Skip to main content
×
Home

Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk

  • Sheila A Bingham (a1) (a2), Ailsa A Welch (a1), Alison McTaggart (a1), Angela A Mulligan (a1), Shirley A Runswick (a2), Robert Luben (a1), Suzy Oakes (a1), Kay Tee Khaw (a1) (a3), Nicholas Wareham (a1) (a3) and Nicholas E Day (a1)...
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

To describe methods and dietary habits of a large population cohort.

Design:

Prospective assessment of diet using diet diaries and food-frequency questionnaires, and biomarkers of diet in 24-h urine collections and blood samples.

Setting:

Free living individuals aged 45 to 75 years living in Norfolk, UK.

Subjects:

Food and nutrient intake from a food-frequency questionnaire on 23 003 men and women, and from a 7-day diet diary from 2117 men and women. Nitrogen, sodium and potassium excretion was obtained from single 24-h urine samples from 300 individuals in the EPIC cohort. Plasma vitamin C was measured for 20 846 men and women.

Results:

The food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and the food diary were able to determine differences in foods and nutrients between the sexes and were reliable as judged by repeated administrations of each method. Plasma vitamin C was significantly higher in women than men. There were significant (P<0.001) differences in mean intake of all nutrients measured by the two different methods in women but less so in men. The questionnaire overestimated dairy products and vegetables in both men and women when compared with intakes derived from the diary, but underestimated cereal and meat intake in men. There were some consistent trends with age in food and nutrient intakes assessed by both methods, particularly in men. Correlation coefficients between dietary intake assessed from the diary and excretion of nitrogen and potassium in a single 24-h urine sample ranged from 0.36 to 0.47. Those comparing urine excretion and intake assessed from the FFQ were 0.09 to 0.26. The correlations between plasma vitamin C and dietary intake from the first FFQ, 24-h recall or diary were 0.28, 0.35 and 0.40.

Conclusions:

EPIC Norfolk is one of the largest epidemiological studies of nutrition in the UK and the largest on which plasma vitamin C has been obtained. Methods for obtaining food and nutrient intake are described in detail. The results shown here for food and nutrient intakes can be compared with results from other population studies utilising different methods of assessing dietary intake. The utility of different methods used in different settings within the main EPIC cohort is described. The FFQ is to be used particularly in pooled analyses of risk from diet in relation to cancer incidence within the larger European EPIC study, where measurement error is more likely to be overcome by large dietary heterogeneity on an international basis. Findings in the UK, where dietary variation between individuals is smaller and hence the need to use a more accurate individual method greater, will be derived from the 7-day diary information on a nested case–control basis. 24-h recalls can be used in the event that diary information should not be forthcoming from some eventual cases. Combinations of results utilising all dietary methods and biomarkers may also be possible.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email Sheila.Bingham@mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1Doll R, Peto R. Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks ofcancer in the United States today. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 1981; 66: 1191–308.
2Willett W. Diet, nutrition and avoidable cancer. Environ.Health Perspectives 1995; 103(Suppl. 8): 165–70.
3World Cancer Research Fund. Food, Nutrition and thePrevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR, 1997.
4Department of Health, COMA. Nutritional Aspects of theDevelopment of Cancer. Committee on Medical Aspects ofFood and Nutrition Policy, Report on Health and SocialSubjects No. 48. London: HMSO, 1998
5Riboli E. Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale ofthe European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Ann. Oncol. 1992; 3: 783–91.
6Kaaks R, Slimani N, Riboli E. Pilot phase studies on theaccuracy of dietary intake measurements in the EPIC project:overall evaluation of results. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26(Suppl. 8): S26–37.
7Bingham SA, Cummings JH. The use of urine nitrogen as anindependent validatory measure of protein intake: a study ofnitrogen balance in individuals consuming their normal diet. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1985; 42: 1276–89.
8Bingham SA, Cassidy A, Cole TJ, Key T, Welch A, Runswick S, Black AE, Thurnham D, Bates C, Khaw KT, Day NE. Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietaryassessment using the 24: h urine nitrogen technique andother biological markers. Br. J. Nutr. 1995; 73: 531–50.
9Bingham S, Gill C, Welch A, Cassidy A, Runswick S, Sneyd M, Thurnham D, Key TJA, Roe L, Khaw KT, Day NE. Validationof dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC. Int. J.Epidemiol. 1997; 26: S137–51.
10Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, Day K, Cassidy A, Khaw KT, Sneyd MJ, Key MJ, Roe L, Day NE. Comparison of dietaryassessment methods in nutritional epidemiology. Br. J. Nutr. 1994; 72: 619–42.
11Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson's TheComposition of Foods, Third Supplement on Cereals andCereal Products. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry andMAFF, 1988.
12Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson's TheComposition of Foods, Fourth Supplement on Milk Productsand Eggs. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry and MAFF, 1989.
13Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson's TheComposition of Foods, 5th edn. Cambridge: Royal Society ofChemistry and MAFF, 1991.
14Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson's TheComposition of Foods, Fifth Supplement on Vegetables, Herbsand Spices. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry and MAFF, 1991.
15Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson's FirstSupplement to The Composition of Foods, Fifth Edition onFruit and Nuts. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry and MAFF, 1992.
16Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson'sSecond Supplement to The Composition of Foods, FifthEdition on Vegetable Dishes. Cambridge: Royal Society ofChemistry and MAFF, 1992.
17Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson'sThird Supplement to The Composition of Foods, Fifth Editionon Fish and Fish Products. Cambridge: Royal Society ofChemistry and MAFF, 1993.
18Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson'.sFourth Supplement to The Composition of Foods, Fifth Editionon Miscellaneous Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society ofChemistry and MAFF, 1994.
19Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson's FifthSupplement to The Composition of Foods, Fifth Edition onMeat, Poultry and Game. Cambridge: Royal Society ofChemistry and MAFF, 1995.
20Royal Society of Chemistry. McCance and Widdowson's SixthSupplement to The Composition of Foods, Fifth Edition onMeat and Meat Products. Cambridge: Royal Society ofChemistry and MAFF, 1996.
21Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). FoodPortion Sizes, 2nd edn. London: HMSO, 1993.
22Nelson M, Atkinson M, Meyer J. Food Portion Sizes, APhotographic Atlas. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheriesand Food, 1997.
23Day NE, Oakes S, Luben R, Khaw KT, Bingham S, Welch A, Wareham N. EPIC in Norfolk: study design and characteristicsof the cohort. Br. J. Cancer 1999; 80(Suppl. 8): 95103.
24Schofield WN, Schofield C, James WPT. Basal metabolic rate- review and prediction. Suppl. Human Nutr.: Clin. Nutr. 1985; 39 C: 196.
25Vuilleumier JP, Keck E. Fluorometric assay of vitamin C inbiological materials using a centrifugal analyser withfluorescent attachment. J. Micronutrient Anal. 1989; 5: 2534.
26Key T, Oakes S, Davey G, Moore J, Edmond L, McLoone U, Thurnham DI. Whole blood stability at 4C. Cancer Epidemiol.Biomarkers Prev. 1996; 5: 811–4.
27Black AE, Prentice AM, Goldberg GR, Jebb SA, Bingham SA, Livingstone MBE, Coward WA. Measurements of energyexpenditure provide insights into the validity of dietarymeasurements of energy intake. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 1993; 93: 572–9.
28Finch S, Doyle W, Lowe C, Bates CJ, Prentice A, Smithers G, Clarke PC. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: People aged 65: years and over. London: HMSO, 1998.
29Gregory J, Foster K, Tyler H, Wiseman M. The Dietary andNutritional Survey of British Adults. London: OPCS, 1990.
30Ministry of Ariculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). HouseholdFood Consumption and Expenditure. Reports 19951998. London: HMSO.
31Bingham SA, McNeil NI, Cummings JH. The diet ofindividuals. Br. J. Nutr. 1981; 45: 2335.
32Bingham SA. Food consumption and nutrient intake. In: Margetts B, Nelson M, eds. Design Concepts in NutritionalEpidemiology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997; 147.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 378 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 691 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.