Skip to main content
×
Home

A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy detects variation in diet and differences by sociodemographic factors

  • Lisa M Bodnar (a1) (a2) and Anna Maria Siega-Riz (a1) (a2) (a3)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

Methods currently used to assess nutritional status during pregnancy have limitations if one wishes to examine the overall quality of the diet. A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy (DQI-P) was developed to reflect current nutritional recommendations for pregnancy and national dietary guidelines.

Design:

Dietary intake was assessed during the second trimester using a food-frequency questionnaire. The DQI-P includes eight components: % recommended servings of grains, vegetables and fruits, % recommendations for folate, iron and calcium, % energy from fat, and meal/snack patterning score. Scores can range from 0 to 80; each component contributed 10 points.

Setting:

Two public prenatal clinics in central North Carolina.

Subjects:

N = 2063 pregnant women who participated in the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition (PIN) Study.

Results:

The DQI-P quantitatively differentiated diets. The mean score for the population was 56.0 (standard deviation 12.0). Women who were <30 years old, <350% of poverty, nulliparous and high school graduates had significantly higher overall DQI-P scores. Higher percentages of recommended vegetable servings were consumed by higher-income, older and better-educated women. Greater percentages of recommended intakes of folate and iron were seen among black, low-income and nulliparous women. Higher iron intakes were also seen among women who graduated high school and were less than 30 years old. Other differences were observed for intake of fat and meal/snack pattern. Because this index was based on national recommendations, the DQI-P may be a useful tool for research and public health settings to evaluating overall diet quality of pregnant women.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy detects variation in diet and differences by sociodemographic factors
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy detects variation in diet and differences by sociodemographic factors
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy detects variation in diet and differences by sociodemographic factors
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email lisa_bodnar@unc.edu
References
Hide All
1Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. Nutrition during Pregnancy: Weight Gain and Nutrient Supplements. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
2Koblinsky MA. Beyond maternal mortality – magnitude, interrelationship, and consequences of women's health, pregnancy-related complications and nutritional status on pregnancy outcomes. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1995; 48: S21–32.
3Haines PS, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The Diet Quality Index Revised: a measurement instrument for populations. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999; 99: 697704.
4Patterson RE, Haines PS, Popkin BM. Diet Quality Index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1994; 94: 5764.
5Kennedy ET, Ohis F, Carlson S, Fleming K. The Healthy Eating Index: design and applications. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1995; 95: 1103–8.
6Basiotis PP, Guthrie JF, Bowman SA, Welsh SO. Construction and evaluation of a Diet Status Index. Farm. Econ. Nutr. Rev. 1995; 8(2): 213.
7US Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 5th ed [Online]. Available at http://www.usda.gov/cnpp/DietGd.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2001
8Shaw A, Fulton L, Savis C, Hogbin M. Using the Food Guide Pyramid: A Resource for Nutrition Educators [Online]. Available at http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/Fpyr/guide.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2001.
9Food Surveys Research Group, Agriculture Research Service (ARS). 1994 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) 1994 [CD-ROM]. Disks 1 and 2. Riverdale, MD: ARS, 1994.
10US Department of Agriculture. USDA Nutrient Data Base for Standard Reference, Release *12. Riverdale, MD: Agriculture Research Service, 1998.
11Block G, DiSogra C. WIC Dietary Assessment Validation Study. Final Report. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1995.
12Block G, Coyle LM, Hartman AM, Scoppa SM. Revision of dietary analysis software for the health habits and history questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994; 139: 1190–6.
13Block G, Thompson FE, Hartman AM, Larkin FA, Guire KE. Comparison of two dietary questionnaires validated against multiple dietary records collected during a 1-year period. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1992; 92: 686–93.
14Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C. Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1990; 43: 1327–35.
15Subar AF, Thompson FE, Smith AF, Jobe JB, Ziegler RG. Improving food frequency questionnaires: a qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1995; 95: 781–8.
16National Cancer Institute. Dietsys Software Version 4.0 for Block–NCI HHHQ [Online]. Available at http://www.nutritionquest.com.
17National Cancer Institute (NCI). 5-A-Day for Better Health. RFA No. CA-92-17: Bethesda, MD: NCI, 1992.
18National Research Council, Subcommittee on the 10th Edition of the RDAs, Food and Nutrition Board, Commission on Life Sciences. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.
19Kopp-Hoolihan LE, van Loan MD, Wong WW, King JC. Longitudinal assessment of energy balance in well-nourished, pregnant women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 69: 697704.
20Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
21Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B-6, Folate, Vitamin B-12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.
22Yates AA, Schlicker SA, Suitor CW. Dietary Reference Intakes: the new basis for recommendations for calcium and related nutrients, B vitamins, and choline. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998; 98: 699706.
23Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
24Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.
25Institute of Medicine, Committee on Nutritional Status during Pregnancy and Lactation, Food and Nutrition Board, Subcommittee for Clinical Application Guide. Nutrition during Pregnancy and Lactation: An Implementation Guide. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
26Siega-Riz AM, Herrmann TS, Savitz DA, Thorp J. The frequency of eating during pregnancy and its effect on preterm delivery. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001; 153: 647–52.
27Lawrence KM, James N, Miller MH, Tennant GB, Campbell H. Double-blind randomized controlled trial of folate treatment before conception to prevent recurrence of neural-tube defects. Br. Med. J. 1981; 282: 1509–11.
28Scholl TO, Hediger ML, Schall JI, Khoo C, Fisher RL. Dietary and serum folate: their influence on the outcome of pregnancy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 63: 520–5.
29Siega-Riz AM, Bodnar LM, Savitz DA. What are pregnant women eating? Nutrient and food group differences by race. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 186: 480–6.
30Goldenberg RL, Tamura T, Neggers Y, Copper RL, Johnston KE, DuBard MB, et al. The effect of zinc supplementation on pregnancy outcome. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1995; 274: 463–8.
31Neggers YH, Cutter GR, Acton RT, Alvarez JO, Bonner JL, Goldenberg RL, et al. A positive association between maternal serum zinc concentration and birth weight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990; 51: 678–84.
32Rosner B, Gore R. Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiology based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001; 154: 827–35.
33Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Selvin S, Schaffer DM. Diet quality and risk of neural tube defects [abstract]. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000; 151(11): S6.
34Philipps C, Johnson NE. The impact of quality of diet and other factors on birth weight of infants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1977; 30: 215–25.
35Burke BS, Beal VA, Kirkwood SB, Stuart HC. Nutrition studies during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1943; 46: 3852.
36Loris P, Dewey KG, Poirier-Brode K. Weight gain and dietary intake of pregnant teenagers. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1985; 85(10): 1296–305.
37Haste FM, Brooke OG, Anderson HR, Bland JM, Peacock JL. Social determinants of nutrient intake in smokers and non-smokers during pregnancy. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1990; 44: 205–9.
38Haste FM, Brooke OG, Anderson HR, Bland JM, Shaw JM, Griffin J, Peacock JL. Nutrient intakes during pregnancy: observations on the influence of smoking and social class. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990; 51: 2936.
39Block G, Abrams G. Vitamin and mineral status of women of childbearing potential. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1993; 678: 244–54.
40Skinner JD, Carruth BR, Pope J, Varner L, Goldberg D. Food and nutrient intake of white, pregnant adolescents. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1992; 92(9): 1127–9.
41Endres J, Dunning S, Poon S, Welch P, Duncan H. Older pregnant women and adolescents: nutrition data after enrollment in WIC. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1987; 87(8): 1011–9.
42Lenders CM, McElrath TF, Scholl TO. Nutrition in adolescent pregnancy. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2000; 12: 291–6.
43Suitor CW, Gardner JD, Feldstein ML. Characteristics of diet among culturally diverse group of low-income pregnant women. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1990; 90: 543–9.
44Rush D, Sloan NL, Leighton J, Alvir JM, Horvitz DG, Seaver WBV, et al. Longitudinal study of pregnant women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988; 48: 439–83.
45NDS-R Software, © Regents of the University of Minnesota Nutrition Coordinating Center. All Rights Reserved.
46Lewis CJ, Crane NT, Wilson DB, Yetley EA. Estimated folate intakes: data updated to reflect food fortification, increased bioavailability, and dietary supplement use. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 70: 189207.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 320 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 356 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.