Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Design and kinematic analysis of redundantly actuated parallel mechanisms for ankle rehabilitation

  • Congzhe Wang (a1), Yuefa Fang (a1), Sheng Guo (a1) and Changchun Zhou (a1)
Summary
SUMMARY

In this paper, we present the design of two serial spherical mechanisms to substitute for a single spherical joint that is usually used to connect the platform with the base in three degrees of freedom parallel mechanisms. According to the principle derived from the conceptual design, through using the two serial spherical mechanisms as the constraint limb, several redundantly actuated parallel mechanisms are proposed for ankle rehabilitation. The proposed parallel mechanisms all can perform the rotational movements of the ankle in three directions while at the same time the mechanism center of rotations can match the ankle axes of rotations compared with other multi-degree-of-freedom devices, due to the structural characteristics of the special constraint limb and platform. Two special parallel mechanisms are selected to analyze their kinematical performances, such as workspace, dexterity, singularity, and stiffness, based on the computed Jacobian. The results show that the proposed scheme of actuator redundancy can guarantee that the redundantly actuated parallel mechanisms have no singularity, better dexterity, and stiffness within the prescribed workspace in comparison with the corresponding non-redundant parallel mechanisms. In addition, the proposed mechanisms possess certain reconfigurable capacity based on control strategies or rehabilitation modes to obtain sound performance for completing ankle rehabilitation exercise.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail: yffang@bjtu.edu.cn
References
Hide All
1.Díaz I., Gil J. J. and Sánchez E., “Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: literature review and challenges,” J. Robot. 2011, 111 (2011).
2.Blaya J. A. and Herr H., “Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthoses to assist drop-foot gait,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 12 (1), 2431 (2004).
3.Ferris D. P., Gordon K. E., Sawicki G. S. and Peethambaran A., “An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control,” Gait Posture 23, 425428 (2006).
4.Roy A., Krebs H. I., Williams D. J., Bever C. T., Forrester L. W., Macko R. M. and Hogan N., “Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: A novel robot for ankle re-habilitation,” IEEE Trans. Rob. 25 (3), 569582 (2009).
5.Dong S., Lu K. Q., Sun J. Q. and Rudolph K., “A prototype rehabilitation device with variable resistance and joint motion control,” Med. Eng. Phys. 28 (4), 348355 (2006).
6.Yoon J. and Ryu J., “A Novel Reconfigurable Ankle/Foot Rehabilitation Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, (Apr. 2005) pp. 22902295.
7.Ding Y., Sivak M., Weinberg B., Mavroidis C. and Holden M. K., “NUVABAT: Northeastern University Virtual Ankle and Balance Trainer,” IEEE Haptics Symposium, Waltham (Mar. 25–26, 2010) pp. 509514.
9.Girone M., Burdea G. and Bouzit M., “Rutgers ankle orthopedic rehabilitation interface,” Proc. ASMEDSC, 67, 305312 (1999).
10.Dai J. S. and Zhao T., “Sprained ankle physiotherapy based mechanism synthesis and stiffness analysis of a robotic rehabilitation device,” Auton. Robot 16 (2), 207218 (2004).
11.Liu G., Gao J., Yue H., Zhang X. and Lu G., “Design and Kinematics Analysis of Parallel Robots for Ankle Rehabilitation,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing (Oct. 9–15, 2006) pp. 253258.
12.Saglia J. A., Tsagarakis N. G., Dai J. S. and Caldwell D. G., “A High Performance 2-Dof Over-Actuated Parallel Mechanism for Ankle Rehabilitation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe (May 12–17, 2009) pp. 21802186.
13.Tsoi Y. H. and Xie S. Q., “Design and control of a parallel robot for ankle rehabilitation,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl. 8, 100113 (2010).
15.Sung E., Slocum A. H., Ma R., Bean J. F. and Culpepper M. L., “Design of an ankle rehabilitation device using compliant mechanisms,” J. Med. Device 5 (1), 01101–7 (2011).
16.Dettwyler M., Stacoff A., Quervain I. A. and Stussi E., “Modelling of ankle joint complex. Reflections with regards to ankle prostheses,” Foot Ankle Surg. 10 (3), 109119 (2004).
17.Clavel R., “Device for the movement and positioning of an element in space,” U.S. Patent, 4976582 (1990).
18.Company O., Marquet F. and Pierrot F., “A new high-speed 4-DOF parallel robot synthesis and modeling issues,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19 (3), 411420 (2003).
19.Siciliano B., “The Tricept robot: Inverse kinematics, manipulability analysis and closed-loop direct kinematics algorithm,” Robotica 17 (4), 437445 (1999).
20.Gosselin C. M. and Hamel J., “The Agile Eye: A high –Performance Three-Degree-of-Freedom Camera-Orienting Device,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego (1994) pp. 781786.
21.Gallardo-Alvarado J., Ramirez-Agundis A., Rojas-Garduno H. and Arroyo-Ramirez B., “Kinematics of an asymmetrical three-legged parallel manipulator by means of the screw theory,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45, 10131023 (2010).
22.Merlet J. P., “Jacobian, manipulability, condition number, and accuracy of parallel robot,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 128 (1), 199206 (2006).
23.Saglia J. A., Dai J. S. and Caldwell D. G., “Geometry and kinematic analysis of a redundantly actuated parallel mechanism that eliminates singularities and improves dexterity,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 130 (12), 124501–5 (2008).
24.Gosselin C. M. and Angeles J., “Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 6 (3), 281290 (1990).
25.Fang Y. F. and Tsai L. W., “Structure synthesis of a class of 4-DOF and 5-DOF parallel manipulators with identical limb structures,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 21 (9), 799810 (2002).
26.Joshi S. and Tsai L. W., “A comparison study of two 3-DOF parallel manipulators: One with three and the other with four supporting limbs,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19, 200209 (2003).
27.Li Y. and Xu Q., “Stiffness analysis for a 3-PUU parallel kinematic machine,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43, 186200 (2008).
28.Shin H., Lee S., Jeong J. I. and Kim J., “Antagonistic stiffness optimization of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators in a predefined workspace,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 18 (3), 11611169 (2013).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Robotica
  • ISSN: 0263-5747
  • EISSN: 1469-8668
  • URL: /core/journals/robotica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 255 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.