 2.2). The specimen has a large W-shaped indentation on the left side of the pygidium that extends across ~75% of the pygidium (Fig. 2.1, 2.2). The malformation is 17.1 mm long and the margin shows extensive fusion of the damaged pygidium. This results in an inflated pygidial border relative to other exoskeletal regions (Fig. 2.2).

Discussion

The abnormal trilobites documented here show evidence of removal of exoskeletal sections. Furthermore, no specimens have abnormal growths indicative of genetic malformations (Owen, Reference Owen1980, Reference Owen1985; Babcock, Reference Babcock1993; Bicknell and Smith, Reference Bicknell and Smith2021) or circular/ovate structures indicative of pathologies (Šnajdr, Reference Šnajdr1978b; Babcock, Reference Babcock1993; De Beats et al., Reference De Baets, Budil, Fatka, Geyer, De Baets and Huntley2021). These specimens therefore show examples of injuries (Owen, Reference Owen1985; Babcock, Reference Babcock1993; Pates et al., Reference Pates, Bicknell, Daley and Zamora2017; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Smith, Bruthansová and Holland2021b) that occurred through failed predation, a molting complication, or some other traumatic injury. Trilobites with overdeveloped thoracic spines, e.g., Nevadia weeksi (Walcott, Reference Walcott1910), likely experienced molting complications and would have damaged the hypertrophied spines (Conway Morris and Jenkins, Reference Conway Morris and Jenkins1985; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Holmes, Pates, García-Bellido and Paterson2022). The examined specimens lack these morphologies. Furthermore, L-, U-, V-, and W-shaped indentations are commonly attributed to failed predation (Šnajdr, Reference Šnajdr1981, Reference Šnajdr1985; Owen, Reference Owen1985; Babcock, Reference Babcock1993, Reference Babcock, Mikulic, Landing and Kluessendorf2007; Fatka et al., Reference Fatka, Szabad and Budil2009, Reference Fatka, Budil and Grigar2015; Pates et al., Reference Pates, Bicknell, Daley and Zamora2017; Bicknell and Holland, Reference Bicknell and Holland2020). As such, the indentations likely record failed predation.

Explanations for SSIs are therefore worth considering. When SSIs are observed with larger injuries on the opposing side (Conway Morris and Jenkins, Reference Conway Morris and Jenkins1985; Nedin, Reference Nedin1999; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Holmes, Pates, García-Bellido and Paterson2022), they likely reflect a bilateral predatory attack. When SSIs are not identified with larger injuries, further explanation is needed. It seems unlikely that predators large enough to consume trilobites would damage only one segment (Babcock, Reference Babcock1993). However, smaller predators could have removed a single section while a trilobite was in a soft-shelled stage. Failed predation as an explanation for unpaired SSIs is therefore plausible. An SSI could occur during enrollment—if an individual enrolled too quickly or on an abnormal angle, a segment could be nicked. Furthermore, intraspecific competition during feeding or seeking communal shelter during the postecdysal, soft-shell phase could have resulted in minor damage. As such, consideration of broader paleoecology is needed when proposing explanations for SSIs.

The injured Lyriaspis sigillum documented here represents the first record of a malformed trilobite from the Beetle Creek Formation and the second example of predation from the deposit (see Jones and McKenzie, Reference Jones and McKenzie1980). The degree of exoskeletal warping around the injury in AM F34209/F33980 indicates that the specimen was damaged during a soft-shelled phase and also suggests that durophages were present in the Beetle Creek Formation biota. One of the co-occurring Xystridura spp. (four are currently known from the unit) is a possible injury-maker, given the size of the genus (Öpik, Reference Öpik1975). Appendage data is unknown for Xystridura Öpik, Reference Öpik1975; however, it was likely comparable to other predatory artiopodans and used gnathobasic spines on walking legs to masticate prey (Zacaï et al., Reference Zacaï, Vannier and Lerosey-Aubril2016; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Ledogar, Wroe, Gutzler, Watson and Paterson2018, Reference Bicknell, Holmes, Edgecombe, Losso, Ortega-Hernández, Wroe and Paterson2021a). Alternatively, large, nonbiomineralized artiopodans with gnathobasic spines might have produced the injury and the lack of soft-bodied preservation in the Beetle Creek Formation precludes the identification of these forms. Regardless, the rarity of injured L. sigillum reflects either an occasional diet of smaller trilobites, or the complete consumption of prey. Shelly coprolites from equivalent Xystridura-bearing units (e.g., the Giles Creek Dolostone in the neighboring Amadeus Basin, Northern Territory) would support the second theory (unpublished data, Smith, 2022).

Prior to documentation of the injured Asaphiscus wheeleri specimen considered here, only malformed Asaphiscus wheeleri pygidia were known (Vorwald, Reference Vorwald1984; Babcock, Reference Babcock1993; Bicknell and Paterson, Reference Bicknell and Paterson2018). The addition of thoracic injuries illustrates that Asaphiscus wheeleri was subject to more substantial predation than previously thought. Previous records of predation within the Wheeler Formation have been assigned to the activities of priapulid worms (Conway Morris and Robison, Reference Conway Morris and Robison1986), radiodonts (Babcock, Reference Babcock1993), and artiopodans with gnathobasic spines on walking legs (Bicknell and Pates, Reference Bicknell and Pates2020). However, biomechanical and functional morphological evidence suggest that the last group were the most effective at breaking exoskeletons (Bruton, Reference Bruton1981; Stein, Reference Stein2013; Zacaï et al., Reference Zacaï, Vannier and Lerosey-Aubril2016; Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Ledogar, Wroe, Gutzler, Watson and Paterson2018, Reference Bicknell, Holmes, Edgecombe, Losso, Ortega-Hernández, Wroe and Paterson2021a; Holmes et al., Reference Holmes, Paterson and García-Bellido2020). Further examination of the morphology and predatory ability of other possible predators from these sites is needed to present more complete paleoecological reconstructions and aid in understanding the role of predation during the earliest marine ecosystems.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by an Australian Research Council grant (DP200102005), a University of New England Postdoctoral Fellowship (to RDCB), a Karl Hirsch Memorial Grant (to RDCB), and an Australian Museum AMF/AMRI Visiting Research Fellowship (to RDCB). Field work facilitated in part by US Bureau of Land Management permits UT16-014S and N-86224 (to JRF), with thanks to field crew members A.R.C. Milner, R. Hunt-Foster, J. Lehane, M. Perry, and T. Lawrence. MWC specimens were collected by D. Dayvault, and we thank J. McHugh for loan of this material. We thank S. Pates for discussions regarding causes of trilobite injuries. Finally, we thank R.-W. Zong and D. Rudkin for their thorough reviews that substantially improved the text.

References

Babcock, L.E., 1993, Trilobite malformations and the fossil record of behavioral asymmetry: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L.E., 2007, Role of malformations in elucidating trilobite paleobiology: A historical synthesis, in Mikulic, D.G., Landing, E., and Kluessendorf, J., eds., Fabulous Fossils—300 Years of Worldwide Research on Trilobites: Albany, New York, University of the State of New York, State Education Dept., New York State Museum, p. 3–19.Google Scholar
Babcock, L.E., and Robison, R.A., 1989, Preferences of Palaeozoic predators: Nature, v. 337, p. 695–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L.E., Robison, R.A., Rees, M.N., Peng, S., and Saltzman, M.R., 2007, The Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Drumian Stage (Cambrian) in the Drum Mountains, Utah, USA: Episodes, v. 30, p. 84–92, https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2007/v30i2/003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B.M., and Sprinkle, J., 1978, Totiglobus, an unusual new edrioasteroid from the middle Cambrian of Nevada: Journal of Paleontology, v. 52, p. 243–266.Google Scholar
Bergström, J., and Levi-Setti, R., 1978, Phenotypic variation in the middle Cambrian trilobite Paradoxides davidis Salter at Manuels, SE Newfoundland: Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. 12, p. 1–40.Google Scholar
Bettley, R.M., Fortey, R.A., and Siveter, D.J., 2001, High-resolution correlation of Anglo-Welsh Middle to Upper Ordovician sequences and its relevance to international chronostratigraphy: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 158, p. 937–952, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764900-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicknell, R.D.C., and Holland, B., 2020, Injured trilobites within a collection of dinosaurs: Using the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology to document Cambrian predation: Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 23, p. a33, https://doi.org/10.26879/1087.Google Scholar
Bicknell, R.D.C., and Paterson, J.R., 2018, Reappraising the early evidence of durophagy and drilling predation in the fossil record: Implications for escalation and the Cambrian Explosion: Biological Reviews, v. 93, p. 754–784, https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12365.Google ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, R.D.C., and Pates, S., 2020, Exploring abnormal Cambrian-aged trilobites in the Smithsonian collection: PeerJ, v. 8, p. e8453, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, R.D.C., and Smith, P.M., 2021, Teratological trilobites from the Silurian (Wenlock and Ludlow) of Australia: The Science of Nature, v. 108, p. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01766-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, R.D.C., Ledogar, J.A., Wroe, S., Gutzler, B.C., Watson, W.H. III, and Paterson, J.R., 2018, Computational biomechanical analyses demonstrate similar shell-crushing abilities in modern and ancient arthropods: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, v. 285, p. 20181935, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1935.Google ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, R.D.C., Paterson, J.R., and Hopkins, M.J., 2019, A trilobite cluster from the Silurian Rochester Shale of New York: Predation patterns and possible defensive behavior: American Museum Novitates, v. 39, p. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1206/3937.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicknell, R.D.C., Holmes, J.D., Edgecombe, G.D., Losso, S.R., Ortega-Hernández, J., Wroe, S., and Paterson, J.R., 2021a, Biomechanical analyses of Cambrian euarthropod limbs reveal their effectiveness in mastication and durophagy: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, v. 288, p. 20202075, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2075.Google ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, R.D.C., Smith, P.M., Bruthansová, J., and Holland, B., 2021b, Malformed trilobites from the Ordovician and Devonian: PalZ, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-021-00572-9.Google Scholar
Bicknell, R.D.C., Holmes, J.D., Pates, S., García-Bellido, D.C., and Paterson, J.R., 2022, Cambrian carnage: Trilobite predator-prey interactions in the Emu Bay Shale of South Australia: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 591, p. 110877, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.110877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brongniart, A., 1822, Sur la classification et la distribution des végétaux fossiles: Mémoires du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle (Paris), v. 8, p. 203–348.Google Scholar
Bruton, D.L., 1981, The arthropod Sidneyia inexpectans, middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, v. 295, p. 619–656.Google Scholar
Budil, P., Fatka, O., Zwanzig, M., and Rak, Š., 2010, Two unique Middle Ordovician trilobites from the Prague Basin, Czech Republic: Journal of the National Museum (Prague), Natural History Series, v. 179, p. 95–104.Google Scholar
Cheng, M.R., Han, J., Ou, G., Zhang, Z.F., Guo, J., and Zhang, X.L., 2019, Injured trilobite Eoredichia intermedia from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 58, p. 425–435, https://doi.org/10.19800/j.cnki.aps.2019.04.001.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Jenkins, R.J.F., 1985, Healed injuries in early Cambrian trilobites from South Australia: Alcheringa, v. 9, p. 167–177.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Robison, R., 1986, Middle Cambrian priapulids and other soft-bodied fossils from Utah and Spain: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, v. 117, p. 1–22.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.A., and Sadler, P.M., 2012, The Ordovician Period, in Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M., and Ogg, G., eds., The Geologic Time Scale 2012: Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 489–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, A.C., and Drage, H.B., 2016, The fossil record of ecdysis, and trends in the moulting behaviour of trilobites: Arthropod Structure & Development, v. 45, p. 71–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2015.09.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Baets, K., Budil, P., Fatka, O., and Geyer, G., 2021, Trilobites as hosts for parasites: From paleopathologies to etiologies, in De Baets, K., and Huntley, J.W., eds., The Evolution and Fossil Record of Parasitism: Coevolution and Paleoparasitological Techniques: Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, p. 173–201, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52233-9_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drage, H.B., 2019, Quantifying intra- and interspecific variability in trilobite moulting behaviour across the Palaeozoic: Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 22, p. 1–39, https://doi.org/10.26879/940.Google Scholar
Drage, H.B., Holmes, J.D., García-Bellido, D.C., and Daley, A.C., 2018, An exceptional record of Cambrian trilobite moulting behaviour preserved in the Emu Bay Shale, South Australia: Lethaia, v. 51, p. 473–492, https://doi.org/10.1111/let.12266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunster, J.N., Kruse, P.D., Duffett, M.L., and Ambrose, G.J., 2007, Geology and resource potential of the southern Georgina Basin: Northern Territory Geological Survey, Digital Information Package DIP007, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Fatka, O., Szabad, M., and Budil, P., 2009, Malformed agnostids from the middle Cambrian Jince Formation of the Pøíbram-Jince Basin, Czech Republic: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 84, p. 121–126, https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatka, O., Budil, P., and Grigar, L., 2015, A unique case of healed injury in a Cambrian trilobite: Annales de Paléontologie, v. 101, p. 295–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annpal.2015.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatka, O., Budil, P., and Zicha, O., 2021, Exoskeletal and eye repair in Dalmanitina socialis (Trilobita): An example of blastemal regeneration in the Ordovician?: International Journal of Paleopathology, v. 34, p. 113–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpp.2021.05.011.Google ScholarPubMed
Fleming, P.J.G., 1977, Faunas, lithologies, and the origin of phosphorites in parts of the middle Cambrian Beetle Creek Formation of northwest Queensland: Geological Survey of Queensland Publication, v. 364, p. 21.Google Scholar
Fortey, R.A., and Owens, R.M., 1987, The Arenig Series in South Wales: Bulletin of the British Museum, Natural History (Geology), v. 41, p. 69–307.Google Scholar
Foster, J.R., 2021, Abnormal pygidial spine in an injured (?) trilobite (Tricrepicephalus texanus) from the Weeks Formation (Cambrian, Guzhangian), House Range, Utah: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 82, p. 71–74.Google Scholar
Foster, J.R., and Gaines, R.R., 2016, Taphonomy and paleoecology of the ‘middle’ Cambrian (Series 3) formations in Utah's West Desert: Recent finds and new data: Utah Geological Association Publication, v. 45, p. 291–336.Google Scholar
Hintze, L.F., and Davis, F.D., 2002, Geologic map of the Tule Valley 30’ x 60’ quadrangle and parts of the Ely, Fish Springs, and Kern Mountains 30’ x 60’ quadrangles, northwest Millard County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey, Map 186, scale 1:100,000, 1 sheet, 1 p. text.Google Scholar
Hintze, L.F., and Davis, F.D., 2003, Geology of Millard County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey, Bulletin, v. 133, p. 1–305.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.D., Paterson, J.R., and García-Bellido, D.C., 2020, The trilobite Redlichia from the lower Cambrian Emu Bay Shale Konservat-Lagerstätte of South Australia: Systematics, ontogeny and soft-part anatomy: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 18, p. 295–334, https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2019.1605411.Google Scholar
Hughes, C.P., 1969, Ordovician trilobite faunas from central Wales, part I: Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology), v. 18, p. 39–103.Google Scholar
Hughes, C.P., 1971, Ordovician trilobite faunas from central Wales, part II: Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology), v. 20, p. 115–182.Google Scholar
Hughes, C.P., 1979, Ordovician trilobite faunas from central Wales, part III: Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology), v. 32, p. 109–181.Google Scholar
Jones, P.J., and McKenzie, K.G., 1980, Queensland middle Cambrian Bradoriida (Crustacea): New taxa, palaeobiogeography and biological affinities: Alcheringa, v. 4, p. 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klompmaker, A.A., Kelley, P.H., Chattopadhyay, D., Clements, J.C., Huntley, J.W., and Kowalewski, M., 2019, Predation in the marine fossil record: Studies, data, recognition, environmental factors, and behavior: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 194, p. 472–520, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, P.D., 2002, Biostratigraphic potential of middle Cambrian hyoliths from the eastern Georgina Basin: Alcheringa, v. 26, p. 353–398, https://doi.org/10.1080/03115510208619263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, J.R., 1988, Revision of some Australian Ptychagnostinae (Agnostida, Cambrian): Alcheringa, v. 12, p. 169–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, J.R., 2004, Early middle Cambrian trilobite faunas from NTGS Elkedra 3 corehole, southern Georgina Basin, Northern Territory: Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, v. 30, p. 221–260.Google Scholar
Laurie, J.R., 2006a, Early middle Cambrian trilobites from Pacific Oil & Gas Baldwin 1 well, southern Georgina Basin, Northern Territory: Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, v. 32, p. 127–204.Google Scholar
Laurie, J.R., 2006b, Early middle Cambrian trilobites from the Jigaimara Formation, Arafura Basin, Northern Territory: Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, v. 32, p. 103–126.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., 1870, Descriptions of fossils collected by the US Geological Survey under the charge of Clerence King, Esq.: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 14, p. 56–64.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., 1873, Preliminary paleontological report, consisting of lists and descriptions of fossils, with remarks on the ages of the rocks in which they were found, in U.S. Geological Survey of the Territories, 6th Annual Report: Washington, DC, United States Geological Survey, p. 429–518.Google Scholar
Nedin, C., 1999, Anomalocaris predation on nonmineralized and mineralized trilobites: Geology, v. 27, p. 987–990.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, A.A., 1975, Templetonian and Ordian xystridurid trilobites of Australia: Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology & Geophysics, v. 121, p. 1–84.Google Scholar
Öpik, A.A., 1979, Middle Cambrian agnostids: Systematics and biostratigraphy: Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology & Geophysics, v. 172, p. 1–188.Google Scholar
Öpik, A.A., 1982, Dolichometopid trilobites of Queensland, Northern Territory, and New South Wales: Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology & Geophysics, v. 175, p. 1–85.Google Scholar
Owen, A.W., 1980, An abnormal cranidium of the trilobite Calyptaulax norvegicus: Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, v. 60, p. 87–88.Google Scholar
Owen, A.W., 1985, Trilobite abnormalities: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences, v. 76, p. 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, R.M., 1981, The Ordovician proetacean trilobite Rorringtonia: Geological Magazine, v. 118, p. 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, R.M., 2002, Cyclopygid trilobites from the Ordovician Builth-Llandrindod Inlier, central Wales: Palaeontology, v. 45, p. 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pates, S., and Bicknell, R.D.C., 2019, Elongated thoracic spines as potential predatory deterrents in olenelline trilobites from the lower Cambrian of Nevada: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 516, p. 295–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pates, S., Bicknell, R.D.C., Daley, A.C., and Zamora, S., 2017, Quantitative analysis of repaired and unrepaired damage to trilobites from the Cambrian (Stage 4, Drumian) Iberian Chains, NE Spain: Palaios, v. 32, p. 750–761, https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2017.055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S., Babcock, L.E., and Ahlberg, P., 2020, The Cambrian Period, in Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D., and Ogg, G.M., eds., Geologic Time Scale 2020, Volume 2: Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 565–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portlock, J.E., 1845, Report on the Geology of the county of Londonderry and of parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh: Dublin, A. Milliken, 784 p., 38 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, C., 1927, The Cambrian, Ozarkian and Canadian faunas of northwest Greenland: Meddelelser om Grønland, v. 70, p. 233–243.Google Scholar
Raymond, P.E., 1928, Two new Cambrian trilobites: American Journal of Science, v. 5, p. 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, M.N., 1986, A fault-controlled trough through a carbonate platform: The Middle Cambrian House Range embayment: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 97, p. 1054–1069.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R.A., Babcock, L.E., and Gunther, V.G., 2015, Exceptional Cambrian fossils from Utah: A window into the age of trilobites: Utah Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Publication 15-1, 99 p.Google Scholar
Rudkin, D.M., 1979, Healed injuries in Ogygopsis klotzi (Trilobita) from the middle Cambrian of British Columbia: Royal Ontario Museum, Life Sciences Occasional Paper, v. 32, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
Rudkin, D.M., 1985, Exoskeletal abnormalities in four trilobites: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 22, p. 479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R.T., 1967, Discovery of major phosphate deposits in northwest Queensland: Queensland Government Mining Journal, v. 68, p. 153–157.Google Scholar
Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., and Eliceiri, K.W., 2012, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis: Nature Methods, v. 9, p. 671–675, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheldon, P.R., 1987a, Parallel gradualistic evolution of Ordovician trilobites: Nature, v. 330, p. 561–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, P.R., 1987b, Trilobite evolution and faunal distribution in some Ordovician rocks of the Builth Inlier, central Wales [Ph.D. thesis]: Cambridge, UK, University of Cambridge, 256 p.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M., 1978a, Anomalous carapaces of Bohemian paradoxid trilobites: Sborník Geologických Věd Paleontologie, v. 20, p. 7–31.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M., 1978b, Pathological neoplasms in the fringe of Bohemoharpes (Trilobita): Věstník Ústředního Ústavu Geologického, v. 53, p. 49–50.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M., 1979, Two trinucleid trilobites with repair of traumatic injury: Věstiník Ústředního Ústavu Geologického, v. 54, p. 49–50.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M., 1981, Bohemian Proetidae with malformed exoskeletons (Trilobita): Sborník Geologických Věd Paleontologie, v. 24, p. 37–61.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M., 1985, Anomalous exoskeletons of Bohemian encrinurine trilobites: Věstník Ústředního Ústavu Geologického, v. 60, p. 303–306.Google Scholar
Southgate, P.N., and Shergold, J.H., 1991, Application of sequence stratigraphic concepts to middle Cambrian phosphogenesis, Georgina Basin, Australia: BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, v. 12, p. 119–144.Google Scholar
Stein, M., 2013, Cephalic and appendage morphology of the Cambrian arthropod Sidneyia inexpectans: Zoologischer Anzeiger, v. 253, p. 164–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2013.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, F.A., 2011, Chisholm Shale (Glossopleura walcotti Zone, upper Delamaran, Global Stage 5) at the Half Moon Mine, Pioche, Nevada, in Hollingsworth, J.S., Sundberg, F.A., and Foster, J.R., eds., Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada: Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, v. 67, p. 224–226.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F.A., Geyer, G., Kruse, P.D., McCollum, L.B., Pegel, T.V., Zylinska, A., and Zhuravlev, A.Y., 2016, International correlation of the Cambrian Series 2-3, Stages 4-5 boundary interval: Australasian Palaeontological Memoirs, v. 49, p. 83–124.Google Scholar
Vinn, O., 2018, Traces of predation in the Cambrian: Historical Biology, v. 30, p. 1043–1049, https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1329305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorwald, G.R., 1984, Paleontology and paleoecology of the upper Wheeler Formation (late middle Cambrian), Drum Mountains, west-central Utah [M.S. thesis]: Lawrence, University of Kansas, 176 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C.D., 1888, Cambrian fossils from Mount Stephen, northwest territory of Canada: American Journal of Science, ser. 3, v. 36, p. 163–166.Google Scholar
Walcott, C.D., 1910, Cambrian geology and paleontology, no. 6: Olenellus and other genera of the Mesonacidae: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 53, p. 231–422.Google Scholar
Walcott, C.D., 1917, Cambrian geology and paleontology, 4, Fauna of the Mount Whyte Formation: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 67, p. 61–114.Google Scholar
Walcott, C.D., 1924, Cambrian and Ozarkian trilobites: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 75, p. 53–60.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F.W., 1939, The Cambrian faunas of north-eastern Australia, part 3: The polymerid trilobites: Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, v. 21, p. 179–282.Google Scholar
Zacaï, A., Vannier, J., and Lerosey-Aubril, R., 2016, Reconstructing the diet of a 505-million-year-old arthropod: Sidneyia inexpectans from the Burgess Shale fauna : Arthropod Structure & Development, v. 45, p. 200–220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2015.09.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamora, S., Mayoral, E., Esteve, J., Gámez-Vintaned, J.A., and Santos, A., 2011, Exoskeletal abnormalities in paradoxidid trilobites from the Cambrian of Spain, and a new type of bite trace: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 86, p. 665–673, https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, R.-W., 2021a, Abnormalities in early Paleozoic trilobites from central and eastern China: Palaeoworld, v. 30, p. 430–439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2020.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, R.-W., 2021b, Injuries and molting interference in a trilobite from the Cambrian (Furongian) of South China: PeerJ, v. 9, p. e11201, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Malformed Lyriaspis sigillum Whitehouse, 1939, Beetle Creek Formation (Miaolingian, Wuliuan): (1, 2) AM F34209: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing U-shaped injury; (3, 4) AM F33980: (3) complete specimen; (4) detail of abnormality in box in (3) showing injury. All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Malformed Ogygiocarella debuchii (Brongniart, 1822) and Zacanthoides sp. indet. (of Walcott, 1888): (1, 2) Ogygiocarella debuchii from the Llanfawr Mudstones (Middle Ordovician, Darriwilian), AM F128230: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing W-shaped indentation on the left side of the pygidium; (3, 4) Zacanthoides sp. indet. from the Half Moon Mine, Chisholm Formation (Miaolingian, Wuliuan), FHPR 17618: (3) complete specimen; (4) detail of abnormality in box in (3) showing abnormally developed pleural spine (white arrow). All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Malformed Asaphiscus wheeleri Meek, 1873, House Range, Wheeler Formation (Miaolingian, Drumian): (1–3) MWC 9973: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing L-shaped injury and pinched pleural region (black arrow); (3) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing U-shaped injury; (4, 5) FHPR 16702: (4) complete specimen; (5) detail of abnormality in box in (4) showing SSI (white arrow). All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Malformed Elrathia kingii (Meek, 1870), Wheeler Formation (Miaolingian, Drumian): (1, 2) MWC 9972, House Range outcrop: (1) complete specimen; (2) detail of abnormality in box in (1) showing large W-shaped indentation; (3, 4) FHPR 16640, Drum Mountains outcrop: (3) complete specimen; (4) detail of abnormality in box in (3) showing V-shaped indentation (dotted white line, white arrow). All specimens coated. All images converted to grayscale.