Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The global context for public health nutrition taxation

  • Anne Marie Thow (a1), Peter Heywood (a2), Stephen Leeder (a1) and Lee Burns (a3)

To assess critically the scope for public health nutrition taxation within the framework of the global tax reform agenda.


Review of the tax policy literature for global policy priorities relevant to public health nutrition taxation; critical analysis of proposals for public health nutrition taxation judged against the global agenda for tax reform.


The global tax reform agenda shapes decisions of tax policy makers in all countries. By understanding this agenda, public health nutritionists can make feasible taxation proposals and thus improve the development, uptake and implementation of recommendations for nutrition-related taxation.


The priorities of the global tax reform agenda relevant to public health nutrition taxation are streamlining of taxes, adoption of value-added tax (VAT), minimisation of excise taxes (except to correct for externalities) and removal of import taxes in line with trade liberalisation policies. Proposals consistent with the global tax reform agenda have included excise taxes, extension of VAT to currently exempted (unhealthy) foods and tariff reductions for healthy foods.


Proposals for public health nutrition taxation should (i) use existing types and rates of taxes where possible, (ii) use excise taxes that specifically address externalities, (iii) avoid differential VAT on foods and (iv) use import taxes in ways that comply with trade liberalisation priorities.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The global context for public health nutrition taxation
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The global context for public health nutrition taxation
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The global context for public health nutrition taxation
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email
Hide All
1.World Health Organization (2008) 2008–2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: WHO.
2.Powell LM & Chaloupka FJ (2009) Food prices and obesity: evidence and policy implications for taxes and subsidies. Milbank Q 87, 229257.
3.Magnusson R (2008) What’s law got to do with it? Part 2: legal strategies for healthier nutrition and obesity prevention. Aust N Z Health Policy 5, 11.
4.Popkin B (2002) An overview on the nutrition transition and its health implications: the Bellagio meeting. Public Health Nutr 5, 93103.
5.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR.
6.World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of the Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. WHO: Geneva.
7.Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB & Brownell KD (2007) Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 97, 667675.
8.Pereira M, Kartashov AI, Ebbeling CB et al. (2005) Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet 365, 3642.
9.Thow AM, Jan S, Leeder S et al. (2010) The impact of fiscal policy interventions for diets, obesity and chronic disease: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ (Epublication ahead of print version).
10.Cawley J (2004) An economic framework for understanding physical activity and eating behaviors. Am J Prev Med 27, 117125.
11.Finkelstein E, French S, Variyam JN et al. (2004) Pros and cons of proposed interventions to promote healthy eating. Am J Prev Med 27, 163171.
12.Cash SB & Lacanilao R (2008) An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Fat Taxes: Price Effects, Food Stigma, and Information Effects on Economic Instruments to Improve Dietary Health. Edmonton, Canada: Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta.
13.Chriqui JF, Eidson SS, Bates H et al. (2008) State sales tax rates for soft drinks and snacks sold through grocery stores and vending machines, 2007. J Public Health Policy 29, 226249.
14.Thow AM, Quested C, Juventin L et al. (2010) Soft drink taxes in the Pacific: lessons on implementation. Health Promot Int (In the Press).
15.Caraher M & Cowburn C (2005) Taxing food: implications for public health nutrition. Public Health Nutr 8, 12421249.
16.Leicester A & Windmeijer F (2004) The ‘Fat Tax’: Economic Incentives to Reduce Obesity. Briefing Note no. 49. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
17.Hawkes C (2009) Identifying innovative interventions to promote healthy eating using consumption-oriented food supply chain analysis. J Hunger Environ Nutr 4, 336356.
18.Stewart M (2002) Global Trajectories of Tax Reform: Mapping Tax Reform in Developing and Transition Countries. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne Faculty of Law.
19.Nugent R & Knaul F (2006) Fiscal policies for health promotion and disease prevention. In Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries, 2nd ed., pp. 211223 [D Jamison, J Breman, A Measham et al., editors]. Washington, DC: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.
20.Zatonski WA, McMichael AJ & Powles JW (1998) Ecological study of reasons for sharp decline in mortality from ischaemic heart disease in Poland since 1991. BMJ 316, 10471051.
21.Taxation Review Committee (1975) Full Report, at paragraphs 3.6–3.28. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
22.Bahl R & Bird R (2008) Tax policy in developing countries: looking back – and forward. Natl Tax J LXI, 279301.
23.Freebairn J (1997) Options and prospects for taxation reform. Econ Rec 73, 373386.
24.Garber HD (1988) The role of consumption taxes in tax reform around the world. Natl Tax J 41, 357364.
25.World Bank (1991) Lessons of Tax Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.
26.Abed G (1998) Fiscal Reforms in Low-Income Countries: Experience under IMF-Supported Programs. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
27.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008) Consumption Tax Trends 2008: VAT/GST and Excise Rates, Trends and Administration Issues. Paris: OECD.
28.International Monetary Fund (1995) Guidelines for Fiscal Adjustment. Pamphlet Series no. 49. Washington, DC: IMF; available at
29.Cnossen S (1998) Global trends and issues in Value Added Taxation. Int Tax Pub Finance 5, 399428.
30.Gemmell N & Morrissey O (2005) Distribution and poverty impacts of tax structure reform in developing countries: how little we know. Dev Policy Rev 23, 131144.
31.Thirsk W (1991) Lessons from Tax Reform: An Overview. Washington, DC: World Bank.
32.World Trade Organization (2007) Understanding the WTO. Geneva: WTO.
33.Burns L (2007) VAT in the Pacific. In GST in Retrospect and Prospect, pp. 515528 [R Krever and D White, editors]. New Zealand: Thomson Brookers.
34.Bolnick B & Haughton J (1998) Tax policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Examining the Role of Excise Taxation. Boston, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.
35.Cnossen S (2007) The role and rationale of excise duties in the ASEAN countries. In Excise Taxation in Asia, pp. 124 [SL Phua, editor]. Singapore: Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore.
36.Cnossen S (2005) Economics and politics of excise taxation. In Theory and Practice of Excise Taxation: Smoking, Drinking, Gambling, Polluting, and Driving, pp. 119 [S Cnossen, editor]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.James S & Edwards A (2008) Developing tax policy in a complex and changing world. Econ Anal Policy 38, 3553.
38.Brownell KD & Frieden TR (2009) Ounces of prevention – the public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages. N Engl J Med 360, 18051808.
39.Clarke D & McKenzie T (2007) Legislative Interventions to Prevent and Decrease Obesity in Pacific Island Countries. Auckland: Allen and Clarke, Policy and Regulatory Specialists Limited.
40.Bahl R, Bird R & Walker MB (2003) The uneasy case against discriminatory excise taxation: soft drink taxes in Ireland. Public Financ Rev 31, 510533.
41.Gustavsen G (2005) Public policies and the demand for carbonated soft drinks: a censored quantile regression approach. Presented at XIth Congress of the EAAE (European Association of Agricultural Economists), ‘The Future of Rural Europe in the Global Agri-Food System’, Copenhagen, Denmark, 24–27 August 2005.
42.Nordström J & Thunström L (2007) The Impact of Tax Reforms Designed to Encourage a Healthier Grain Consumption. Umeå: Umeå University.
43.Tefft N (2008) The effects of a soft drink tax on household expenditures.
44.Welegtabit S (2001) Food Security Strategies for Vanuatu. Bogor, Indonesia: The Regional Co-ordination Centre for Research and Development of Roots and Tuber Crops in the Humid Tropics of Asia and the Pacific.
45.Thow AM (2009) Trade liberalisation and the nutrition transition: mapping the pathways for public health nutritionists. Public Health Nutr 12, 21502158.
46.World Bank (2006) Repositioning Nutrition as Central to Development: A Strategy for Large-Scale Action. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
47.Jensen JD & Smed S (2007) Cost-effective design of economic instruments in nutrition policy. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4, 10.
48.Santarossa JM & Mainland DD (2003) Employing an environmental taxation mechanism to reduce fat intake. In Health, Nutrition and Food Demand, pp. 223245 [WS Chern and K Rickertson, editors]. Oxford: CABI Publishing.
49.Boizot-Szantaï C & Etilé F (2005) The Food Prices/Body Mass Index Relationship: Theory and Evidence from a Sample of French Adults. France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.
50.Laurance J (2009) Time for a fat tax? Lancet 373, 1597.
51.Fantuzzi K (2008) Carbonated soft drink consumption: implications for obesity policy. PhD Thesis, University of Connecticut.
52.Gelbach JB, Klick J & Stratmann T (2007) Cheap Donuts and Expensive Broccoli: The Effect of Relative Prices on Obesity. Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona; available at
53.Schroeter C, Lusk J & Tyner W (2008) Determining the impact of food price and income changes on body weight. J Health Econ 27, 4568.
54.Chouinard H, Davis D, LaFrance JT et al. (2007) Fat taxes: big money for small change. Forum Health Econ Policy 10(2).
55.Frazao E & Allshouse J (2003) Strategies for intervention: commentary and debate. J Nutr 133, 844S847S.
56.Gostin LO (2007) Law as a tool to facilitate healthier lifestyles and prevent obesity. JAMA 297, 8790.
57.Nestle M & Jacobson MF (2000) Halting the obesity epidemic: a public health policy approach. Public Health Rep 115, 1224.
58.Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC et al. (2009) The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. N Engl J Med 361, 15991605.
59.Gabe T (2008) Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Beverage Excise Taxes Imposed by Maine Public Law 629. Orono, ME: School of Economics, University of Maine.
60.Kuchler F, Tegene A & Harris JM (2004) Taxing snack foods: what to expect for diet and tax revenues. Agriculture Information Bulletin, United States Department of Agriculture 747–08, 111.
61.Kuchler F, Tegene A & Harris JM (2005) Taxing snack foods: manipulating diet quality or financing information programs. Rev Agric Econ 27, 420.
62.Nnoaham K, Sacks G, Rayner M et al. (2009) Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies. Int J Epidemiol 38, 13241333.
63.Mytton O, Gray A, Rayner M et al. (2007) Could targeted food taxes improve health? J Epidemiol Community Health 61, 689694.
64.Marshall T (2000) Exploring a fiscal food policy: the case of diet and ischaemic heart disease. BMJ 320, 301305.
65.Allais O, Bertail P & Nichèle V (2008) The effects of a ‘Fat Tax’ on the nutrient intake of french households.
66.Fletcher JM, Frisvold D & Tefft N (2010) Can soft drink taxes reduce population weight? Contemp Econ Policy 28, 2335.
67.Oaks B (2005) An Evaluation of the Snack Tax on the Obesity Rate of Maine. Texas State University Public Administration Program, Applied Research Projects. (accessed July 2010).
68.Kim D & Kawachi I (2006) Food taxation and pricing strategies to ‘thin out’ the obesity epidemic. Am J Prev Med 30, 430437.
69.Smed S, Jensen JD & Denver S (2007) Socio-economic characteristics and the effect of taxation as a health policy instrument. Food Policy 32, 624639.
70.Jacobson MF & Brownell KD (2000) Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health. Am J Public Health 90, 854857.
71.Wallerstein C (1997) Junk-food boost for health in Philippines. Lancet 351, 734.
72.Cash S & Lacanilao RD (2007) Taxing food to improve health: economic evidence and arguments. Agric Resour Econ Rev 36, 174182.
73.Jones MW (2005) The Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement: A California Perspective. Sacramento, CA: Government of the State of California.
74.Strnad J (2005) Conceptualizing the ‘Fat Tax’: The Role of Food Taxes in Developed Economies. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper no. 286. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Law School.
75.UK Food Standards Agency (2009) Signposting.
76.Haines A, Smith KR, Anderson D et al. (2007) Policies for accelerating access to clean energy, improving health, advancing development, and mitigating climate change. Lancet 370, 12641281.
77.Andreyeva T, Long MW & Brownell KD (2010) The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health 100, 216222.
78.Seale J, Regmi A & Bernstein J (2003) International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns. Washington, DC: USDA, Economic Research Service.
79.International Tax and Investment Centre & Oxford Economics (2008) The Economic Benefits of the Reduction in Sales Tax on Soft Drinks in Egypt. Oxford: ITIC & Oxford Economics; available at
80.Hamm G (2006) Mexicans all shook up over soft drink tax plan. Reuters AlertNet (Mexico City), 20 December.
81.Rose SM & Hatzenbuehler S (2009) Embodying social class: the link between poverty, income inequality and health. Int Soc Work 52, 459471.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 168 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 513 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.