Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:04:27.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Safening Influence of LAB 145 138 on Nicosulfuron, Terbufos and Bentazon Interactions in Sweet Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Darren K. Robinson ,
David W. Monks  and
James D. Burton
Darren K. Robinson
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
James D. Burton
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

LAB 145 138 (LAB) was evaluated as a safener to improve sweet corn tolerance to nicosulfuron applied POST alone or with terbufos applied in the planting furrow or bentazon applied POST. To ensure enhanced injury for experimental purposes, nicosulfuron was applied at twice the registered rate alone or mixed with bentazon at the six- to seven-leaf growth stage of corn previously treated with the highest labeled rate of terbufos 15 G formulation. LAB applied as a seed treatment (ST) or POST at the two- to three-, four- to five-, or six- to seven-leaf growth stages reduced height reduction and yield loss from nicosulfuron applied POST in combination with terbufos applied in-furrow. LAB applied POST at the four- to five-leaf growth stage was most effective in preventing injury from this treatment, with yield reduced only 8% compared with 54% from the nicosulfuron and terbufos treatment. LAB applied POST at the eight- to nine-leaf growth stage did not alleviate injury. With the nicosulfuron, terbufos, and bentazon combination, LAB applied POST at the three- to four- or six- to seven-leaf growth stages decreased height reduction and yield loss caused by this combination, with LAB at the three- to four-leaf growth stage being most effective.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideLAB 145 138, 1-dichloroacetylhexahydro-3,3,8-α-trimethylpyrrolo-(1,2-α)-pyrimidin-6-(2H)onenicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]-carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridine carbox-amideterbufos, S-[[(l,ldimethylethyl)thio]methyl] O,O diethylphosphorodithioatesweet corn, Zea mays L. ‘How Sweet It Is.’
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 339 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Monaco, T. J. 1991. Vegetable crops. Pages 362–345 in Ashton, F. M. and Monaco, T. J., eds. Weed Science Principles and Practices. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Barrett, M. 1989. Protection of grass crops from sulfonylurea and imidazolinone toxicity. Pages 205–232 in Hatzios, K. K. and Hoagland, R. E., eds. Crop Safeners for Herbicides: Development, Uses and Mechanism of Action. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
3. Burton, J. D., Maness, E. P., Monks, D. W., and Robinson, D. K. 1994. Sulfonylurea selectivity and safener activity in ‘Landmark’ and ‘Merit’ sweet corn. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 48: 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Herbicide interactions with herbicides, synergists, and safeners. Pages 333–347 in Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. Physiology of Herbicide Action. P.T.R. Prentice Hall, Prinsten, NJ.Google Scholar
5. Evans, J. R., Carlson, D. R., McKemie, T. E., and Harrell, A. L. 1991. Interaction of bentazon and nicosulfuron on corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc.44:165.Google Scholar
6. Eberlein, C. V., Rosow, K. M., Geadelmann, J. L., and Openshaw, S. J. 1989. Differential tolerance of corn genotypes to DPX-M6316. Weed Sci. 37: 651–657.Google Scholar
7. Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41: 508–516.Google Scholar
8. Hatzios, K.K. 1989. Development of Herbicide Safeners: Industrial and University Perspectives. Pages 3–38 in Hatzios, K. K. and Hoagland, R. E., eds. Crop Safeners for Herbicides: Development, Uses and Mechanism of Action. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Lamoureux, G. L. and Rusness, D. G. 1992. The mechanism of action of BAS 145 138 as a safener for chlorimuron ethyl in corn: effect on hydroxylation, glutathione conjugation, glucoside conjugation, and acetolactate synthase. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 42: 128–139.Google Scholar
10. Monks, D. W. and Monaco, T. J. 1994. Chemical weed control in vegetable crops. Pages 283–295 in Knecht, T. W. ed. North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual. College of Agri. and Life Sci., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
11. Monks, D. W., Mullins, C. A., and Johnson, K. E. 1992. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6: 280–283.Google Scholar
12. Morse, P. M. 1978. Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci. 26: 58–71.Google Scholar
13. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Landis, D. A., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1993. In-furrow terbufos reduces field and sweet corn (Zea mays) tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7: 934–939.Google Scholar
14. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Wedberg, J. L., Kells, J. J., Landis, D. A., and Ieschenn, W. E. 1994. Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 8: 289–295.Google Scholar
15. Parera, C. A. and Cantliffe, D. J. 1992. Enhanced emergence and seedling vigor in shrunken-2 sweet corn via seed disinfection and solid matrix priming. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117: 400–403.Google Scholar
16. Peirce, L. C. 1987. Sweet corn. Pages 383–399 in Peirce, L. C. ed. Vegetables: Characteristics, Production, and Marketing. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto.Google Scholar
17. Sorenson, K. A., Kennedy, G. G. and Walgenbach, J. F. 1994. Insect control for commercial vegetables. Pages 84–109 in Knecht, T. W. ed. North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual. College of Agri. and Life Sci., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
18. Rahman, A. and James, T. K. 1993. Enhanced activity of nicosulfuron in combination with soil-applied insecticides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 824–829.Google Scholar
19. Robinson, D. K. 1993. Methods of improving sweet corn (Zea mays) tolerance to nicosulfuron. . Dep. Hortic. Sci. N.C. State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
20. Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., and Burton, J. D. 1993. Potential safeners for protecting sweet corn from nicosulfuron injury. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46: 118.Google Scholar
21. Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., Schultheis, J. R., and Worsham, A. D. 1993. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to application timing of nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7: 840–843.Google Scholar
22. Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., and Schultheis, J. R. 1994. Effect of nicosulfuron applied postemergence and postdirected on sweet corn (Zea mays) tolerance. Weed Technol. 8: 630–634.Google Scholar
23. Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., and Burton, J. D. 1994. Effect of BAS 145 138, CGA 154 281 and naphthalic anhydride seed treatments on sweet corn (Zea mays) tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Sci. 42: 614–617.Google Scholar
24. Stall, W. M. and Bewick, T. A. 1992. Sweet corn cultivars respond differently to the herbicide nicosulfuron. Hortic. Sci. 27: 131–133.Google Scholar
25. Styer, R. C. and Cantliffe, D. J. 1983. Relationship between environment during seed development and seed vigor of two endosperm mutants of corn. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108: 717–720.Google Scholar
26. Styer, R. C. and Cantliffe, D. J. 1983. Changes in seed structure and composition during development and their effects on leakage in two endosperm mutants of sweet corn. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108: 721–728.Google Scholar
27. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17: 18–23.Google Scholar
28. Waters, L. Jr. and Blanchette, B. L. 1983. Prediction of sweet corn field emergence by conductivity and cold tests. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108: 778–781.Google Scholar