No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 October 2021
In this article, we give a comprehensive characterization of  $L^1$-summability for the Navier-Stokes flows in the half space, which is a long-standing problem. The main difficulties are that
$L^1$-summability for the Navier-Stokes flows in the half space, which is a long-standing problem. The main difficulties are that  $L^q-L^r$ estimates for the Stokes flow don't work in this end-point case:
$L^q-L^r$ estimates for the Stokes flow don't work in this end-point case:  $q=r=1$; the projection operator
$q=r=1$; the projection operator  $P: L^1\longrightarrow L^1_\sigma$ is not bounded any more; useful information on the pressure function is missing, which arises in the net force exerted by the fluid on the noncompact boundary. In order to achieve our aims, by making full use of the special structure of the half space, we decompose the pressure function into two parts. Then the knotty problem of handling the pressure term can be transformed into establishing a crucial and new weighted
$P: L^1\longrightarrow L^1_\sigma$ is not bounded any more; useful information on the pressure function is missing, which arises in the net force exerted by the fluid on the noncompact boundary. In order to achieve our aims, by making full use of the special structure of the half space, we decompose the pressure function into two parts. Then the knotty problem of handling the pressure term can be transformed into establishing a crucial and new weighted  $L^1$-estimate, which plays a fundamental role. In addition, we overcome the unboundedness of the projection
$L^1$-estimate, which plays a fundamental role. In addition, we overcome the unboundedness of the projection  $P$ by solving an elliptic problem with homogeneous Neumann boundary condition.
$P$ by solving an elliptic problem with homogeneous Neumann boundary condition.
 $L^2$ decay for the Navier-Stokes flow in half-spaces. Math. Ann. 282 (1988), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$L^2$ decay for the Navier-Stokes flow in half-spaces. Math. Ann. 282 (1988), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $L^p$-theory of the Stokes equation in a half-space. J. Evol. Equ. 1 (2001), 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$L^p$-theory of the Stokes equation in a half-space. J. Evol. Equ. 1 (2001), 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $L^1$-summability and asymptotic profiles for smooth solutions to Navier-Stokes equations in a 3D exterior domain. Math. Z. 245 (2003), 387–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$L^1$-summability and asymptotic profiles for smooth solutions to Navier-Stokes equations in a 3D exterior domain. Math. Z. 245 (2003), 387–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $R^3$. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 131 (2001), 597–619.Google Scholar
$R^3$. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 131 (2001), 597–619.Google Scholar $L^p$-Solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation in
$L^p$-Solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation in  $R^m$, with applications to weak solutions. Math. Z. 187 (1984), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$R^m$, with applications to weak solutions. Math. Z. 187 (1984), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $L^2$ decay for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 88 (1985), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$L^2$ decay for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 88 (1985), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $H^m$ spaces. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 20 (1995), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$H^m$ spaces. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 20 (1995), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $\mathbb {R}^N$. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. XL (1987), 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\mathbb {R}^N$. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. XL (1987), 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $R^n$. J.London Math. Soc. 2 (1987), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$R^n$. J.London Math. Soc. 2 (1987), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar