Skip to main content Accessibility help

Socio-economic differences in takeaway food consumption among adults

  • Kyoko Miura (a1), Katrina Giskes (a1) and Gavin Turrell (a1)

To examine socio-economic differences in the frequency and types of takeaway foods consumed.


A cross-sectional postal survey.


Participants were asked about their usual consumption of overall takeaway food (<4 times/month or ≥4 times/month) and of twenty-two specific takeaway food items (<1 time/month or ≥1 time/month); these latter foods were grouped into ‘healthy’ and ‘less healthy’ choices. Socio-economic position was measured on the basis of educational level and equivalised household income, and differences in takeaway food consumption were assessed by calculating prevalence ratios using log binomial regression.


Adults aged 25–64 years from Brisbane, Australia, were randomly selected from the electoral roll (n 903; 63·7 % response rate).


Compared with their more educated counterparts, the least educated were more regular consumers of overall takeaway food and fruit or vegetable juice and less regular consumers of sushi. For the ‘less healthy’ items, the least educated more regularly consumed potato chips, savoury pies, fried chicken and non-diet soft drinks; however, the least educated were less likely to consume curry. Household income was not associated with overall takeaway consumption. The lowest-income group was a more regular consumer of fruit or vegetable juice compared with the highest-income group. Among the ‘less healthy’ items, the lowest-income group was a more regular consumer of fried fish, ice cream and milk shakes, whereas curry was consumed less regularly.


The frequency and types of takeaway foods consumed by socio-economically disadvantaged groups may contribute to inequalities in overweight or obesity and to chronic disease.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Socio-economic differences in takeaway food consumption among adults
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Socio-economic differences in takeaway food consumption among adults
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Socio-economic differences in takeaway food consumption among adults
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email
Hide All
1. Inglis, V, Ball, K & Crawford, D (2008) Socioeconomic variations in women's diets: what is the role of perceptions of the local food environment? J Epidemiol Community Health 62, 191197.
2. Miura, K, Giskes, K & Turrell, G (2009) Socioeconomic differences in takeaway food consumption and their contribution to inequalities in dietary intakes. J Epidemiol Community Health 63, 820826.
3. Mohr, P, Wilson, C, Dunn, K et al. (2007) Personal and lifestyle characteristics predictive of the consumption of fast foods in Australia. Public Health Nutr 10, 14561463.
4. Thornton, LE, Bentley, RJ & Kavanagh, AM (2010) Individual and area-level socioeconomic associations with fast food purchasing. J Epidemiol Commuty Health (Epublication ahead of print version).
5. Turrell, G & Giskes, K (2008) Socioeconomic disadvantage and the purchase of takeaway food: a multilevel analysis. Appetite 51, 6981.
6. Smith, KJ, McNaughton, SA, Gall, SL et al. (2009) Takeaway food consumption and its associations with diet quality and abdominal obesity: a cross-sectional study of young adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6, 29.
7. Fanning, J, Marsh, T & Stiegert, K (2010) Determinants of US fast food consumption 1994–1998. Br Food J 112, 520.
8. Pereira, MA, Kartashov, AI, Ebbeling, CB et al. (2005) Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet 365, 3642.
9. Schröder, H, Fïto, M & Covas, MI (2007) Association of fast food consumption with energy intake, diet quality, body mass index and the risk of obesity in a representative Mediterranean population. Br J Nutr 98, 12741280.
10. Paeratakul, S, Ferdinand, DP, Champagne, CM et al. (2003) Fast-food consumption among US adults and children: dietary and nutrient intake profile. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 13321338.
11. Beydoun, MA & Wang, Y (2008) How do socio-economic status, perceived economic barriers and nutritional benefits affect quality of dietary intake among US adults? Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 303313.
12. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008) Cafes, Restaurants and Catering Services, Australia 2006–07. Catalogue no. 8655.0. Canberra, Australia: ABS; available at$File/86550_2006-07.pdf
13. Australian Food News (2008) Companies Adapting to Changing Consumer Food Preferences. Victoria: AFN; available at
14. Willett, W (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
15. Boucher, B, Cotterchio, M, Kreiger, N et al. (2006) Validity and reliability of the Block98 food-frequency questionnaire in a sample of Canadian women. Public Health Nutr 9, 8493.
16. Smith, W, Mitchell, P, Reay, EM et al. (1998) Validity and reproducibility of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire in older people. Aust N Z J Public Health 22, 456463.
17. Stevens, J, Metcalf, PA, Dennis, BH et al. (1996) Reliability of a food frequency questionnaire by ethnicity, gender, age and education. Nutr Res 16, 735745.
18. Kipnis, V, Subar, AF, Midthune, D et al. (2003) Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. J Am Epidemiol 158, 1421.
19. Dillman, DA (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. BIS Shrapnel (2008) Proposal: Fast Food in Australia 2009. (accessed March 2011).
21. The Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services (1998) The Australian Guide to Healthy Eating: Background Information for Nutrition Educators. Canberra: Department of Health and Family Services.
22. Queensland Health (2007) A better choice healthy food and drink supply strategy for queensland health facilities (accessed July 2010).
23. New South Wales Health & New South Wales Department of Education and Training (2006) Fresh Tastes at School: NSW Healthy School Canteen Strategy Canteen Menu Planning Guide. NSW: NSW Department of Health and NSW DET; available at
24. Turrell, G, Hewitt, B, Patterson, C et al. (2003) Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important? Public Health Nutr 6, 191200.
25. Turrell, G & Kavanagh, AM (2006) Socio-economic pathways to diet: modelling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behaviour. Public Health Nutr 9, 375383.
26. Atkinson, AB, Rainwater, L & Smeeding, TM (1995) Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. Social Policy Studies no. 18. Paris: OECD.
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009) Income distribution and poverty: data, figures, methods and concepts. What are equivalence scales? (accessed July 2010).
28. Lantz, CA (1997) Application and evaluation of the kappa statistic in the design and interpretation of chiropractic clinical research. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 20, 521528.
29. Sim, J & Wright, CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85, 257268.
30. Landis, JR & Koch, GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159174.
31. Barros, A & Hirakata, V (2003) Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 3, 21.
32. Blizzard, L & Hosmer, DW (2007) The log multinomial regression model for nominal outcomes with more than two attributes. Biom J 49, 889902.
33. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010) CDATA online: 2006 Census data. (accessed September 2010).
34. Burns, C, Jackson, M, Gibbons, C et al. (2002) Foods prepared outside the home: association with selected nutrients and body mass index in adult Australians. Public Health Nutr 5, 441448.
35. Bowman, SA & Vinyard, BT (2004) Fast food consumption of U.S. adults: impact on energy and nutrient intakes and overweight status. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 163168.
36. Feinstein, AR & Cicchetti, DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43, 543549.
37. Dunford, E, Webster, J, Barzi, F et al. (2010) Nutrient content of products served by leading Australian fast food chains. Appetite 50, 484489.
38. Gibson, RS (2005) Principles of Nutritional Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Batty, GD & Gale, CR (2009) Impact of resurvey non-response on the associations between baseline risk factors and cardiovascular disease mortality: prospective cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 63, 952955.
40. Tolonen, H, Dobson, A, Kulathinal, S et al. (2005) Effect on trend estimates of the difference between survey respondents and non-respondents: results from 27 populations in the WHO MONICA Project. Eur J Epidemiol 20, 887898.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed