Skip to main content

Perceptions of the food shopping environment are associated with greater consumption of fruits and vegetables

  • Jonathan L Blitstein (a1), Jeremy Snider (a2) and W Douglas Evans (a2)

The present study examined whether characteristics such as quality, selection and convenience are associated with dietary intake of fruits and vegetables independent of perceived costs in an inner-city, low-income population.


Secondary analysis of baseline data from a social marketing intervention designed to change household dietary practices among parents of 3- to 7-year-old children.


A community sample drawn from six low-income, primarily minority neighbourhoods in Chicago, IL, USA.


From the parent study, 526 respondents completed the baseline survey and were eligible for inclusion. Of this number, 495 provided complete data on sociodemographic characteristics, fruit and vegetable consumption, perceptions of the shopping environment, perceived costs of fruits and vegetables, and food shopping habits.


Logistic regression analysis showed that more positive perceptions of the food shopping environment were associated with greater consumption of fruits and vegetables. There was an increase of approximately twofold in the likelihood of consuming three or more fruits and vegetables daily per level of satisfaction ascribed to the shopping environment. This association was independent of perceived cost, store type and sociodemographic characteristics.


Our data show that among a generally minority and low-income population, quality, selection and convenience are important determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption. Nutrition promotion campaigns that aim to alter the built environment by increasing access to fruits and vegetables should recognize that simply increasing availability may not yield beneficial change when characteristics of the shopping context are ignored.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Perceptions of the food shopping environment are associated with greater consumption of fruits and vegetables
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Perceptions of the food shopping environment are associated with greater consumption of fruits and vegetables
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Perceptions of the food shopping environment are associated with greater consumption of fruits and vegetables
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email
Hide All
1.US Department of Agriculture & US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010, 7th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
2.Drewnowski A (2004) Obesity and the food environment. Am J Prev Med 27, 154162.
3.Van Duyn MA & Pivonka E (2000) Overview of the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption for the dietetics professionals: selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 15111521.
4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) State-specific trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults – United States, 2000–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59, 11251131.
5.Cassady D, Jetter KM & Culp J (2007) Is price a barrier to eating more fruits and vegetables for low-income families? J Am Diet Assoc 107, 19091915.
6.Ard JD, Fitzpatrick S, Desmond RA et al. (2007) The impact of cost on the availability of fruits and vegetables in the homes of schoolchildren in Birmingham, Alabama. Am J Public Health 97, 367372.
7.Drewnowski A & Darmon N (2005) Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis. J Nutr 135, 900904.
8.Booth KM, Pinkston MM & Poston WSC (2005) Obesity and the built environment. J Am Diet Assoc 105, S110S117.
9.Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW et al. (2003) Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science 299, 853855.
10.JrBarrera M, Strycker LA, MacKinnon DP et al. (2008) Social-ecological resources as mediators of two-year diet and physical activity outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients. Health Psychol 27, S118S125.
11.Burdette HL & Whitaker RC (2004) Neighborhood playgrounds, fast food restaurants, and crime: relationships to overweight in low-income preschool children. Prev Med 57, 5763.
12.Veenstra G, Luginaah I, Wakefield S et al. (2005) Who you know, where you live: social capital, neighborhood and health. Soc Sci Med 60, 27992818.
13.Morland K, Wing S, Roux AD et al. (2002) Neighborhood characteristics associated with the location of food stores and food service places. Am J Prev Med 22, 2329.
14.Lopez R & Hynes HP (2006) Obesity, physical activity, and the urban environment: public health research needs. Environ Health 5, e25.
15.Latham J & Moffat T (2007) Determinants of variation in food cost and availability in two socioeconomically contrasting neighbourhoods of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Health Place 13, 273287.
16.Morland K & Filomena S (2007) Disparities in the availability of fruits and vegetables between racially segregated urban neighborhoods. Public Health Nutr 12, 14811489.
17.Powell LM, Slater S, Mirtcheva D et al. (2007) Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States. Prev Med 44, 189195.
18.Hersey J, Anliker J, Miller C et al. (2001) Food shopping practices are associated with dietary quality in low-income households. J Nutr Educ 33, Suppl. 1, S16S26.
19.Webber CB, Sobal J & Dollahite JS (2010) Shopping for fruits and vegetables. Food and retail qualities of importance to low-income households at the grocery store. Appetite 54, 297303.
20.Inagami S, Cohen DA, Finch BK et al. (2006) You are where you shop: grocery store locations, weight, and neighborhoods. Am J Prev Med 31, 1017.
21.Rose D & Richards R (2004) Food store access and household fruit and vegetable use among participants in the US food stamp program. Public Health Nutr 7, 10811088.
22.Dibsdall LA, Lambert N, Bobbin RF et al. (2003) Low-income consumers’ attitudes and behaviour towards access, availabilty and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. Public Health Nutr 6, 159168.
23.Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Hollis-Neely T et al. (2005) Fruit and vegetable intake in African Americans: income and store characteristics. Am J Prev Med 29, 19.
24.Cummins S, Smith DM, Taylor M et al. (2009) Variations in fresh fruit and vegetable quality by store type, urban–rural setting and neighbourhood deprivation in Scotland. Public Health Nutr 12, 20442050.
25.Evans WD, Necheles J, Longjohn M et al. (2007) The 5-4-3-2-1 Go! intervention: social marketing strategies for nutrition. J Nutr Educ Behav 39, S55S59.
26.Comrey HB & Lee AL (1992) A First Course in Factor Analysis. HIllsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27.Ball K, Crawford D & Mishra G (2006) Socio-economic inequities in women's fruit and vegetable intakes: a multilevel study of individual, social, and environmental mediators. Public Health Nutr 9, 623630.
28.Shohaimi S, Welch A, Bingham S et al. (2004) Residential area deprivation predicts fruit and vegetable consumption independently of individual educational level and occupational social class: a cross sectional population study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk). J Epidemiol Community Health 58, 686691.
29.Freedman DA & Bell BA (2009) Access to healthful foods among an urban food insecure population: perceptions versus reality. J Urban Health 86, 825837.
30.Sacks G, Swinburn B & Lawrence M (2009) Obesity policy action framework and analysis grids for a comprehensive policy approach to reducing obesity. Obes Rev 10, 7686.
31.Gregson J, Foerster SB, Orr R et al. (2001) System, environmental, and policy changes: using the social-ecological model as a framework for evaluating nutrition education and social marketing programs with low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ 33, Suppl. 1, S4S15.
32.Glanz K & Yaroch AL (2004) Strategies for increasing fruit and vegetable intake in grocery stores and communities: policy, pricing, and environmental change. Prev Med 39, Suppl. 2, S75S80.
33.Wasserman W, Tropp D, Lakins V et al. (2010) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) at Farmers Market: A How-to Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service.
34.Briggs S, Fisher A, Lott M et al. (2010) Real Food, Real Choice: Connecting SNAP Recipients with Farmers Markets. Portland, OR: Community Food Security Coaliation.
35.Cummins S, Curtis S, Diez-Roux AV et al. (2007) Understanding and representing place in health research: a relational approach. Soc Sci Med 65, 18251838.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 41
Total number of PDF views: 206 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 912 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.