No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Development of inspection magnetic wheel robot with pushing mechanism for flange running
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 August 2025
Abstract
In recent years, the deterioration of infrastructure facilities, such as bridges, has caused several problems. Currently, human inspectors conduct periodic inspections to identify damaged areas. However, this process is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, robotic inspection has received significant attention. This study focused on magnet-wheeled inspection robots operating along complex multilevel paths. The movement from the bottom to the top surface of the flanges was particularly difficult, similar to that of an overhanging steel plate. As the motor drives the robot wheel, gravity and anti-torque interfere with the robot’s movement along its path. However, static analysis shows that the impact can be reduced depending on the robot’s posture relative to that of the flange. Therefore, a magnetic-wheeled robot with a posture-changing pushing mechanism is proposed. This study confirms that the proposed robot can travel along its path using a pushing mechanism while carrying a 1.0 kg weight. Therefore, the robot’s ability to conduct inspections while carrying heavy equipment, such as inspection devices, was confirmed.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
“Spherical Gas Holder Inspection and Maintenance Work” [Internet]., 株式会社新成工業. [cited 2024 Nov 11]. Available at: http://shinseis.co.jp/portfolioview/%e7%90%83%e5%bd%a2%e3%82%ac%e3%82%b9%e3%83%9b%e3%83%ab%e3%83%80%e3%83%bc%e9%96%8b%e6%94%be%e6%a4%9c%e6%9f%bb%e5%b7%a5%e4%ba%8b/.Google Scholar
Sharp, I., “ITD conducting under bridge inspections for Perrine Bridge [Internet],” Idaho News 6 (2022) [cited 2024 Nov 11]. Available at: https://www.kivitv.com/ksaw/itd-conducting-under-bridge-inspections-for-perrine-bridge
Google Scholar
Metani, N. and Hamel, T., “A UAV for bridge inspection: Visual servoing control law with orientation limits,” Autom. Constr. 17(1), 3–10 (2007).10.1016/j.autcon.2006.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, S., Choi, D., Song, S. and Myung, H., “Bridge inspection using unmanned aerial vehicle based on HG-SLAM: Hierarchical graph-based SLAM,” Remote Sens. 12(18), 3022 (2020).10.3390/rs12183022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, J., Duque, L. and Wacker, J., “Drone-enabled bridge inspection methodology and application,” Autom. Constr. 94, 112–126 (2018).10.1016/j.autcon.2018.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolourian, N. and Hammad, A., “LiDAR-equipped UAV path planning considering potential locations of defects for bridge inspection,” Autom. Constr. 117, 103250 (2020).10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakao, M., Hasegawa, E., Kudo, T. and Sawasaki, N., “Development of a bridge inspection support robot system using two-wheeled multicopters,” J. Robot. Mechatron. 31(6), 837–844 (2019).10.20965/jrm.2019.p0837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, Y. and Okatani, T., “Development of UAV with passive rotating spherical shell for bridge inspection and its evaluation of inspection capability in real bridge,” 日本ロボット学会誌 34(2), 119–122 (2016) [Translated from Japanese].Google Scholar
Rizia, M., Reyes-Munoz, J. A., Ortega, A. G., Ahsan, C. and Flores-Abad, A., “Autonomous Aerial Flight Path Inspection Using Advanced Manufacturing Techniques,” In: Robotica (2022) pp. 2128–2151.Google Scholar
Bui, D.-N. and Phung, M. D., “Radial basis function neural networks for formation control of unmanned aerial vehicles,” Robotica 42(6), 1842–1860 (2024).10.1017/S0263574724000559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosales, C., Gandolfo, D., Scaglia, G., Jordan, M. and Carelli, R., “Trajectory tracking of a mini four-rotor helicopter in dynamic environments- a linear algebra approach,” Robotica 33(8), 1628–1652 (2014).10.1017/S0263574714000952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, W., Wang, Z., Wang, T., Ji, D. and Zhu, S., “A path tracking method of a wall-climbing robot towards autonomous inspection of steel box girder,” Machines 10(4), 256 (2022).10.3390/machines10040256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R. and Kawamura, Y., “An automated sensing system for steel bridge inspection using gmr sensor array and magnetic wheels of climbing robot,” J. Sens. 2016(1), 8121678 (2015).Google Scholar
Ekkachai, K., Leelasawassuk, T., Chaopramualkul, W., Komin, U., Kwansud, P., Bunnun, P., Komeswarakul, P., Tantaworrasilp, A., Seekhao, P., Nithi-uthai, S., Pudson, P., Vimolmongkolporn, V., Prakancharoen, S., Chaihan, R., Sothisansern, P., Surinkon, C., Covanich, W. and Tungpimolrut, K., “Development of the generator inspection vehicle and the inspection equipment,” J. Field Robot. 39(7), 1033–1053 (2022).10.1002/rob.22086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tâche, F., Fischer, W., Caprari, G., Siegwart, R., Moser, R. and Mondada, F., “Magnebike: A magnetic wheeled robot with high mobility for inspecting complex-shaped structures,” J. Field Robot. 26(5), 453–476 (2009).10.1002/rob.20296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, M., Viegas, C., Marques, L., Pires, J. N. and de Almeida, A. T., “OmniClimbers: Omni-directional magnetic wheeled climbing robots for inspection of ferromagnetic structures,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 61(9), 997–1007 (2013).10.1016/j.robot.2013.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pshenin, V., Liagova, A., Razin, A., Skorobogatov, A. and Komarovsky, M., “Robot crawler for surveying pipelines and metal structures of complex spatial configuration,” Infrastructures 7(6), 75 (2022).10.3390/infrastructures7060075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tâche, F., Pomerleau, F., Caprari, G., Siegwart, R., Bosse, M. and Moser, R., “Three-dimensional localization for the MagneBike inspection robot,” J. Field Robot. 28(2), 180–203 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J., Han, X., Tao, Y. and Feng, S., “A magnetic crawler wall-climbing robot with capacity of high payload on the convex surface,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 148, 103907 (2022).10.1016/j.robot.2021.103907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G., Li, W. and Che, H., “Design and analysis of anti-overturning mechanism for magnetic wall-climbing robot,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 38(1), 379–387 (2024).10.1007/s12206-023-1231-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, X., Guo, D. and Chen, Y., “Design and optimization of the magnetic adsorption mechanism of a pipeline-climbing robot,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 35(11), 5161–5171 (2021).Google Scholar
Parween, R., Tan, Y. W. and Elara, M. R., “Design and validation of a 3D printed vertical climbing robot for curved surface,” Mater. Today Proc. 70, 666–672 (2022).10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujisawa, R., Umemoto, K., Tanaka, M., Sato, N., Nagatani, N. and Katsuyama, M., “Development and operation of the wire-moving bridge inspection robot system ARANEUS,” 土木学会論文集F4 (建設マネジメント) 73(1), 26–37 (2017) [Translated from Japanese].Google Scholar
Ishida, T., Hirose, S. and Guarnieri, M., “Development of a wire-suspended bridge inspection robot system,” 土木学会論文集F4 (建設マネジメント) 76(1), 42–50 (2020) [Translated from Japanese].Google Scholar
Nguyen, S. T., La, K. T. and La, H. M., “Agile robotic inspection of steel structures: A bicycle-like approach with multisensor integration,” J Field Robot 41(2), 396–419 (2023).10.1002/rob.22266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürich, E. T. H. and ZHdK, SIR robot for inspection in vessels,” ETH Zurich (2015). Available at: https://www.sir.ethz.ch
Google Scholar
Tanida, M., Ono, K., Kobayashi, S., Shiba, T. and Takada, Y., “Study of magnetic wheels with planetary gears which make running on flange paths easy for magnetic wheeled robot,” 日本ロボット学会誌 42(1), 64–73 (2024) [Translated from Japanese].Google Scholar
Kawamoto, K., Matsumura, Y. and Takada, Y., “Development of four-wheel robot with magnets for moving through flange parts,” 日本機械学会 関西支部第93期定時総会講演会, (2018).Google Scholar
Nakajima, K., Shiba, T. and Takada, Y., “A development of magnetic-wheeled robot with high loading capacity and ability to travel through plate to plate and flange parts,” 関西支部講演会講演論文集 95 (2020) [Translated from Japanese].Google Scholar
Kobayashi, S., Nakajima, K., Shiba, T., Song, H. and Takada, Y., “Development of a flange traversal method for a magnetic wheel bridge inspection robot with high load capacity,” ロボティクス・メカトロニクス講演会講演概要集, (2021) [Translated from Japanese].Google Scholar
Matsumura, Y., Shiba, T., Ito, S., Kawase, Y. and Takada, Y., “Development of magnetic bridge inspection robot aimed at carrying heavy loads,” Int. J. Robot. Eng. 3(2), 1–0 (2018).Google Scholar
KLTD Co., Ltd [Internet], Portable ultrasonic flaw detector USFD-20. [cited 2024 Nov 1]. Available at: https://www.kjtd.co.jp/products/usfd/index.html.Google Scholar
Evident [Internet]., EPOCH 6LT. [cited 2024 Nov 1]. Available at: https://www.olympus-ims.com/ja/epoch-6lt/.Google Scholar
Skrinjar, L., Slavič, J. and Boltežar, M., “A review of continuous contact-force models in multibody dynamics,” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 145, 171–187 (2018).10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enferadi, J. and Jafari, K., “A Kane’s based algorithm for closed-form dynamic analysis of a new design of a 3RSS-S spherical parallel manipulator,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 49, 377–394 (2020).10.1007/s11044-020-09736-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, G.-C., Wang, D.-M., Xu, L.-J. and Gao, S., “The analytical dynamic model of six industrial robotic manipulators of containing closed chain,” Mech. Mach. Theory 40, 385–393 (2005).10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2004.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafei, H. R., Bahrami, M. and Talebi, H. A., “Disturbance observer-based two-layer control strategy design to deal with both matched and mismatched uncertainties,” Int. J. Robust. Nonlin. 31(5), 1640–1656 (2021).10.1002/rnc.5356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Chen, M. Z. Q. and Zhang, L., “Observer-based discrete-time sliding mode control for systems with unmatched uncertainties,” J. Frankl. Inst. 358(16), 8470–8484 (2021).10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.08.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar