Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Conservation short cut, or long and winding road? A critique of umbrella species criteria

  • Philip J. Seddon (a1) and Tara Leech (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Conservation planners often seek short cuts when making decisions about land use by directing management towards one or a few species that will benefit the wider ecosystem. The umbrella species concept is one such proposed short cut. An umbrella species comprises a population of individuals of a particular species whose resource requirements and habitat needs encompass the sufficient home ranges and resource needs of viable populations of co-occurring species. We examined the 17 published criteria available to identify a potential umbrella species and recommend that conservation managers wishing to apply this concept could focus on only seven criteria: well-known biology; large home range size; high probability of population persistence; co-occurrence of species of conservation interest; management needs that are beneficial to co-occurring species; sensitivity to human disturbance; and ease of monitoring. We note however, that rigorous assessment of candidate umbrella species requires such detailed knowledge of candidate and co-occurring species that it seems less of a short cut than planners may wish.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. E-mail philip.seddon@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S.J. Andelman & W.F Fagan . (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 59545959.

J Berger . (1997) Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conservation Biology, 11, 6978.

C.J. Betrus , E. Fleishman & R.B Blair . (2005) Cross-taxonomic potential and spatial transferability of an umbrella species index. Journal of Environmental Management, 74, 7987.

T.M Caro . (2001) Species richness and abundance of small mammals inside and outside an African national park. Biological Conservation, 98, 251257.

T.M Caro . (2003) Umbrella species: critique and lessons from East Africa. Animal Conservation, 6, 171181.

T. Caro , A. Englis Jr, E. Fitzherbert & T Gardner . (2004) Preliminary assessment of the flagship species concept at a small scale. Animal Conservation, 7, 6370.

T.M. Caro & G O'Doherty . (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 13, 805814.

P Chouteau . (2004) The impacts of logging on the microhabitats used by two species of couas in the western forest of Madagascar. Comptes rendus Biologies, 327, 11571170.

E. Fleishman , D.D. Murphy & P.F Brussard . (2000) A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications, 10, 569579.

N.P. Hitt & C.A Frissell . (2004) A case study of surrogate species in aquatic conservation planning. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 14, 625633.

R.J Lambeck . (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 11, 849856.

D.B. Lindenmayer & J Fischer . (2003) Sound science, or social hook – a response to Brooker's application of the focal species approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 149158.

T.L. Mildenstein , S.C. Stier , C.E. Nuevo-Diego & L.S Mills . (2005) Habitat selection of endangered and endemic large flying-foxes in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biological Conservation, 126, 93102.

B.R. Noon & V.H Dale . (2002) Broad-scale ecological science and its application. In Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation (ed. K.J. Gutzwiller ), pp. 3452. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.

K. Ozaki , M. Isono , T. Kawahara , S. Iida , T. Kudo & K Fukuyama . (2006) A mechanistic approach to evaluation of umbrella species as conservation surrogates. Conservation Biology, 20, 15071515.

K.A. Poiani , M.D. Merrill & K.A Chapman . (2001) Identifying conservation-priority areas in a fragmented Minnesota landscape based on the umbrella species concept and selection of large patches of natural vegetation. Conservation Biology, 15, 513522.

J.M. Roberge & P Angelstam . (2004) Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology, 18, 7685.

M.M. Rowland , M.J. Wisdom , L.H. Suring & C.W Meinke . (2006) Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for sagebrush-associated vertebrates. Biological Conservation, 129, 323335.

A. Saunders & D.A Norton . (2001) Ecological restoration at Mainland Islands in New Zealand. Biological Conservation, 99, 109119.

F. Sergio , I. Newton , L. Marchesi & P Pedrini . (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 10491055.

D Simberloff . (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation, 83, 247257.

W. Suter , R.F. Graf & R Hess . (2002) Capercaillie (Tetrao urgallus) and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept. Conservation Biology, 16, 778788.

C.D Thomas . (1990) What do real population dynamics tell us about minimum viable population sizes? Conservation Biology, 4, 324327.

M.F Wallis de Vries . (1995) Large herbivores and the design of large-scale nature reserves in Western Europe. Conservation Biology, 9, 2533.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 23 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 182 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.