Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T19:39:19.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mending wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2019

Charles Rathkopf Open the ORCID record for Charles Rathkopf [Opens in a new window]  and
Daniel C. Dennett Open the ORCID record for Daniel C. Dennett [Opens in a new window]
Charles Rathkopf
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany. c.rathkopf@fz-juelich.dehttp://charlesrathkopf.net/
Daniel C. Dennett
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155. daniel.dennett@tufts.eduhttp://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heyes suggests that selective social learning comes in two varieties. One is common, domain general, and associative. The other is rare, domain specific, and metacognitive. We argue that this binary distinction cannot quite do the work she assigns it and sketch a framework in which additional strategies for selective social learning might be accommodated.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e181
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2007) Enculturated chimpanzees imitate rationally. Developmental Science 10(4):31–38.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1983) Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The “Panglossian paradigm” defended. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6(3):343–55.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2013) Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2017) From bacteria to Bach and back: The evolution of minds. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (1914) North of Boston. David Nutt.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018) Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGuigan, N. (2013) The influence of model status on the tendency of young children to over-imitate. Journal of experimental child psychology 116(4):962–69.Google Scholar
Middlebrooks, P. G. & Sommer, M. A. (2012) Neuronal correlates of metacognition in primate frontal cortex. Neuron 75(3):517–30.Google Scholar
Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C. M. & Frith, C. D. (2014) Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 186–193.Google Scholar
Subiaul, F., Cantlon, J. F., Holloway, R. L. & Terrace, H. S. (2004) Cognitive imitation in rhesus macaques. Science 305(5682):407–10.Google Scholar