Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-sz5hq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-11T17:04:55.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Configuration-based caging manipulation design for a cable-driven flexible arm with multi self-lockable links

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2025

Yufan Zhou Open the ORCID record for Yufan Zhou [Opens in a new window] ,
Zhongliang Jing ,
Jianzhe Huang ,
Xiangming Dun ,
Yinshuai Sun  and
Kai Jiang
Yufan Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Zhongliang Jing*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Jianzhe Huang
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Xiangming Dun
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Yinshuai Sun
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Kai Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
*
Corresponding author: Zhongliang Jing; Email: zljing@sjtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, the removal of orbital debris has become an increasingly urgent task due to advancements in human space exploration. Capturing space debris through caging manipulation offers notable advantages in terms of robustness and controllability. This paper proposes a configuration-based caging manipulation design method for a cable-driven flexible arm. First, the cable-driven flexible arm with multi self-lockable links is introduced. To quantify the caging configurations formed by different self-lockable link selections, a novel planar caging quality metric is then presented for arbitrary planar objects. Using this metric, a caging design method is developed for the flexible arm to conduct caging manipulations. Finally, the caging manipulation strategies are discussed with lock selection maps for different objects, and a robust caging strategy considering uncertainty is further explored. Simulation and experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed caging design method and demonstrate better performance compared to conventional caging methods.

Keywords

caging manipulationcaging graspmanipulation planning

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , First View , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Mark, C. P. and Kamath, S., “Review of active space debris removal methods,” Space Policy 47, 194–206 (2019).10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagaoka, K., Kameoka, R. and Yoshida, K., “Repeated impact-based capture of a spinning object by a dual-arm space robot,” Front Robot AI 5, 115 (2018).10.3389/frobt.2018.00115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botta, E. M., Miles, C. and Sharf, I., “Simulation and tension control of a tether-actuated closing mechanism for net-based capture of space debris,” Acta Astronaut. 174, 347–358 (2020).10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.04.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, M. and Shi, L., “Post-capture control of a tumbling space debris via tether tension,” Acta Astronaut. 180, 317–327 (2021).10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.12.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, W., “Problems On Polytopes and Convex Sets,” In: DIMACS Workshop On Polytopes, (1990) pp. 584–589.Google Scholar
Li, X., Qian, Y., Li, R., Niu, X. and Qiao, H., “Robust form-closure grasp planning for 4-pin gripper using learning-based attractive region in environment,” Neurocomputing 384, 268–281 (2020).10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bircher, W. G., Whole-Hand Robotic Manipulation with Rolling, Sliding, and Caging Ph.D. thesis, Yale University ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022. Available: https://www.proquest.com/openview/8cf2a932d38beab181b96225210a627e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.Google Scholar
Trinkle, J. C., Abel, J. M. and Paul, R. P., “An investigation of frictionless enveloping grasping in the plane,” Int. J. Robotics Res. 7(3), 33–51 (1988).10.1177/027836498800700303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberman, B. S., Whole-Arm Manipulation: Kinematics and Control Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989. Available: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0967-0661(18)30246-6/sb7.Google Scholar
Makita, S. and Wan, W., “A survey of robotic caging and its applications,” Adv. Robotics 31(19–20), 1071–1085 (2017).10.1080/01691864.2017.1371075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, J. K., Whole-Arm Manipulation, In: Proc. of the 4th Int. Symp. of Robotics Research, Santa Cruz, CA, Cambridge MA: Published by the MIT Press, (1987) pp. 183–189.Google Scholar
Su, J., Ou, Z. and Qiao, H., “Form-closure caging grasps of polygons with a parallel-jaw gripper,” Robotica 33(6), 1375–1392 (2015). doi: 10.1017/S0263574714000770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, W., Deng, Z., Chen, J., Nie, H. and Zhang, J., “Precision grasp planning for multi-finger hand to grasp unknown objects,” Robotica 37(8), 1415–1437 (2019). doi: 10.1017/S0263574719000031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamdad, M. and Bahri, M. M., “Kinematics and manipulability analysis of a highly articulated soft robotic manipulator,” Robotica 37(5), 868–882 (2019). doi: 10.1017/S0263574718001376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimon, E. and Blake, A., Caging 2d Bodies by 1-Parameter Two-fingered Gripping Systems, In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, IEEE (1996) pp. 1458–1464.10.1109/ROBOT.1996.506911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agabiti, C., Ménager, E. and Falotico, E., Whole-Arm Grasping Strategy for Soft Arms to Capture Space Debris, In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), IEEE (2023) pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Hu, Y., Li, Y., Ma, K., Wei, Y., Yang, J., Wu, Z., Rajabi, H., Peng, H. and Wu, J., “Versatile like a seahorse tail: A bio-inspired programmable continuum robot for conformal grasping,” Adv Intell Syst. 4(11), 2200263 (2022).10.1002/aisy.202200263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, W., Sun, C., Yuan, J., Hou, X., Guo, Y., Ou-yang, Y., Li, Q., Zhao, L., Shi, H. and Han, D., Adaptive Whole-Arm Grasping Approach of Tumbling Space Debris by Two Coordinated Hyper-redundant Manipulators, In: Intelligent Robotics and Applications: 12th International Conference, ICIRA 2019, Shenyang, China: Springer (2019) pp. 450–461, August 8-11, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 1210.1007/978-3-030-27526-6_39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Maeda, Y. and Komiyama, S., “Caging-based grasping of deformable objects for geometry-based robotic manipulation,” ROBOMECH J. 6(1), 1–13 (2019).10.1186/s40648-019-0131-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bircher, W. G., Morgan, A. S. and Dollar, A. M., “Complex manipulation with a simple robotic hand through contact breaking and caging,” Sci. Robot. 6(54), eabd2666 (2021).10.1126/scirobotics.abd2666CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beddow, L., Wurdemann, H. and Kanoulas, D., A Caging Inspired Gripper Using Flexible Fingers and a Movable Palm, In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE (2021), pp. 7195–7200.10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9635873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elangovan, N., Gerez, L., Gao, G. and Liarokapis, M., “Improving robotic manipulation without sacrificing grasping efficiency: A multi-modal, adaptive gripper with reconfigurable finger bases,” IEEE Access 9, 83298–83308 (2021). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makapunyo, T., Phoka, T., Pipattanasomporn, P., Niparnan, N. and Sudsang, A., Measurement Framework of Partial Cage Quality Based on Probabilistic Motion Planning, In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE (2013) pp. 1574–1579.10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makita, S. and Nagata, K., Evaluation of Finger Configuration for Partial Caging, In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE (2015) pp. 4897–4903.10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, J. Y. W. and Sun, C., The caging configuration design and optimization for planar moving objects using multi-fingered mechanism, Adv. Robot. 33(18), 925–943 (2019).10.1080/01691864.2019.1633955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirizly, A., Rimon, E. D. and Wan, W., “Contact space computation of two-finger gravity based caging grasps security measure,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6(2), 572–579 (2020).10.1109/LRA.2020.3047773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirizly, A. and Rimon, E. D., Computation and Selection of Secure Gravity Based Caging Grasps of Planar Objects, In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE (2022) pp. 1571–1578.10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9982151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, R. R., Bircher, W. G. and Dollar, A. M., Toward robust, whole-hand caging manipulation with underactuated hands, In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE (2017) pp. 1336–1342.10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bircher, W. G. and Dollar, A. M., DEsign Principles and Optimization of a Planar Underactuated Hand for Caging Grasps, In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE (2019) pp. 1608–1613.10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793465CrossRefGoogle Scholar