Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World: A New Dataset

  • Pippa Norris (a1), Richard W. Frank (a2) and Ferran Martínez i Coma (a3)
Abstract

Many contentious elections end in disputes about alleged fraud, irregularities, and malpractices. How do we know when these claims are valid and when they are false complaints from sore losers? This article describes a new dataset developed by the Electoral Integrity Project. Based on a survey of election experts, the research provides new evidence to compare how national contests around the world are meeting international standards of electoral integrity. The questionnaire includes 49 key indicators clustered into 11 stages of the electoral cycle, as well as generating an overall summary Perception of Electoral Integrity (PEI) 100-point index. The evidence displays high levels of external validity, internal validity, and legitimacy. The PEI datasets allow researchers to gauge the perceived quality of elections worldwide. This study summarizes the PEI’s research design, compares the quality of elections around the globe, and illustrates how electoral integrity is linked with both democracy and development.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World: A New Dataset
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World: A New Dataset
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World: A New Dataset
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Alvarez, R. Michael, Rae Atkeson, Lonna, and Hall, Thad. 2012. Evaluating Elections: A Handbook of Methods and Standards. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Christopher J., Blais, Andre, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Birch, Sarah. 2012. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.essex.ac.uk/government/electoralmalpractice/index.htm;
Bishop, Sylvia, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2014. “Free and Fair Elections: A New Database.” Oxford: Center for the Study of African Economies (CSAE) Working Paper WPS/2014-14.
Boix, Carles, Miller, Michael, and Rossano, David. 2012. “A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies 46(12): 1523–54.
Carroll, David J., and Davis-Roberts, Avery. 2013. “The Carter Center and Election Observation: An Obligations-based Approach for Assessing Elections.” Election Law Journal 12(1): 8793.
Coppedge, Michael, and Gerring, John, with Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 247–67.
Daxecker, Ursula E., and Schneider, Gerald. 2014. “Electoral Monitoring.” In Advancing Electoral Integrity, eds. Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard W., and Martínez i Coma, Ferran. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, Michael, and Mitchell, Paul. 2008. The Politics of Electoral Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Garzia, Diego. 2013. “The 2013 Italian Parliamentary Election: Changing Things So Everything Stays the Same.” West European Politics 36(5): 10951105.
Hall, Thad E. 2013. “US Voter Registration Reform.” Electoral Studies 32(4): 589–96.
Hasen, Richard L. 2012. The Voting Wars: From Florida 2000 to the Next Election Meltdown. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hyde, Susan D., and Marinov, Nikolay. 2012. Codebook for National Elections across Democracy and Autocracy (NELDA) 1945–2010. Version 3. http://hyde.research.yale.edu/nelda/
Hyde, Susan D. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrat’s Dilemma. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
James, Toby S. 2012. Elite Statecraft and Election Administration: Bending the Rules of the Game. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kelley, Judith. 2010. Quality of Elections Data Codebook . http://sites.duke.edu/kelley/data/;
Kelley, Judith. 2012. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works and Why it Often Fails. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Linz, Juan, and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69105.
Martínez i Coma, Ferran, and Frank, Richard W.. 2014. “Expert Judgments.” In Advancing Electoral Integrity. eds. Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard W., and Martínez i Coma, Ferran. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mebane, Walter R. Jr. 2012. “Comment on ‘Benford’s Law and the Detection of Election Fraud.’Political Analysis 19(3): 269–72.
Minnite, Lorraine Carol. 2010. The Myth of Voter Fraud. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press;
Norris, Pippa, Martínez i Coma, Ferran, and Frank, Richard W.. 2013. “Assessing the Quality of Elections.” Journal of Democracy 24(4): 124–35.
Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard W., and Martínez i Coma, Ferran, eds. 2014. Advancing Electoral Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 2013. “Does the World Agree about Standards of Electoral Integrity? Evidence for the Diffusion of Global Norms.” Electoral Studies 32(4): 576–88.
Norris, Pippa. 2014. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa. Forthcoming. Why Elections Fail. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Öhman, Magnus, and Zainulbhai, Hani. 2011. Political Finance Regulation: The Global Experience. Washington, DC: International Foundation for Electoral Systems.
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR). 2013. Republic of Azerbaijan Presidential Elections 9 October 2013 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE). 2013. Presidential Election in Azerbaijan: Joint Statement by PACE and EP Delegations. http://www.assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/News/News-View-EN.asp?newsid=4699&lang=2&cat=31.
Presidential Commission on Election Administration. 2014. The American Voting Experience: Report and Recommendations of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration. https://www.supportthevoter.gov.
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Antonio Cheibub, Jose, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schedler, Andreas. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Mexico City: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económica (CIDE).
Schedler, Andreas. 2012. “Judgment and Measurement in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 10(1): 2136.
Simpser, Alberto. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Teorell, Jan, Charron, Nicholas, Dahlberg, Stefan, Holmberg, Sören, Rothstein, Bo, Sundin, Petrus, and Svensson, Richard. 2013. “The Quality of Government Dataset, version 20 Dec13.” Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, the Quality of Government Institute. http://www.qog.pol.gu.se/data/datadownloads/qogstandarddata/
Wang, Tova Andrea. 2012. The Politics of Voter Suppression: Defending and Expanding Americans’ Right to Vote. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed