Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T03:12:38.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-collapsing in homogeneity greater than one via a two-point method for a special case

Part of: Partial differential equations Global differential geometry Partial differential equations on manifolds; differential operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2019

Heiko Kröner
Heiko Kröner*
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg, Department of Mathematics, Bundesstraße 55, 20146 Hamburg, Germany (heiko.kroener@math.uni-freiburg.de)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the mechanism of proving non-collapsing in the context of extrinsic curvature flows via the maximum principle in combination with a suitable two-point function in homogeneity greater than one. Our paper serves as the first step in this direction and we consider the case of a curve which is C2-close to a circle initially and which flows by a power greater than one of the curvature along its normal vector.

Keywords

geometric evolution equationmaximum principle

MSC classification

Primary: 53C44: Geometric evolution equations (mean curvature flow, Ricci flow, etc.)
Secondary: 58J35: Heat and other parabolic equation methods 35B50: Maximum principles

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 149 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 1627 - 1635
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Andrews, B.. Evolving convex curves. Calc. Var. 7 (1998), 315–371.Google Scholar
2Andrews, B.. Gauss curvature flow: the fate of the rolling stones. Invent. math. 138 (1999), 151–161.Google Scholar
3Andrews, B.. Classification of limiting shapes for isotropic curve flows. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), 443–459.Google Scholar
4Andrews, B.. Non-collapsing in mean-convex mean curvature flow. Geom. Topol. 16 (2012), 1413–1418.Google Scholar
5Andrews, B., Li, H.. Embedded constant mean curvature tori in the three-sphere. J. Differ. Geom. 99 (2015), 169–189.Google Scholar
6Andrews, B. and McCoy, J.. Convex hypersurfaces with pinched principal curvatures and flow of convex hypersurfaces by high powers of curvature. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 3427–3447.Google Scholar
7Andrews, B., Langford, M. and McCoy, J.. Non-collapsing in fully nonlinear curvature flows. Annales de I'Institut Henri Poincare/Analyse non lineaire 30 (2013), 23–32.Google Scholar
8Brendle, S.. Embedded minimal tori in S 3 and the Lawson conjecture. Acta Math. 211 (2013), 177–190.Google Scholar
9Brendle, S.. Two-point functions and their applications in geometry. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., New Ser. 51 (2014), 581–596.Google Scholar
10Brendle, S.. A sharp bound for the inscribed radius under mean curvature flow. Invent. Math. 202 (2015), 217–237.Google Scholar
11Brendle, S.. An inscribed radius estimate for mean curvature flow in Riemannian manifolds. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci. (5) 16 (2016), 1447–1472.Google Scholar
12Haslhofer, R. and Kleiner, B.. On Brendle's estimate for the inscribed radius under mean curvature flow. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2015 (2015), 6558–6561.Google Scholar
13Haslhofer, R. and Kleiner, B.. Mean curvature flow with surgery. Duke Math. J. 166 (2017a), 1591–1626.Google Scholar
14Haslhofer, R. and Kleiner, B.. Mean curvature flow of mean-convex hypersurfaces. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 70 (2017b), 511–546.Google Scholar
15Gage, M. E.. Curve shortening makes convex curves circular. Invent. Math. 76 (1984), 357–364.Google Scholar
16Gage, M. and Hamilton, R. S.. The heat equation shrinking convex plane curves. J. Diff. Geom. 23 (1986), 69–96.Google Scholar
17Grayson, M. A.. The heat equation shrinks embedded plane curves to round points. J. Differ. Geom. 26 (1987), 285–314.Google Scholar
18Huisken, G.. Flow by mean curvature of convex surfaces into spheres. J. Differ. Geom. 20 (1984), 117–138.Google Scholar
19Ju, H. and Liu, Y.. Non-collapsing for a fully nonlinear inverse curvature flow. Comm. Pure Appl. Anal. 16 (2017), 945–952.Google Scholar
20Liu, Y.. Inscribed radius estimates for inverse curvature flow in sphere and hyperbolic space. Nonlin. Anal. 155 (2017), 198–206.Google Scholar
21Schulze, F.. Evolution of convex hypersurfaces by powers of the mean curvature. Math. Z. 251 (2005), 721–733.Google Scholar
22Schulze, F.. Convexity estimates for flows by powers of the mean curvature. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci (5) 5 (2006), 261–277.Google Scholar
23Schulze, F.. Nonlinear evolution by mean curvature and isoperimetric inequalities. J. Diff. Geom. 79 (2008), 197–241.Google Scholar
24Sheng, W. and Wang, X.-J.. Singularity profile in the mean curvature flow. Methods Appl. Anal. 16 (2009), 139–155.Google Scholar
25White, B.. The size of the singular set in mean curvature flow of mean-convex sets. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (2000), 665–695 (electronic).Google Scholar