Skip to main content
×
Home

Who is missing the message? Targeting strategies to increase food label use among US adults

  • Xiaoli Chen (a1), Lisa Jahns (a2), Joel Gittelsohn (a1) and Youfa Wang (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To evaluate the associations between sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics and food label (FL) use in US adults.

Design

Data from the 1994–1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey were used. High socio-economic status (SES) was defined as >high school education and poverty–income ratio (PIR) >350 %, low SES as Setting

Metropolitan statistical area-central city, -suburban, and rural areas in the USA.

Subjects

US adults (n 2797; 1460 men, 1337 women) aged 20–64 years.

Results

Approximately 80 % of Americans reported using FL, including checking the nutrition panel, list of ingredients, short phrases, serving size, or health benefits. Only 26 % used all FL information. Compared with white women of higher SES, white men, black men and women with lower SES were 77–90 % less likely to use FL. Rural residents were 40 % less likely (OR = 0·60; 95 % CI 0·42, 0·86). Participants with good nutrition knowledge, perceptions and beliefs were twice as likely to check FL for nutrient content of foods (OR = 2·28; 95 % CI 1·53–3·40). Those who were unaware of diet–disease relationships were less likely to use FL (OR = 0·53; 95 % CI 0·32–0·85). Among overweight/obese Americans (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), those who perceived their weight ‘about right’ were 51 % less likely to use FL than those perceiving themselves as overweight.

Conclusions

Men, especially black men, women of low SES, rural residents and overweight Americans with inaccurate self-perception of body weight are less likely to use FL and should be targeted for increased intervention.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Who is missing the message? Targeting strategies to increase food label use among US adults
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Who is missing the message? Targeting strategies to increase food label use among US adults
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Who is missing the message? Targeting strategies to increase food label use among US adults
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email ywang@jhsph.edu
References
Hide All
1. Variyam JN (2008) Do nutrition labels improve dietary outcomes? Health Econ 17, 695708.
2. Kurtzweil P (1993) New Food Label: Good Reading for Good Eating. FDA Consumer 27. http://www.fda.gov/fda/special/foodlabel/goodread.html (accessed November 2010).
3. Lin CT, Lee JY & Yen ST (2004) Do dietary intakes affect search for nutrient information on food labels? Soc Sci Med 59, 19551967.
4. Zarkin GA, Dean N, Mauskopf JA et al. (1993) Potential health benefits of nutrition label changes. Am J Public Health 83, 717724.
5. Satia JA, Galanko JA & Neuhouser ML (2005) Food nutrition label use is associated with demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors and dietary intake among African Americans in North Carolina. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 392402.
6. Campos S, Doxey J & Hammond D (2011) Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 14, 14961506.
7. Kreuter MW, Brennan LK, Scharff DP et al. (1997) Do nutrition label readers eat healthier diets? Behavioral correlates of adults’ use of food labels. Am J Prev Med 13, 277283.
8. Neuhouser ML, Kristal AR & Patterson RE (1999) Use of food nutrition labels is associated with lower fat intake. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 4553.
9. Post RE, Mainous AG III, Diaz VA et al. (2010) Use of the nutrition facts label in chronic disease management: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 628632.
10. Ollberding NJ, Wolf RL & Contento I (2010) Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 12331237.
11. Perez-Escamilla R & Haldeman L (2002) Food label use modifies association of income with dietary quality. J Nutr 132, 768772.
12. Blitstein JL & Evans WD (2006) Use of nutrition facts panels among adults who make household food purchasing decisions. J Nutr Educ Behav 38, 360364.
13. Tippett KS & Cypel YS (editors) (1997) Design and Operation: The Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey, 1994–96. NFS Report no. 96–1. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
14. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL et al. (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303, 235241.
15. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no 894. Geneva: WHO.
16. Curran MA (2002) Nutrition labelling: perspectives of a bi-national agency for Australia and New Zealand. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 11, issue 2, S72S76.
17. Mhurchu CN & Gorton D (2007) Nutrition labels and claims in New Zealand and Australia: a review of use and understanding. Aust N Z J Public Health 31, 105112.
18. Cowburn G & Stockley L (2005) Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 8, 2128.
19. Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 31, 143164.
20. Guthrie JF, Fox JJ, Cleveland LE et al. (1995) Who uses nutrition labeling, and what effects does label use have on diet quality? J Nutr Educ 27, 163172.
21. Grunert KG, Wills JM & Fernandez-Celemin L (2010) Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK. Appetite 55, 177189.
22. Lewis JE, Arheart KL, LeBlanc WG et al. (2009) Food label use and awareness of nutritional information and recommendations among persons with chronic disease. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 13511357.
23. Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ & Najjar M (2001) Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc 101, 2834.
24. Venn AJ, Thomson RJ, Schmidt MD et al. (2007) Overweight and obesity from childhood to adulthood: a follow-up of participants in the 1985 Australian Schools Health and Fitness Survey. Med J Aust 186, 458460.
25. Freedman DM, Ron E, Ballard-Barbash R et al. (2006) Body mass index and all-cause mortality in a nationwide US cohort. Int J Obes (Lond) 30, 822829.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 88 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 205 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.