Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:10:44.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Changing Nature of Modernization Discourses in Documentary Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Carlos Tabernero
Carlos Tabernero*
Affiliation:
Centre for the History of Science (CEHIC), Autonomous University of Barcelona E-mail: carlos.tabernero@uab.cat; ceth66@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Franco's fascist regime in Spain (1939-1975) offers the possibility of exploring the complex relationship between media communication practices and the processes of production, circulation, and management of knowledge. The regime persistently used film, and later on television, as indoctrination and disciplining devices. These media thus served to shape the regime's representation, which largely relied on the generation of positive attitudes of adherence to the rulers through people's submission and obedience to experts. This article examines the changing nature of modernization discourses and practices, as a fundamental element of the regime's propaganda strategies, and as portrayed in documentaries produced under its rule. The rhetoric of modernization involved an explicit deficit model of knowledge management, which aimed at legitimating the regime's deeds and policies in its first decades, as we shall see regarding colonial-medical documentaries produced for the official newsreel in the 1940s. However, the focus of such rhetoric, despite its enduring political aims, had to somehow open up as the relationship between experts and non-experts changed, both in epistemological and practical terms, such as in wildlife documentary films produced for television in the 1970s, the regime's last decade.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 31 , Issue 1: Science in Film and the Deficit Model , March 2018 , pp. 61 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcalá-Lorente, Mònica. 2017. “Discursos en torno a la colonialidad en Arrowsmith (John Ford, 1931).” Medicina e Historia 2 (2017):4–14.Google Scholar
Alcalá-Lorente, Mònica, and Tabernero, Carlos. 2016. “El espectáculo de la conservación: El Parque Nacional de Doñana en ‘El Hombre y la Tierra’ (1979).” Arbor 192 (781):a347. <http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/2151/2876> (last accessed 24 January 2018)Google Scholar
Araújo, Joaquín. 1990. La Voz de la Naturaleza: Biografía de Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente. Barcelona: Salvat.Google Scholar
Bauer, Martin W. 2009. “The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science: Discourse and Comparative Evidence.” Science, Technology & Society 14 (2):221–240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Erin, and Gray, Ann. 2007. “History on Television: Charisma, Narrative and Knowledge”. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10 (1):113–133.Google Scholar
Bousé, Derek. 2000. Wildlife Films. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bräuchler, Birgit, and Postill, John. 2010. Theorising Media and Practice. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Boon, Timothy. 2008. Films of Fact: A History of Science in Documentary Film and Television. London and New York: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
Boon, Timothy. 2014a. “Formal Conventions in British Science Television (1955-1965).” Actes d'Història de la Ciència i de la Tècnica 7:51–69.Google Scholar
Boon, Timothy. 2014b. “‘The Televising of Science Is a Process of Television’: Establishing Horizon, 1962–1967.” British Journal for the History of Science 48 (1):87–121.Google Scholar
Boon, Timothy, and Gouyon, Jean-Baptiste. 2014. “The Origins and Practice of Science on British Television.” In The Routledge Companion to British Media History, edited by Conboy, Martin and Steel, John, 470–483. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brockington, Dan. 2008. “Powerful Environmentalisms: Conservation, Celebrity and Capitalism.” Media, Culture & Society 30 (4):551–568.Google Scholar
Cabeza, José, and Gómez, Salvador. 2012. “El diseño de la realidad televisiva en el documental de naturaleza: El Hombre y la Tierra. Serie Venezolana (Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente, 1974).” Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 18 (1):275–291.Google Scholar
Cabeza, José. 2014. “Planeta azul (Rodríguez de la Fuente, 19681974): Un laboratorio del documental moderno de naturaleza.” Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 20 (Especial):193–208.Google Scholar
Camprubí, Lino. 2014. Engineers and the Making of the Francoist Regime. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Camprubí, Lino. 2016. “La naturaleza no existe: Conservacionismos y relaciones internacionales en Doñana.” Arbor 192 (781):a344. <http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/2148/2867> (last accessed 24 January 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chris, Cynthia. 2006. Watching Wildlife. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Chuliá, Elisa. 1997. “Evolución silenciosa de las dictaduras: El régimen de Franco ante la prensa y el periodismo.” PhD thesis. Madrid: Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Corbelle-Rico, Eduardo, and Boquete, Eduardo Rico. 2008. “La actividad de las Juntas de Extinción de Animales Dañinos en España, 1944–1968.” In Ayeres en discusión: temas clave de historia contemporánea hoy, edited by Encarna, María, Marín, Nicolás, and Martínez, Carmen González, 1800–1820. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick. 2004. “Theorising Media as Practice.” Social Semiotics 14 (2):115–132.Google Scholar
Cripps, Thomas. 1993. Slow Fade to Black: The Negro in American Film, 1900–1942. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Gail. 1998. Networks of Nature: Stories of Natural History Film-making at the BBC. PhD Thesis. <https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/14290> (last accessed 24 January 2018)+(last+accessed+24+January+2018)>Google Scholar
Davies, Gail. 2000. “Science, Observation and Entertainment: Competing Visions of Postwar British Natural History Television, 1946–1967.” Cultural Geographies 7 (4):432–460.Google Scholar
Elena, Alberto. 2001. “Spanish Colonial Cinema: Contours and Singularities.” Journal of Film Preservation 63:29–35.Google Scholar
Ellwood, Sheelagh. 1987. “Spanish Newsreels 1943–1973: The Image of the Franco Regime.” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 7 (3):225–238.Google Scholar
FFRF [Fundación Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente]. 1965. Rodríguez de la Fuente's letter to Carmelo Martínez. Madrid: Archive.Google Scholar
FFRF [Fundación Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente]. 1967. Spectator's letter to Rodríguez de la Fuente. Madrid: Archive.Google Scholar
FFRF [Fundación Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente]. 1968. Manuel de la Rosa Uclés’ letter to Rodríguez de la Fuente. Madrid: Archive.Google Scholar
FFRF [Fundación Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente]. 1975. Spectator's letter to Rodríguez de la Fuente. Madrid: Archive.Google Scholar
FFRF [Fundación Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente]. 2006. Félix, 25 años de conciencia ecológica. Madrid: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
Florensa, Clara. 2017. “Evolucionisme, Esglèsia i Estat a l'Espanya de Franco: L'evolucionisme en negociació.” PhD thesis. Bellaterra (Barcelona): Center for the History of Science (CEHIC-UAB).Google Scholar
Florensa, Clara; Hochadel, Oliver, and Tabernero, Carlos. 2014a. “Science on Television: Theory Meets Practice. An Introduction.” Actes d'Història de la Ciència i de la Tècnica 7:11–16.Google Scholar
Florensa, Clara; Hochadel, Oliver, and Tabernero, Carlos. 2014b. “Science on Television: Audiencies, Markets and Authority. Some Conclusions.” Actes d'Història de la Ciència i de la Tècnica 7: 127–136.Google Scholar
Fígares, María D. 2003. La colonización del imaginario: Imágenes de África. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Gil-Farrero, Judit. 2016. “La percepción del medio ambiente en el post-franquismo: La emergencia de los Parques Nacionales en Cataluña (1975-1990s)”. Arbor 192 (781):a348. <http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/2152/2879> (last accessed 24 January 2018)Google Scholar
Gilman, Nils. 2003. Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gouyon, Jean-Baptiste. 2011. “The BBC Natural History Unit: Instituting Natural History Film-making in Britain”. History of Science 49:425–451.Google Scholar
Gouyon, Jean-Baptiste. 2014. “Making Science at Home: Visual Displays of Space Science and Nuclear Physics at the Science Museum and on Television in Postwar Britain.” History and Technology 30 (1–2):37–60.Google Scholar
Gouyon, Jean-Baptiste. 2016. “1985, Scientists Can't Do Science Alone, They Need Publics.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (6):754–757.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. [2013] 2014. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason and the Gap between Us and Them. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Gubern, Román. 2004. Historia del cine español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Guzman, Meritxell, and Tabernero, Carlos. 2016. “The City in Waves: Radio Barcelona and Urban Everyday Life.” In Barcelona (1888-1929): An Urban History of Science and Modernity, edited by Hochadel, Oliver and Nieto-Galan, Agustí, 200–222. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamilton, S. 2016. “Activismo medioambiental en la época tardofranquista: El caso de El Saler.” Arbor 192 (781):a346. <http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/2150/2873> (last accessed January 24, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrán, Néstor, and Roqué, Xavier. 2012. La física en la dictadura: Físicos, cultura y poder en España 1939–1975. Bellaterra (Barcelona): Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses." Social Studies of Science 20:519–539.Google Scholar
Horst, Maja, and Michael, Mike. 2011. “On the Shoulders of Idiots: Re-thinking Science Communication as ‘Event’.” Science as Culture 20 (3):283–306.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Lucena, Isabel. 2011. “ Differences, Paradoxes and Exclusions Regarding Abortion. A Possible Interpretation of a Story of Women and Vera Drake.” Journal of Medicine and Movies 7 (2):61–68.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Lucena, Isabel, Somavilla, María José Ruiz, and Guerrero, Jesús Castellanos. 2002. “Un discurso sanitario para un proyecto político: La educación sanitaria en los medios de comunicación de masas durante el primer franquismo.” Asclepio 54 (1):201–218.Google Scholar
Kirby, David. 2008. “Hollywood Knowledge: Communication between Scientific and Entertainment Cultures.” In Communicating Science in Social Contexts, edited by Cheng, Donghong et al., 165–181. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kirby, David. 2010. “The Future Is Now: Diegetic Prototypes and the Role of Popular Films in Generating Real-World Technological Development.” Social Studies of Science 40 (1):41–70.Google Scholar
Kusiak, Pauline. 2010. “Instrumentalized Rationality, Cross-Cultural Mediators, and Civil Epistemologies of Late Colonialism.” Social Studies of Science 40 (6):871–902.Google Scholar
LaFollette, Marcel C. 2012. Science on American Television: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latham, Michael E. 2000. Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Lysa L. 2000. “Arrowsmith Goes Native: Medicine and Empire in Fiction and Film.” Mosaic 33 (4):193–208.Google Scholar
Matud-Juristo, Álvaro. 2008. “La incorporación del cine documental al proyecto de NO-DO.” Historia y Comunicación Social 13:105–118 Google Scholar
Medina-Doménech, Rosa M., and Menéndez-Navarro, Alfredo. 2005. “Cinematic Representations of Medical Technologies in the Spanish Official Newsreel, 1943–1970.” Public Understanding of Science 14:393–408.Google Scholar
Medina-Doménech, Rosa M. 2009. “Scientific Technologies of National Identity as Colonial Legacies: Extracting the Spanish Nation from Equatorial Guinea.” Social Studies of Science 39 (1):81–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, Jerry Z. 2008. Us and Them: The Enduring Power of Ethnic Nationalism. Foreign Affairs 87 (2):18–35.Google Scholar
Nieto-Galan, Agustí. [2011] 2016. Science in the Public Sphere: A History of Lay Knowledge and Expertise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Official State Gazette [Boletín Oficial del Estado, BOE]. 1938. “Press Act [Ley de Prensa]”. BOE 549: 6915–6917 <https://www.boe.es/datos/pdfs/BOE//1938/549/A06915-06917.pdf>; BOE 550: 6938–6940 <https://www.boe.es/datos/pdfs/BOE//1938/550/A06938-06940.pdf>.;+BOE+550:+6938–6940+.>Google Scholar
Official State Gazette [Boletín Oficial del Estado, BOE]. 1959. “Decree-law of Economic Ordinance [Decreto-Ley de Ordenación Económica]”. BOE 174: 10005–10007. <http://www.boe.es/datos/pdfs/BOE/1959/174/A10005-10007.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Official State Gazette [Boletín Oficial del Estado, BOE]. 1966. Act 14/1966 [Ley de Prensa e Imprenta]. BOE 67: 3310–3315. <https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1966-3501>..>Google Scholar
Ortega Gálvez, María L., and Albertos, Ana. 1998. “La ciencia en Televisión Española: Primeros acercamientos a la divulgación.” Secuencias 8:61–74.Google Scholar
Ortega, Bienvenido, and Núñez, J. Aníbal. 2002. “El proceso de crecimiento de la economía española (I): Los cambios que introduce el Decreto-Ley de Ordenación Económica de 21 de julio de 1959.” In Economía Española, coordinated by Chacón, Elvira Martínez, 57–82. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Ortín, Pere, and Pereiró, Vic. 2006. Mbini: Cazadores de imágenes en la Guinea colonial. Barcelona: Altair/WAHF.Google Scholar
Ostherr, Kirsten. 2013. Medical Visions: Producing the Patient Through Film, Television, and Imaging Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pou, Miguel. 1995. Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente: El hombre y su obra. Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
Preston, Paul. 1994. Franco: A Biography. New York: Basic Books / Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Ramírez-Martínez, Felipe E. 2006. “Ciencia, tecnología y propaganda: El NO-DO, un instrumento de popularización de la ciencia al servicio del Estado (1943-1957).” In El pensamiento científico en la sociedad actual, edited by Ordóñez, Javier, 253–261. Madrid: MEC.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Jiménez, Fernando L. 2006. Así se hizo: 1. El Hombre y la Tierra. Madrid: Naturaventur.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Tranche, Rafael, and Sánchez-Biosca, Vicente. 2001. NO-DO, el tiempo y la memoria. Madrid: Cátedra/Filmoteca Española Google Scholar
Romero de Pablos, Ana, and Santesmases, María J.. 2008. Cien años de política científica en España. Madrid: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
Rueda Laffond, José Carlos, and Ruiz, Carlota Coronado. 2010. “La codificación televisiva del franquismo: De la historia del entretenimiento a la historia como entretenimiento.” Historia Crítica 40:170–195.Google Scholar
Salcedo de Prado, Míriam. 2008. El documental de divulgación científica sobre la naturaleza: Técnicas narrativo-dramáticas y retóricas empleadas por Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente en ‘El Hombre y la Tierra’. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Scott, Karen D. 2003. “Popularizing Science and Nature Programming: The Role of ‘Spectacle’ in Contemporary Wildlife Documentary.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 31 (1):29–35.Google Scholar
Secord, James A. 2004. “Knowledge in Transit.” Isis 95:654–672 Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shinn, Terry, and Whitley, Richard P.. 1985. Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Dordretch, Boston and Lancaster: Reidel.Google Scholar
Tabernero, Carlos. 2016. “‘La libertad de todos los seres vivos’. Naturaleza, ciencias naturales y la imagen de España en la obra de Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente.” Arbor 192 (781):a345. <http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/2149/2870> (last accessed 24 January 2018)Google Scholar
Tabernero, Carlos, Jiménez, Isabel Lucena, and Molero, Jorge. 2012. “Scientific-Medical Knowledge Management through Media Communication Practices: A Review of Two Opposite Models in Early 20th Century Spain.” Journal of History of Science and Technology 6 (Fall):64–84.Google Scholar
Tabernero, Carlos, Jiménez, Isabel Lucena, and Molero, Jorge. 2013. “Libertarian Movement and Self-Management of Knowledge in the Spain of the First Third of the 20th Century: The ‘Questions and Answers’ Section (1930–1937) of the Journal ‘Estudios’.” Dynamis 33 (1):43–67.Google Scholar
Tabernero, Carlos, Jiménez, Isabel Lucena, and Molero, Jorge. 2017. “Colonial Scientific-Medical Documentary Films and the Legitimating of an Ideal State in 1940s Post-War Spain.” História, Ciencias, Saúde – Manguinhos 24 (2):349–369.Google Scholar
Taibo, Paco Ignacio. 2002. Un cine para un imperio: Películas en la España de Franco. Madrid: Oberon.Google Scholar
The Royal Society. 1985. The Public Understanding of Science. <https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/1985/10700.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1995. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Varillas, Benigno. 2010. Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente: Su vida, mensaje de futuro. Madrid: Fundación Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente/La Esfera de los Libros.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Helen. 2004. “The Limits of Television? Natural History Programming and the Transformation of Public Service Broadcasting.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 7 (3):325–339.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Helen. 2013. “At Home on Safari: Colonial Spectacle, Domestic Space and 1950s Television.” Journal of British Cinema and Television. 10 (2):257–275.Google Scholar