Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-mhzq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T09:59:45.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An implausible model and evolutionary explanation of the revenge motive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Herbert Gintis
Herbert Gintis*
Affiliation:
Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, and Department of Economics, Central European University, Nádor utca 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary. hgintis@comcast.nethttp://www.santafe.eduhttp://people.umass.edu/gintis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

McCullough et al.'s target article is a psychological version of the reputation models pioneered by biologist Robert Trivers (1971) and economist Robert Frank (1988). The authors, like Trivers and Frank, offer an implausible explanation of the fact that revenge is common even when there are no possible reputational effects. I sketch a more plausible model based on recent research.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 21 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boehm, C. (2011) Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2011) A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Gintis, H. & Bowles, S. (2010) Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328:617–20.Google Scholar
Buchholtz, J. W., Asplund, C. L., Dux, P. E., Zald, D. H., Gore, J. C., Jones, O. D. & Marois, R. (2008) The neural correlates of third- party punishment. Neuron 930–40.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1997) Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1902/1967) De La division du travail social. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2004) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior 25:63–87.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. (1998) How effective are trust- and reciprocity-based incentives? In: Economics, values and organizations, ed. Putterman, Louis & Ben-Ner, Avner, pp. 337–63. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1988) Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. Norton.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, D., Levine, D. K. & Maskin, E. (1994) The folk theorem with imperfect public information. Econometrica 62:997–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H. (2000) Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology 206:169–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H. (2003) The hitchhiker's guide to altruism: Genes, culture, and the internalization of norms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 220(4):407–18.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2009) The bounds of reason: Game theory and the unification of the behavioral sciences. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. (2005) Moral sentiments and material interests: On the foundations of cooperation in economic life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K. (1993) Why hunter-fatherers work: An ancient version of the problem of public goods. Current Anthropology 34(4):341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E. & Gintis, H. (2004) Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q. & Tracer, D. (2005) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):795–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F. W., Tracer, D. & Ziker, J. (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312:1767–70.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Hawkes, K. & Hurtado, A. M. (1984) Food sharing among Ache hunter-gatherers of Eastern Paraguay. Current Anthropology 25(1):113–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M. & Wilson, R. (1982) Sequential equilibria. Econometrica 50(4):863–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967) Sociological theory and modern society. Free Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. M. (1993) Reputation and equilibrium characterization in repeated games of conflicting interests. Econometrica 61:325–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. (1990) A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science 250:1665–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46(1):35–57.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1998) Hunting, sharing, and multilevel selection: The tolerated theft model revisited. Current Anthropology 39:73–97.Google Scholar