Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T11:45:57.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dreams are made of memories, but maybe not for memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2013

Mark Blagrove
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom. m.t.blagrove@swansea.ac.uk j.r.eichenlaub@swansea.ac.uk www.swansea.ac.uk/sleeplab
Perrine Ruby
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom. m.t.blagrove@swansea.ac.uk j.r.eichenlaub@swansea.ac.uk www.swansea.ac.uk/sleeplab Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, 69675 Bron Cedex, France. perrine.ruby@inserm.fr http://sites.google.com/site/perrineruby
Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom. m.t.blagrove@swansea.ac.uk j.r.eichenlaub@swansea.ac.uk www.swansea.ac.uk/sleeplab

Abstract

Llewellyn's claim that rapid eye movement (REM) dream imagery may be related to the processes involved in memory consolidation during sleep is plausible. However, whereas there is voluntary and deliberate intention behind the construction of images in the ancient art of memory (AAOM) method, there is a lack of intentionality in producing dream images. The memory for dreams is also fragile, and dependent on encoding once awake.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable