Skip to main content

Encouragement is not Enough: Addressing Social and Structural Barriers to Female Recruitment

  • Kelly Dittmar (a1)

Invite a woman to run for office. Based on findings that women are most responsive to and reliant on encouragement in making the decision to run for office, this invitation refrain is pervasive among those seeking greater gender parity in U.S. politics. For example, in 2007, the Women's Campaign Fund launched She Should Run, complete with an online tool that, to date, has been used to ask just under 200,000 women to run for office. In 2014, another organization, Vote Run Lead, adopted a similar strategy, launching Invitation Nation to send e-invitations to run to nearly 10,000 women within their first year of launching the project. My own organization, the Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP), has “invited” countless women to run for office through online communications, training programs, and recruitment campaigns and initiatives. While each of these organizations has also sought to provide potential women candidates with training, information, and resources to assist them throughout the recruitment process, our obsession with inviting can constrain a more complex and comprehensive approach to female candidate recruitment in both research and practice.

Hide All
Bledsoe, Timothy, and Herring, Mary. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.
Carroll, Susan J., and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 390413.
Dittmar, Kelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Frederick, Brian, and Burrell, Barbara. 2007. “Political Windows of Opportunity: Recruitment Pools, Gender Politics and Congressional Open Seats.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans.
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.
Lawless, Jennifer, and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moncrief, Gary F., Squire, Peverill, and Jewell, Malcolm E.. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Niven, David. 1998. The Missing Majority: The Recruitment of Women as State Legislative Candidates. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Niven, David. 2006. “Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 473–89.
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2012. Women and Congressional Elections: A Century of Change. Boulder: Lynne Reiner.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Scola, Becki. 2006. “Women of Color in State Legislatures: Gender, Race, Ethnicity and Legislative Office Holding.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (3/4): 4370.
Shames, Shauna. 2014. “The Rational Non-Candidate: A Theory of (Uneven) Candidate Deterrence.” Ph.D. diss. Harvard University.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 201 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1047 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.