Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Measuring diet in the 21st century: use of new technologies

  • Janet E. Cade (a1)
Abstract

The advent of the internet and smartphone technology has allowed dietary assessment to reach the 21st century! The variety of foods available on the supermarket shelf is now greater than ever before. New approaches to measuring diet may help to reduce measurement error and advance our understanding of nutritional determinants of disease. This advance provides the potential to capture detailed dietary data on large numbers of individuals without the need for costly and time-consuming manual nutrition coding. This aim of the present paper is to review the need for new technologies to measure diet with an overview of tools available. The three main areas will be addressed: (1) development of web-based tools to measure diet; (2) use of smartphone apps to self-monitor diet; (3) improving the quality of dietary assessment through development of an online library of tools. A practical example of the development of a web-based tool to assess diet myfood24 (www.myfood24.org) will be given exploring its potential, limitations and challenges. The development of a new food composition database using back-of-pack information will be described. Smartphone apps used to measure diet with a focus on obesity will be reviewed. Many apps are unreliable in terms of tracking, and most are not evaluated. Accurate and consistent measurement of diet is needed for public health and epidemiology. The choice of the most appropriate dietary assessment method tends to rely on experience. The DIET@NET partnership has developed best practice guidelines for selection of dietary assessment tools, which aim to improve the quality, consistency and comparability of dietary data. These developments provide us with a step-change in our ability to reliably characterise food and nutrient intake in population studies. The need for high-quality, validated systems will be important to fully realise the benefits of new technologies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Measuring diet in the 21st century: use of new technologies
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Measuring diet in the 21st century: use of new technologies
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Measuring diet in the 21st century: use of new technologies
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: J. E Cade, fax 0113 343 2982, email j.e.cade@leeds.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1. Carter, MC, Albar, SA, Morris, MA et al. (2015) Development of a UK Online 24-h Dietary Assessment Tool: myfood24. Nutrients 7, 40164032.
2. Chen, J, Cade, JE & Allman-Farinelli, M (2015) The most popular smartphone apps for weight loss: a quality assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 3, e104.
3. Health NIo (2016) Dietary Assessment Primer, Measurement Error. https://dietassessmentprimer.cancer.gov/ (accessed 20 July 2016).
4. Albar, SA, Carter, MC, Alwan, NA et al. (2015) Formative evaluation of the usability and acceptability of myfood24 among adolescents: a UK online dietary assessments tool. BMC Nutr 1, 111.
5. Freisling, H, van Bakel, MM, Biessy, C et al. (2012) Dietary reporting errors on 24 h recalls and dietary questionnaires are associated with BMI across six European countries as evaluated with recovery biomarkers for protein and potassium intake. Br J Nutr 107, 910920.
6. Boushey, CJ, Kerr, DA, Wright, J et al. (2009) Use of technology in children's dietary assessment. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, Suppl. 1, S50S57.
7. Jenab, M, Slimani, N, Bictash, M et al. (2009) Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons. Hum Genet 125, 507525.
8. Tabacchi, G, Amodio, E, Di Pasquale, M et al. (2014) Validation and reproducibility of dietary assessment methods in adolescents: a systematic literature review. Public Health Nutr 17, 27002714.
9. Dennis, LK, Snetselaar, LG, Nothwehr, FK et al. (2003) Developing a scoring method for evaluating dietary methodology in reviews of epidemiologic studies. J Acad Nutr Diet 103, 483487.
10. Office for National Statistics (2016) Internet users in the UK: 2016. Statistical Bulletin. London: Office for National Statistics.
11. Deloitte (2016) Mobile Consumer 2015: the UK Cut. London: Deloitte LLP.
12. Ofcom (2014) The Communications Market Report. London.
13. Fallaize, R, Forster, H, Macready, AL et al. (2014) Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record. J Med Internet Res 16, e190.
14. Hutchesson, MJ, Rollo, ME, Callister, R et al. (2015) Self-monitoring of dietary intake by young women: online food records completed on computer or smartphone are as accurate as paper-based food records but more acceptable. J Acad Nutr Diet 115, 8794.
15. Thompson, FE, Dixit-Joshi, S, Potischman, N et al. (2015) Comparison of interviewer-administered and automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recalls in 3 diverse integrated health systems. Am J Epidemiol 181, 970978.
16. Touvier, M, Kesse-Guyot, E, Mejean, C et al. (2011) Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr 105, 10551064.
17. Forster, H, Fallaize, R, Gallagher, C et al. (2014) Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 16, e150.
18. Kristal, AR, Kolar, AS, Fisher, JL et al. (2014) Evaluation of web-based, self-administered, graphical food frequency questionnaire. J Acad Nutr Diet 114, 613621.
19. Labonte, ME, Cyr, A, Baril-Gravel, L et al. (2012) Validity and reproducibility of a web-based, self-administered food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 166173.
20. Albar, SA, Alwan, NA, Evans, CE et al. (2016) Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11–18 years. Br J Nutr 115, 16781686.
21. Bradley, J, Simpson, E, Poliakov, I et al. (2016) Comparison of INTAKE24 (an online 24-h dietary recall tool) with interviewer-led 24-h recall in 11–24 year-old. Nutrients 8, 358.
22. Kirkpatrick, SI, Subar, AF, Douglass, D et al. (2014) Performance of the automated self-administered 24-hour recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr 100, 233240.
23. Hutchesson, MJ, Tan, CY, Morgan, P et al. (2016) Enhancement of self-monitoring in a web-based weight loss program by extra individualized feedback and reminders: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res 18, e82.
24. Liu, B, Young, H, Crowe, FL et al. (2011) Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies. Public Health Nutr 14, 19982005.
25. Finglas, PM, Roe, MA, Pinchen, H et al. (2015) McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 7th summary ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
26. Carter, MC, Hancock, N, Albar, SA et al. (2016) Development of a new branded UK food composition database for an online dietary assessment tool. Nutrients 8, 480.
27. Forster, H, Walsh, MC, Gibney, MJ et al. (2016) Personalised nutrition: the role of new dietary assessment methods. Proc Nutr Soc 75, 96105.
28. Arab, L, Tseng, CH, Ang, A et al. (2011) Validity of a multipass, web-based, 24-hour self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites. Am J Epidemiol 174, 12561265.
29. Hercberg, S, Castetbon, K, Czernichow, S et al. (2010) The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 10, 16.
30. Illner, AK, Freisling, H, Boeing, H et al. (2012) Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 41, 11871203.
31. Jia, W, Chen, HC, Yue, Y et al. (2014) Accuracy of food portion size estimation from digital pictures acquired by a chest-worn camera. Public Health Nutr 17, 16711681.
32. Astell, AJ, Hwang, F, Brown, LJ et al. (2014) Validation of the NANA (Novel Assessment of Nutrition and Ageing) touch screen system for use at home by older adults. Exp Gerontol 60, 100107.
33. Galante, J, Adamska, L, Young, A et al. (2016) The acceptability of repeat Internet-based hybrid diet assessment of previous 24-h dietary intake: administration of the Oxford WebQ in UK Biobank. Br J Nutr 115, 681686.
34. Hutchesson, MJ, Truby, H, Callister, R et al. (2013) Can a Web-based food record accurately assess energy intake in overweight and obese women? A pilot study. J Hum Nutr Diet 26, Suppl. 1, 140144.
35. Chen, J, Bauman, A & Allman-Farinelli, M (2016) A study to determine the most popular lifestyle smartphone applications and willingness of the public to share their personal data for health research. Telemed J E Health 22, 655665.
36. Breton, ER, Fuemmeler, BF & Abroms, LC (2011) Weight loss-there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices? Transl Behav Med 1, 523529.
37. Carter, MC, Burley, VJ, Nykjaer, C et al. (2013) Adherence to a smartphone application for weight loss compared to website and paper diary: pilot randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 15, e32.
38. Laing, BY, Mangione, CM, Tseng, CH et al. (2014) Effectiveness of a smartphone application for weight loss compared with usual care in overweight primary care patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 161, S5S12.
39. Eyles, H, McLean, R, Neal, B et al. (2014) Using mobile technology to support lower-salt food choices for people with cardiovascular disease: protocol for the SaltSwitch randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 14, 950.
40. Dunford, E, Trevena, H, Goodsell, C et al. (2014) FoodSwitch: a mobile phone app to enable consumers to make healthier food choices and crowdsourcing of national food composition data. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2, e37.
41. Albar, S, Robinson, S, Alwan, N et al. (2016) P29 Best practice guidance for dietary assessment in research: DIET@NET Guidelines. J Epidemiol Community Health 70, A66A67.
42. Lachat, C, Hawwash, D, Ocke, MC et al. (2016) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology-nutritional epidemiology (STROBE-nut): an extension of the STROBE statement. PLoS Med 13, e1002036.
43. Gemming, L, Utter, J & Ni Mhurchu, C (2015) Image-assisted dietary assessment: a systematic review of the evidence. J Acad Nutr Diet 115, 6477.
44. Drewnowski, A & Kawachi, I (2015) Diets and health: how food decisions are shaped by biology, economics, geography, and social interactions. Big Data 3, 193197.
45. Beasley, JM, Davis, A & Riley, WT (2009) Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire. Public Health Nutr 12, 651659.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 72
Total number of PDF views: 538 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1357 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th December 2016 - 18th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.