Skip to main content Accessibility help

Multi-stakeholder initiatives and the divergent construction and implementation of sustainable agriculture in the USA

  • Jason Konefal (a1), Maki Hatanaka (a1) and Douglas H. Constance (a1)


Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have emerged as a leading institutional approach for advancing sustainability globally. This paper examines three prominent MSIs that have developed sustainability metrics and a standard for US agriculture: Field to Market, the Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops and the National Sustainable Agricultural Standard Initiative. Using data from interviews and content analysis of initiative reports, two sets of analyses are presented. First, building on Paul Thompson's tri-partite theorization of sustainability, how each initiative is conceptualizing agricultural sustainability is analyzed. We find that two contrasting visions of sustainable agriculture for the USA have emerged from the three MSIs. One vision is a resource sufficiency approach focused on eco-efficiencies and the other vision is a functional integrity approach that emphasizes the maintenance of resilient agricultural and ecological systems. Second, we examine the governance practices of the MSIs to explain why such divergent conceptualizations of sustainability have been mapped out. We find that far from being a neutral forum, the internal dynamics of MSIs often reflect and reproduce existing power relationships among stakeholders. In concluding, we suggest that incremental improvements in sustainability can be achieved using MSIs, but more transformative changes may require other forms of governance.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Douglas H. Constance, E-mail:


Hide All
Allen, P and Sachs, C (1992) The poverty of sustainability: analysis of current positions. Agriculture and Human Values 9, 2935.
Allen, P and Sachs, C (1993) Sustainable agriculture in the United States: engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation. In Allen, P (ed.). Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 139168.
Bäckstrand, K (2006) Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability, and effectiveness. European Environment 16, 290306.
Bain, C, Ransom, E and Higgins, V (2013) Private agri-food standards: contestation, hybridity, and the politics of standards. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20, 110.
Bartley, T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology 113, 297351.
Beisheim, M and Dingwerth, K (2008) Procedural legitimacy and private transnational governance: are the good ones doing better. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series 14. Berlin, Germany: DFG Research Center (SFB) 700, Freie Universität Berlin.
Bostrom, M (2012) A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy 8, 314.
Brown, LG and Keyes, M (2007) A review of the draft standard for trial use. In Proceedings of the Establishing a National Sustainable Agriculture Standard Opening Stakeholder Dialogue, Emeryville, CA, October 29–30. Available at (accessed 20 April 2009).
Buller, H and Roe, M (2014) Modifying and commodifying farm animal welfare: the economisation of layer chickens. Journal of Rural Studies 33, 141149.
Busch, L (2011) Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cheyns, E (2011) Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture: limits of the ‘inclusiveness’ paradigm. In Ponte, S, Gibbon, P and Vestergaard, J (eds). Governing Through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 210235.
Cheyns, E and Riisgaard, L (2014) Introduction to the symposium. Agriculture and Human Values 31, 409423.
Clay, J (2011) Freeze the footprint of food. Nature 475, 287289.
Constance, DH (2010) Sustainable agriculture in the United States: a critical examination of a contested process. Sustainability 2, 4872.
Daly, HE (1996) Beyond Growth: the Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press.
Dobson, A (1996) Environmental sustainabilities: an analysis and a typology. Environmental Politics 5, 401428.
Dowie, M (1997) Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Field to Market (2012) Environmental and Socioeconomic Indicators for Measuring Outcomes of On-Farm Agricultural Production in the United States: Second Report. Available at (accessed 18 September 2013).
Field to Market (2013) Fieldprint calculator. Available at (accessed 18 September 2013).
Foresight (2011) The Future of Food and Farming: Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability. London: The Government Office for Science.
Freidberg, S (2013) Calculating sustainability in supply chain capitalism. Economy and Society 42, 571596.
Fridell, M, Hudson, I and Hudson, M (2008) With friends like these: the corporate response to fair trade coffee. Review of International Political Economy 40, 834.
Garnett, T, Appleby, MC, Balmford, A, Bateman, IJ, Benton, TG, Bloomer, P, Burlingame, B, Dawkins, M, Dolan, L, Fraser, D, Herrero, M, Hoffmann, I, Smith, P, Thornton, PK, Toulmin, C, Vermeulen, SJ and Godfray, HCJ (2013) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 3334.
Guthman, J (2004) Agrarian Dreams: the Paradox of Organic Farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hatanaka, M (2014) McSustainability and McJustice: certification, alternative food and agriculture, and social change. Sustainability 6, 80928112.
Hatanaka, M and Konefal, J (2013) Legitimacy and standard development in a multi-stakeholder initiative: a case study of the Leonardo Academy's sustainable agriculture standard initiative. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20, 155 173.
Hatanaka, M, Konefal, J and Constance, DH (2012) A tripartite standards regime analysis of the contested development of a sustainable agriculture standard. Agriculture and Human Values 29, 6578.
Hutchins, MJ and Sutherland, JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 16881698.
IAASTD (International Assessment of Agriculture Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) (2009) Agriculture at a Crossroads: Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Jaffee, D (2014) Brewing Justice: Fair Trade Coffee, Sustainability and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jaffee, D and Howard, PH (2010) Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values 27, 387399.
King, BG and Pearce, NA (2010) The contentiousness of markets: politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Review of Sociology 36, 249267.
Konefal, J (2013) Environmental movements, market-based approaches, and neoliberalization: a case study of the sustainable seafood movement. Organization & Environment 26, 336352.
Konefal, J, Hatanaka, M and Constance, DH (2014) Patchworks of sustainable agriculture standards and metrics in the United States. In Constance, DH, Renard, MC and Rivera-Ferre, MG (eds). Alternative Agrifood Movements: Patterns of Convergence and Divergence, Vol. 21, Research in Rural Sociology and Development. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 257280.
Leonardo Academy (2008) National Sustainable Agriculture Standard standards committee meeting notes. Available at (accessed 9 March 2011).
Leonardo Academy (2013) Draft: National Sustainable Agriculture Standard LEO-4000. Madison: Leonardo Academy.
Loconto, A (2010) Sustainably performed: reconciling global value chain governance and performativity. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 25, 193-22t5.
Loconto, A and Fouilleux, E (2014) Politics of private regulation: ISEAL and the shaping of transnational sustainability governance. Regulation & Governance 8, 166185.
Maciel, CT and Bock, BB (2013) Modern politics in animal welfare: the changing character of governance of animal welfare and the role of private standards. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20, 219235.
Morley, A, McEntee, J and Marsden, T (2014) Food futures: framing the crisis. In Marsden, T and Morley, A (eds). Sustainable Food Systems: Building a New Paradigm. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 3061.
National Research Council (2010) Toward Sustainable Agriculture Systems in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
Neumayer, E (2003). Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ponte, S (2014) Roundtabling sustainability: lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum 54, 261271.
SISC (Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops) (2014a) Working Metrics 1.0. Available at (accessed 8 October 2014).
SISC (Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops) (2014b) Metrics in Development. Available at (accessed 8 October 2014).
SISC (Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops) (2015) Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops. Available at (accessed 1 September 2015).
Solow, RM (1974) The economics of resources or the resources of economics. The American Economic Review 64, 114.
Tamm Hallstrom, K and Bostrom, M (2010) Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization. Northhampton: Edward Elgar.
Thompson, PB (2010) The Agrarian Vision: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Timmermans, S and Epstein, S (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology 36, 6989.
Unruh, G and Ettenson, G (2010) Winning in the green frenzy. Harvard Business Review (November), 110116.
Williams, R, Allan, JT, Moore, R, Peterson, B, Thorne, J, Johnson, DB, Barach, J, McCauley, K, Norman, BM, Guenther, R (2010) Resignation Letter, Letter to Mr. Arny. Available at (accessed 12 March 2012).


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Multi-stakeholder initiatives and the divergent construction and implementation of sustainable agriculture in the USA

  • Jason Konefal (a1), Maki Hatanaka (a1) and Douglas H. Constance (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.