Skip to main content
×
Home

Reconciling productivity with protection of the environment: Is temperate agroforestry the answer?

  • Jo Smith (a1), Bruce D. Pearce (a1) and Martin S. Wolfe (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Meeting the needs for a growing world population calls for multifunctional land use, which can meet the multiple demands of food and fuel production, environmental and biodiversity protection, and has the capacity for adaptation or resilience to climate change. Agroforestry, a land-use system that integrates trees and shrubs with crops and/or livestock production, has been identified by the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) as a ‘win–win’ approach that balances the production of commodities (food, feed, fuel, fiber, etc.) with non-commodity outputs such as environmental protection and cultural and landscape amenities. Evidence is now coming to light that supports the promotion of agroforestry in temperate developed countries as a sustainable alternative to the highly industrialized agricultural model with its associated negative environmental externalities. This paper reviews this evidence within the ‘ecosystem services’ framework to evaluate agroforestry as part of a multifunctional working landscape in temperate regions. Establishing trees on agricultural land can help to mitigate many of the negative impacts of agriculture, for example by regulating soil, water and air quality, supporting biodiversity, reducing inputs by natural regulation of pests and more efficient nutrient cycling, and by modifying local and global climates. The challenge now lies in promoting the adoption of agroforestry as a mainstream land use through research, dissemination of information and policy changes.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: jo.s@organicresearchcentre.com
References
Hide All
1FAO. 2009. How to feed the world in 2050. Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf (accessed January 16, 2012).
2Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington.
3Cannell M.G.R., Van Noordwijk M., and Ong C.K. 1996. The central agroforestry hypothesis: The trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire. Agroforestry Systems 34:2731.
4Jose S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforestry Systems 76:110.
5IAASTD. 2008. Executive summary of the synthesis report. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. Available at Web site http://www.agassessment.org/docs/IAASTD_EXEC_SUMMARY_JAN_2008.pdf (accessed January 16, 2012).
6Bene J.G., Beall H.W., and Côté A. 1977. Trees, Food and People – Land Management in the Tropics. IDRC, Ottawa.
7Young A. 1997. Agroforestry for Soil Management. 2nd ed.CAB International, Wallingford.
8Lundgren B. 1982. Introduction (Editorial). Agroforestry Systems 1:36.
9Leakey R.R.B. 1996. Definition of agroforestry revisited. Agroforestry Today (ICRAF) 8(1):57.
10Nair P.K.R. 1985. Classification of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 3:97128.
11Sinclair F.L., Eason W.R., and Hooker J. 2000. Understanding and management of interactions. In Hislop A.M. and Claridge J. (eds). Bulletin 122. Agroforestry in the UK. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
12Jose S., Gillespie A.R., and Pallardy S.G. 2004. Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agro-forestry Systems 61:237255.
13Dixon R.K., Winjum J.K., Andrasko K.J., Lee J.J., and Schroeder P. 1994. Integrated land-use systems: Assessment of promising agroforest and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration. Climate Change 27:7192.
14Mead D.J. 1995. The role of agroforestry in industrialised nations: The southern hemisphere perspective with special emphasis on Australia and New Zealand. Agroforestry Systems 31:143156.
15Young A. 1997. Agroforestry, soil management a and sustainability. In Young A. (ed.). Agroforestry for Soil Management. CAB International, Wallingford. p. 122.
16Tamang B., Andreu M.G., and Rockwood D.L. 2010. Microclimate patterns on the leeside of single-row tree windbreaks during different weather conditions in Florida farms: Implications for improved crop production. Agroforestry Systems 79(1):111122.
17Williams P.A., Gordon A.M., Garrett H.E., and Buck L. 1997. Agroforestry inNorth Americaand its role in farming systems. In Gordon A.M. and Newman S.M. (eds). Temperate Agroforestry Systems. CAB International, Wallingford. p. 984.
18Bharati L., Lee K.H., Isenhart T.M., and Schultz R.C. 2002. Soil–water infiltration under crops, pasture and established riparian buffer in Midwest USA. Agroforestry Systems 56:249257.
19Seobi T., Udawatta R.P., Anderson S.H., and Gantzer C.J. 2005. Influence of grass and agroforestry buffer strips on soil hydraulic properties for an albaqualf. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:893901.
20Gea-Izquierdo G., Montero G., and Canellas I. 2009. Changes in limiting resources determine spatio-temporal variability in tree–grass interactions. Agroforestry Systems 76:375387.
21Mead D.J. and Willey R.W. 1980. The concept of a ‘land equivalent ratio’ and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16:217228.
22Dupraz C. and Newman S.M. 1997. Temperate Agro-forestry: The European Way. In Gordon A.M. and Newman S.M. (eds). Temperate Agroforestry Systems. CAB International, Wallingford. p. 181236.
23Benjamin T.J., Hoover W.L., Seifert J.R., and Gillespie A.R. 2000. Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA 4. The economic return of ecological knowledge. Agroforestry Systems 48:7993.
24Brownlow M.J.C. 1994. The Characteristics and Viability of Land-Use Systems Which Integrate Pig or Poultry Production with Forestry in the UK. Department of Agriculture. University of Reading, Reading, MA.
25Brownlow M.J.C., Dorward P.T., and Carruthers S.P. 2005. Integrating natural woodland with pig production in the United Kingdom: An investigation of potential performance and interactions. Agroforestry Systems 64:251263.
26Rigueiro-Rodríguez A., Fernández-Núnez E., Gonzalez-Hernandez M.P., McAdam J., and Mosquera-Losada M.R. 2008. Agroforestry Systems in Europe: Productive, Ecological and Social Perspectives. In Rigueiro-Rodríguez A. et al. (eds). Agroforestry in Europe: Current Status and Future Prospects. Springer, Belfast. p. 4365.
27Yates C., Dorward P., Hemery G., and Cook P. 2007. The economic viability and potential of a novel poultry agroforestry system. Agroforestry Systems 69:1328.
28Benavides R., Douglas G.B., and Osoro K. 2009. Silvopastoralism in New Zealand: Review of effects of evergreen and deciduous trees on pasture dynamics. Agroforestry Systems 76:327350.
29Tyndall J. and Colletti J. 2007. Mitigating swine odour with strategically designed shelterbelt systems: A review. Agroforestry Systems 69:4565.
30Jones C., Lawton J.H., and Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373386.
31Jones C., Lawton J.H., and Shachak M. 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78(7):19461957.
32Bird P.R. 1998. Tree windbreaks and shelter benefits to pasture in temperate grazing systems. Agroforestry Systems 41:3554.
33Brandle J.R., Hodges L., and Zhou X.H. 2004. Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agroforestry Systems 61:6578.
34Moreno G., Obrador J.J., Garcia E., Cubera E., Montero M.J., Pulido F., and Dupraz C. 2007. Driving competitive and facilitative interactions in oak dehesas through management practices. Agroforestry Systems 70:2540.
35Wang Q. and Shogren J.F. 1992. Characteristics of the crop–Pawlonia system in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 39:145152.
36Norton R.L. 1988. Windbreaks: Benefits to orchards and vineyard crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22:205213.
37Chirko C.P., Gold M.A., Nguyen P.V., and Jiang J.P. 1996. Influence of direction and distance from trees on wheat yield and photosynthetic photon flux density (Qp) in a Paulownia and wheat intercropping system. Forest Ecology and Management 83:171180.
38Reynolds P.E., Simpson J.A., Thevathasan N.V., and Gordon A.M. 2007. Effects of tree competition on corn and soybean photosynthesis, growth, and yield in a temperate tree-based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering 29:362371.
39Joffre R. and Rambal S. 1993. How tree cover influences the water balance of Mediterranean rangelands. Ecology 74(2):570582.
40Jose S. and Gillespie A.R. 1998. Allelopathy in black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) alley cropping. II. Effects of juglone on hydroponically grown corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) growth and physiology. Plant and Soil 203:199205.
41Mitlohner F.M., Morrow J.L., Dailey J.W., Wilson S.C., Galyean M.L., Miller M.F., and McGlone J.J. 2001. Shade and water misting effects on behaviour, physiology, performance and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79:23272335.
42Karki U. and Goodman M.S. 2009. Cattle distribution and behaviour in southern-pine silvopasture versus open-pasture. Agroforestry Systems 78(2):159168.
43Dawkins M.S., Cook P.A., Whittingham M.J., Mansell K.A., and Harper A.E. 2003. What makes free-range broiler chickens range? In situ measurement of habitat preferences. Animal Behaviour 66:151160.
44Stolba A. and Woodgush D.G.M. 1989. The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production 48(2):419425.
45Waller P.J., Bernes G., Thamsborg S.M., Sukura A., Richter S.H., Ingebrigsten K., and Höglund J. 2001. Plants as de-worming agents of livestock in the Nordic countries: Historical perspective, popular beliefs and prospects for the future. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 42:3144.
46Schroeder P. 1994. Carbon storage benefits of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 27:8997.
47Albrecht A. and Kandji S.T. 2003. Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 99(1–3):1527.
48Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:16231627.
49Montagnini F. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 61:281295.
50Peichl M., Thevathasan N.V., Gordon A.M., Huss J., and Abohassan R.A. 2006. Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada Agroforestry Systems. 66:243257.
51Schoeneberger M.M. 2009. Agroforestry: Working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforestry Systems 75:2737.
52Dixon R.K. 1995. Agroforestry systems: Sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agroforestry Systems 31:99116.
53Nair P.K.R., Kumar B.M., and Nair V.D. 2009. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172(1):1023.
54Volk T.A., Abrahamson L.P., Nowak C.A., Smart L.B., Tharakan P.J., and White E.H. 2006. The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation. Biomass and Bioenergy 30:715727.
55Hall D.O. and House J.I. 1994. Trees and biomass energy: Carbon storage and/or fossil fuel substitution. Biomass and Bioenergy 6(1/2):1130.
56Rowe R.L., Street N.R., and Taylor G. 2009. Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployments of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(1):271290.
57Mutuo P., Cadisch G., Albrecht A., Palm C.A., and Verchot L. 2005. Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 71:4354.
58Braban C., Famulari D., Twigg M., Robertson A., Quinn A., Theobold M., Nemitz E., Dragosits U., Bealey W., Dore T., and Sutton M. 2009. Potential for ammonia abatement using agroforestry. In New Futures for Farm Woodlands. Farm Woodland Forum Annual Meeting 2009: National Forest Youth Hostel, Derbyshire. p. 23.
59Thevathasan N.V. and Gordon A.M. 2004. Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the North temperate region: Experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems 61:257268.
60Dougherty M.C., Thevathasan N.V., Gordon A.M., Lee H., and Kort J. 2009. Nitrate and Escherichia coli NAR analysis in tile drain effluent from a mixed tree intercrop and monocrop system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 131:7784.
61Udawatta R.P., Krstansky J.J., Henderson G.S., and Garrett H.E. 2002. Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: A paired watershed comparison. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:12141225.
62Lee K.H., Isenhart T.M., and Schultz R.C. 2003. Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58:18.
63Anderson S.H., Udawatta R.P., Seobi T., and Garrett H.E. 2009. Soil water content and infiltration in agroforestry buffer strips. Agroforestry Systems 75:516.
64Udawatta R.P., Garrett H.E., and Kallenbach R.L. 2010. Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on water quality in grazed pastures. Agroforestry Systems 79(1):8187.
65Dosskey M.G. 2001. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land. Environmental Management 28(5):577598.
66Borin M., Passoni M., Thiene M., and Tempesta T. 2009. Multiple benefits of buffer strips in farming areas. European Journal of Agronomy.
67Chu B., Goyne K.W., Anderson S.H., Lin C.-H., and Udawatta R.P. 2010. Veterinary antibiotic sorption to agroforestry buffer, grass buffer and cropland soils. Agroforestry Systems 79(1):6780.
68Bari M.A. and Schofield N.J. 1991. Effects of agroforestry-pasture associations on groundwater level and salinity. Agroforestry Systems 16:1331.
69Aronsson P. and Perttu K. 2001. Willow vegetation filters for wastewater treatment and soil remediation combined with biomass production. Forest Chronicle 77:293299.
70Rockwood D.L., Naidu C.V., Carter D.R., Rahmani M., Spriggs T.A., Lin C., Alker G.R., Isebrands J.G., and Segrest S.A. 2004. Short-rotation woody crops and phytoremediation: Opportunities for agroforestry? Agroforestry Systems 61:5163.
71Mirck J., Isebrands J.G., Verwijst T., and Ledin S. 2005. Development of short-rotation willow coppice systems for environmental purposes in Sweden. Biomass and Bioenergy 28(2):219228.
72Wilkinson A.G. 1999. Poplars and willows for soil erosion control in New Zealand. Biomass and Bioenergy 16:263274.
73Blaschke P.M., Trustrum N.A., and DeRose R.C. 1992. Ecosystem processes and sustainable land use in New Zealand steeplands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 41:153178.
74Stamps W.T. and Linit M.J. 1998. Plant diversity and arthropod communities: Implications for temperate agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 39:7389.
75Vandermeer J. 1989. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
76Schmidt M. and Tscharntke T. 2005. The role of perennial habitats for Central European farmland spiders. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105(1–2):235242.
77Dix M.E., Johnson R.J., Harrell M.O., Case R.M., Wright R.J., Hodges L., Brandle J.R., Schoeneberger M.M., Sunderman N.J., Fitzmaurice R.L., Young L.J., and Hubbard K.G. 1995. Influences of trees on abundance of natural enemies of insect pests: A review. Agroforestry Systems 29:303311.
78Best L.B., Whitmore R.C., and Booth G.M. 1990. Use of cornfields by birds during the breeding season: The importance of edge habitat. American Midland Naturalist 123:8499.
79Peacock L. and Herrick S. 2000. Responses of the willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima to genetically and spatially diverse Salix spp. plantations. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:821831.
80Williams P.A., Koblents H., and Gordon A.M. 1995. Bird use of an intercropped maize and old fields in southernOntario. In Proceedings of the Fourth North American Agroforestry Conference 1995, Boise, ID, USA. p. 158162.
81Naeem M., Compton S.G., Phillips D.S., and Incoll L.D. 1994. Factors influencing aphids and their parasitoids in a silvoarable agroforestry system. Agroforestry Forum 5(2):2023.
82Peng R.K., Incoll L.D., Sutton S.L., Wright C., and Chadwick A. 1993. Diversity of airborne arthropods in a silvoarable agroforestry system. Journal of Applied Ecology 30:551562.
83Phillips D.S., Griffiths J., Naeem M., Compton S.G., and Incoll L.D. 1994. Responses of crop pests and their natural enemies to an agroforestry envronment. Agroforestry Forum 5(2):1420.
84Stamps W.T., McGraw R.L., Godsey L., and Woods T.L. 2009. The ecology and economics of insect pest management in nut tree alley cropping systems in the Midwestern United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 131:48.
85Corbett A. and Rosenheim J.A. 1996. Impact of a natural enemy overwintering refuge and its interaction with the surrounding landscape. Ecological Entomology 21(2):155164.
86Murphy B.C., Rosenheim J.A., and Granett J. 1996. Habitat diversification for improving biological control: Abundance of Anagrus epos (Hymenoptera: Myrmaridae) in grape vineyards. Environmental Entomology 25(2):495504.
87Fürher E. and Fischer P. 1991. Towards integrated control of Cephalcia abietis, a defoliator of Norway Spruce in central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 39:8795.
88Griffiths J., Phillips D.S., Compton S.G., Wright C., and Incoll L.D. 1998. Responses of slug numbers and slug damage to crops in a silvoarable agroforestry landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:252260.
89Manning A.D., Gibbons P., and Lindenmayer D.B. 2009. Scattered trees: A complementary strategy for facilitating adaptive responses to climate change in modified landscapes? Journal of Applied Ecology 46:915919.
90Bhagwat S.A., Willis K.J., Birks H.J.B., and Whittaker R.J. 2008. Agroforestry: A refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23(5):261267.
91McNeely J.A. and Schroth G. 2006. Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation—traditional practices, present dynamics, and lessons for the future. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:549554.
92Harvey C.A. and Gonzalez-Villalobos J.A. 2007. Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:22572292.
93Bernier-Leduc M., Vanasse A., Olivier A., Bussières D., and Maisonneuve C. 2009. Avian fauna in windbreaks integrating shrubs that produce non-timber forest products. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 131:1624.
94Puckett H.L., Brandle J.R., Johnson R.J., and Blankenship E.E. 2009. Avian foraging patterns in crop field edges adjacent to woody habitat. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 131:915.
95Berges S.A., Moore L.A.S., Isenhart T.M., and Schultz R.C. 2010. Bird species diversity in riparian buffers, row crop fields, and grazed pastures within agriculturally dominated watersheds. Agroforestry Systems 79(1):97110.
96Gelling M., Macdonald D.W., and Mathews F. 2007. Are hedgerows the route to increased farmland small mammal density? Use of hedgerows in British pastoral habitats. Landscape Ecology 22:10191032.
97Perfecto I., Vandermeer J., and Wright A. 2009. Nature's Matrix: Linking Agriculture, Conservation and Food Sovereignty. Earthscan, London.
98McAdam J., Burgess P.J., Graves A.R., Rigueiro-Rodríguez A., and Mosquera-Losada M.R. 2008. Classifications and functions of agroforestry systems in Europe. In Rigueiro-Rodríguez A. et al. (eds). Agroforestry in Europe: Current Status and Future Prospects. Springer, Belfast. p. 2142.
99Ispikoudis I. and Sioliou K.M. 2005. Cultural aspects of silvopastoral systems, In Mosquera-Losada M.R., McAdam J., and Rigueiro-Rodríguez A. (eds). Silvopastoralism and Sustainable Land Management: Proceedings of an International Congress on Silvopastoralism and Sustainable Management held in Lugo, Spain 2004. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. p. 319323.
100Garrity D.P. 2004. Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millenium Development Goals. Agroforestry Systems 61:517.
101Mercer D.E. and Miller R.P. 1998. Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: Progress, prospects, priorities. Agroforestry Systems 38:177193.
102Yobterik A.C., Timmer V.R., and Gordon A.M. 1994. Screening agroforestry tree mulches for corn growth: A combined soil test, pot trial and plant analysis approach. Agroforestry Systems 25:153166.
103Mungai N.W., Motavalli P.P., Kremer R.J., and Nelson K.A. 2005. Spatial variation of soil enzyme activities and microbial functional diversity in temperate alley cropping systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils 42:129136.
104Udawatta R.P., Kremer R.J., Adamson B.W., and Anderson S.H. 2008. Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Applied Soil Ecology 39:153160.
105Lacombe S., Bradley R.L., Hamel C., and Beaulieu C. 2009. Do tree-based intercropping systems increase the diversity and stability of soil microbial communities? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 131:2531.
106Seiter S., Ingham E.R., and William R.D. 1999. Dynamics of soil fungal and bacterial biomass in a temperate climate alley cropping system. Applied Soil Ecology 12(2):139147.
107Lee K.H. and Jose S. 2003. Soil respiration and microbial biomass in a pecan-cotton alley cropping system in Southern USA. Agroforestry Systems 58:4554.
108Hijri I., Sykorova Z., Oehl F., Ineichen K., Mader P., Wiemken A., and Redecker D. 2006. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arable soils are not necessarily low in diversity. Molecular Ecology 15:22772289.
109Rillig M.C., Wright S.F., and Eviner V.T. 2002. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin in soil aggregation: Comparing effects of five plant species. Plant and Soil 238:325333.
110Schädler M., Brandl R., and Kempel A. 2010. ‘Afterlife’ effects of mycorrhisation on the decomposition of plant residues. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42:521523.
111Chifflot V., Rivest D., Olivier A., Cogliastro A., and Khasa D. 2009. Molecular analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal community structure and spores distribution in tree-based intercropping and forest systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 131:3239.
112Park J., Newman S.M., and Cousins S.H. 1994. The effects of poplar (P.trichocarpa×deltoides) on soil biological properties in a silvoarable system. Agroforestry Systems 25:111118.
113Price G.W. and Gordon A.M. 1999. Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworms in a temperate intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems 44:141149.
114Porter J., Costanza R., Sandhu H., Sigsgaard L., and Wratten S. 2009. The value of producing food, energy and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem. Ambio 38(4):186193.
115Cooper T., Hart K., and Baldock D. 2009. The provision of Public Goods through Agriculture in the European Union. Report prepared for DG Agriculture and Rural Development Contract no. 30-CE-0233091/00-28. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London.
116Oelbermann M., Voroney R.P., and Gordon A.M. 2004. Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: A review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104:359377.
117Smith J., Pearce B., and Wolfe M.S. 2012. A European perspective for developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, in press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 173 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 814 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.