Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities

  • Hanna Konttinen (a1), Sirpa Sarlio-Lähteenkorva (a2), Karri Silventoinen (a1), Satu Männistö (a3) and Ari Haukkala (a1)...
Abstract
Objective

A low socio-economic status (SES) is related to less healthy dietary habits, but the reasons for this remain unclear. We examined whether the absolute or relative importance of various food choice motives contributed to SES disparities in vegetable/fruit and energy-dense food intake.

Design

We analysed cross-sectional data from the FINRISK Study 2007 by means of structural equation modelling and used a shortened version of the Food Choice Questionnaire to assess the absolute importance of health, pleasure, convenience, price, familiarity and ethicality motives. We calculated the relative importance of each motive by dividing the participant's rating of it by his/her mean score on all motives. Dietary intake was measured with an FFQ.

Setting

A population-based survey in Finland.

Subjects

Men (n 1691) and women (n 2059) aged 25–64 years.

Results

Higher education and income were related to a greater vegetable/fruit intake (β = 0·12, P < 0·001), while education was associated negatively with the consumption of energy-dense foods (β = −0·09, P < 0·001). Socio-economically disadvantaged individuals considered price and/or familiarity more important in their food choices in both absolute and relative terms. A higher income was related to a greater relative importance of health considerations. Relative motives were more strongly associated with vegetable/fruit and energy-dense food consumption than absolute motives and the relative importance of price, familiarity and health partly mediated the effects of the SES indicators on the consumption of these food items.

Conclusions

Individual priorities in food choice motives, rather than the absolute importance of single motives, play a role in producing SES disparities in diet.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email hanna.konttinen@helsinki.fi
References
Hide All
1.Giskes, K, Avendano, M, Brug, Jet al. (2010) A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obes Rev 11, 413429.
2.Darmon, N & Drewnowski, A (2008) Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr 87, 11071117.
3.James, WP, Nelson, M, Ralph, Aet al. (1997) Socioeconomic determinants of health. The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. BMJ 314, 15451549.
4.Galobardes, B, Morabia, A & Bernstein, MS (2001) Diet and socioeconomic position: does the use of different indicators matter? Int J Epidemiol 30, 334340.
5.Miura, K, Giskes, K & Turrell, G (2012) Socio-economic differences in takeaway food consumption among adults. Public Health Nutr 15, 218226.
6.Thornton, LE, Bentley, RJ & Kavanagh, AM (2011) Individual and area-level socioeconomic associations with fast food purchasing. J Epidemiol Community Health 65, 873880.
7.Pereira, MA, Kartashov, AI, Ebbeling, CBet al. (2005) Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet 365, 3642.
8.Steptoe, A & Wardle, J (1999) Motivational factors as mediators of socioeconomic variations in dietary intake patterns. Psychol Health 14, 391402.
9.Hupkens, CLH, Knibbe, RA & Drop, MJ (2000) Social class differences in food consumption. The explanatory value of permissiveness and health and cost considerations. Eur J Public Health 10, 108113.
10.Ball, K, Crawford, D & Mishra, G (2006) Socio-economic inequalities in women's fruit and vegetable intakes: a multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators. Public Health Nutr 9, 623630.
11.Steptoe, A, Pollard, TM & Wardle, J (1995) Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite 25, 267284.
12.Glanz, K, Basil, M, Maibach, Eet al. (1998) Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 11181126.
13.Connors, M, Bisogni, CA, Sobal, Jet al. (2001) Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite 36, 189200.
14.Lennernas, M, Fjellstrom, C, Becker, Wet al. (1997) Influences on food choice perceived to be important by nationally-representative samples of adults in the European Union. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, Suppl. 2, S8S15.
15.Bowman, SA (2006) A comparison of the socioeconomic characteristics, dietary practices, and health status of women food shoppers with different food price attitudes. Nutr Res 26, 318324.
16.Drewnowski, A (2010) The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 11811188.
17.Sobal, J, Bisogni, CA, Devine, CMet al. (2006) A conceptual model of the food choice process over the life course. In The Psychology of Food Choice, pp. 118 [R Shepherd and M Raats, editors]. Wallingford: CABI.
18.Sobal, J & Bisogni, CA (2009) Constructing food choice decisions. Ann Behav Med 38, Suppl. 1, S37S46.
19.Lappalainen, R, Saba, A, Holm, Let al. (1997) Difficulties in trying to eat healthier: descriptive analysis of perceived barriers for healthy eating. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, Suppl. 2, S36S40.
20.Beydoun, MA & Wang, Y (2008) How do socio-economic status, perceived economic barriers and nutritional benefits affect quality of dietary intake among US adults? Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 303313.
21.Schwartz, SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 165 [M Zanna, editor]. New York: Academic Press.
22.Vartiainen, E, Laatikainen, T, Peltonen, Met al. (2010) Thirty-five-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors in Finland. Int J Epidemiol 39, 504518.
23.Eertmans, A, Victoir, A, Notelaers, Get al. (2006) The Food Choice Questionnaire: factorial invariant over western urban populations? Food Qual Prefer 17, 344352.
24.Fotopoulos, C, Krystallis, A, Vassallo, Met al. (2009) Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) revisited. Suggestions for the development of an enhanced general food motivation model. Appetite 52, 199208.
25.Hu, L-T & Bentler, PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6, 155.
26.Cattell, RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res 1, 245276.
27.Verkasalo, M, Tuomivaara, P & Lindeman, M (1996) 15-year-old pupils’ and their teachers’ values, and their beliefs about the values of an ideal pupil. Educ Psychol 16, 3547.
28.Schwartz, SH & Rubel, T (2005) Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies. J Pers Soc Psychol 89, 10101028.
29.Männistö, S, Virtanen, M, Mikkonen, Tet al. (1996) Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in a case–control study on breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 49, 401409.
30.Paalanen, L, Männistö, S, Virtanen, MJet al. (2006) Validity of a food frequency questionnaire varied by age and body mass index. J Clin Epidemiol 59, 9941001.
31.Reinivuo, H, Hirvonen, T, Ovaskainen, MLet al. (2010) Dietary survey methodology of FINDIET 2007 with a risk assessment perspective. Public Health Nutr 13, 915919.
32.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1982) The OECD List of Social Indicators. Paris: OECD Social Indicator Development Programme.
33.Craig, CL, Marshall, AL, Sjostrom, Met al. (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35, 13811395.
34.Muthen, LK & Muthen, BO (1998–2009) Mplus User's Guide, 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
35.Westenhoefer, J (2005) Age and gender dependent profile of food choice. Forum Nutr 57, 4451.
36.Cheung, GW & Rensvold, RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 9, 233255.
37.Giskes, K, Turrell, G, Patterson, Cet al. (2002) Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutr 5, 663669.
38.Dibsdall, LA, Lambert, N, Bobbin, RFet al. (2003) Low-income consumers’ attitudes and behaviour towards access, availability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. Public Health Nutr 6, 159168.
39.Inglis, V, Ball, K & Crawford, D (2005) Why do women of low socioeconomic status have poorer dietary behaviours than women of higher socioeconomic status? A qualitative exploration. Appetite 45, 334343.
40.Waterlander, WE, de Mul, A, Schuit, AJet al. (2010) Perceptions on the use of pricing strategies to stimulate healthy eating among residents of deprived neighbourhoods: a focus group study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7, 44.
41.Barker, M, Lawrence, WT, Skinner, TCet al. (2008) Constraints on food choices of women in the UK with lower educational attainment. Public Health Nutr 11, 12291237.
42.Beaulac, J, Kristjansson, E & Cummins, S (2009) A systematic review of food deserts, 1966–2007. Prev Chronic Dis 6, A105.
43.Macintyre, S (2007) Deprivation amplification revisited; or, is it always true that poorer places have poorer access to resources for healthy diets and physical activity? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4, 32.
44.Pollard, TM, Steptoe, A & Wardle, J (1998) Motives underlying healthy eating: using the Food Choice Questionnaire to explain variation in dietary intake. J Biosoc Sci 30, 165179.
45.Grunert, KG, Baadsggaard, A, Larsen, HHet al. (1996) Market Orientation in Food and Agriculture. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46.Scheibehenne, B, Miesler, L & Todd, PM (2007) Fast and frugal food choices: uncovering individual decision heuristics. Appetite 49, 578589.
47.Maurer, J, Taren, DL, Teixeira, PJet al. (2006) The psychosocial and behavioral characteristics related to energy misreporting. Nutr Rev 64, 5366.
48.Hirvonen, T, Männistö, S, Roos, Eet al. (1997) Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, 297301.
49.Harald, K, Salomaa, V, Jousilahti, Pet al. (2007) Non-participation and mortality in different socioeconomic groups: the FINRISK population surveys in 1972–92. J Epidemiol Community Health 61, 449454.
50.Blakely, T, Ni Mhurchu, C, Jiang, Yet al. (2011) Do effects of price discounts and nutrition education on food purchases vary by ethnicity, income and education? Results from a randomised, controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 65, 902908.
51.Ni Mhurchu, C (2010) Food costs and healthful diets: the need for solution-oriented research and policies. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 10071008.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed