Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T08:54:38.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A systematic evaluation of different indoor localization methods in robotic autonomous luggage trolley collection at airports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2024

Zhirui Sun Open the ORCID record for Zhirui Sun [Opens in a new window] ,
Weinan Chen Open the ORCID record for Weinan Chen [Opens in a new window] ,
Can He Open the ORCID record for Can He [Opens in a new window]  and
Jiankun Wang Open the ORCID record for Jiankun Wang [Opens in a new window]
Zhirui Sun
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Robotics Perception and Intelligence, and the Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China Jiaxing Research Institute, Southern University of Science and Technology, Jiaxing, China
Weinan Chen
Affiliation:
Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Can He
Affiliation:
Jiaxing Research Institute, Southern University of Science and Technology, Jiaxing, China
Jiankun Wang*
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Robotics Perception and Intelligence, and the Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China Jiaxing Research Institute, Southern University of Science and Technology, Jiaxing, China
*
Corresponding author: Jiankun Wang; Email: wangjk@sustech.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the localization problem in robotic autonomous luggage trolley collection at airports and provides a systematic evaluation of different methods to solve it. The robotic autonomous luggage trolley collection is a complex system that involves object detection, localization, motion planning and control, manipulation, etc. Among these components, effective localization is essential for the robot to employ subsequent motion planning and end-effector manipulation because it can provide a correct goal position. This article explores four popular and representative localization methods for object localization in luggage trolley collection: radio frequency identification (RFID), Keypoints, ultrawideband (UWB), and Reflectors. A qualitative evaluation framework is constructed to assess performance, encompassing Localization Accuracy, Mobile Power Supplies, Coverage Area, Cost, and Scalability. Furthermore, a series of quantitative experiments concerning Localization Accuracy and Success Rate have been conducted on a real-world robotic autonomous luggage trolley collection system. The performance of various localization methods is further analyzed based on experimental results, indicating that the Keypoints method is optimally suited for indoor environments to facilitate luggage trolley collection. Significantly, these experiment results provide a valuable reference point, extending the application of indoor localization methods across diverse scenarios. A website about this work is available at https://sites.google.com/view/localization-evaluation/.

Keywords

indoor localization methodsevaluation frameworkrobotic autonomous luggage trolley collection

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , February 2025 , pp. 542 - 560
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Wang, J., Chen, W., Xiao, X., Xu, Y., Li, C., Jia, X. and Meng, M. Q.-H., “A survey of the development of biomimetic intelligence and robotics,” Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics 1, 100001 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobrepera, M. J., Nguyen, A. T., Gavin, E. S. and Johnson, M. J., “Insights into the deployment of a social robot-augmented telepresence robot in an elder care clinic – perspectives from patients and therapists: A pilot study,” Robotica 42(5), 1321–1349 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Wang, C., Chi, W., Chen, G. and Sun, L., “Estimated path information gain-based robot exploration under perceptual uncertainty,” Robotica 40(8), 2748–2764 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, J., Liu, X., Wang, Y. and Wang, Y., “Design and motion mechanism analysis of screw-driven in-pipe inspection robot based on novel adapting mechanism,” Robotica 42(4), 1297–1319 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, V. J. E., Schwarzl, C. and Martin, H.. “Evaluation of an indoor localization system for a mobile robot,” In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), IEEE (2019) pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Farahsari, P. S., Farahzadi, A., Rezazadeh, J. and Bagheri, A., “A survey on indoor positioning systems for iot-based applications,” IEEE Internet Things J. 9(10), 7680–7699 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Darabi, H., Banerjee, P. and Liu, J., “Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 37(6), 1067–1080 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yassin, A., Nasser, Y., Awad, M., Al-Dubai, A., Liu, R., Yuen, C., Raulefs, R. and Aboutanios, E., “Recent advances in indoor localization: A survey on theoretical approaches and applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19(2), 1327–1346 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tlili, F., Hamdi, N. and Belghith, A.. “Accurate 3d localization scheme based on active rfid tags for indoor environment, In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on RFID-Technologies and Applications (RFID-TA), IEEE (2012) pp. 378–382.Google Scholar
Tong, X., Wang, H., Liu, X. and Qu, W., “Mapfi: Autonomous mapping of wi-fi infrastructure for indoor localization,” IEEE T. on Mobile Comput. 22(3), 1566–1580 (2021).Google Scholar
Yubin, X., Weilin, J. and Xuejun, S., “Toa Estimate Algorithm Based Uwb Location,” In 2009 International Forum On Information Technology and Applications. vol. 1 IEEE, (2009) pp. 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, J. J. and Durrant-Whyte, H. F., “Simultaneous Map Building and Localization for an Autonomous Mobile Robot, In: Proceedings IROS ’91:IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems ’91, vol. 3, (1991) pp. 1442–1447.Google Scholar
Chen, X. and Gao, Z.. “Indoor ultrasonic positioning system of mobile robot based on tdoa ranging and improved trilateral algorithm, In: 2017 2nd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC) 2017, IEEE (2017) 923–927. Google Scholar
Geng, C., Yuan, X. and Huang, H., “Exploiting channel correlations for NLOS ToA localization with multivariate gaussian mixture models,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 9(1), 70–73 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdollahzadeh, M., Amiri, R. and Behnia, F., “Optimal sensor placement for multi-source aoa localisation with distance-dependent noise model,” IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation 13(6), 881–891 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S., Dong, Y., Wang, H., Wang, S., Zhang, Y. and He, B., “Bifocal-binocular visual slam system for repetitive large-scale environments,” IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 71, 1–15 (2022).Google Scholar
Guo, S., Rong, Z., Wang, S. and Wu, Y., “A lidar slam with pca-based feature extraction and two-stage matching,” IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 71, 1–11 (2022).Google Scholar
Nuaimi, K. A. and Kamel, H.. “A survey of indoor positioning systems and algorithms, In: 2011 international conference on innovations in information technology, IEEE (2011) pp. 185–190.Google Scholar
Amundson, I. and Koutsoukos, X. D., “A Survey On Localization for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks,” In: Mobile Entity Localization and Tracking in GPS-less Environnments: Second International Workshop, MELT. 2009, Springer, Orlando, FL, USA, (2009) pp. 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P. and Piché, R., “A survey of selected indoor positioning methods for smartphones,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19(2), 1347–1370 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, A. F. G. G., Fernandes, D. M. A., Catarino, A. P. and Monteiro, J. L., “Localization and positioning systems for emergency responders: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19(4), 2836–2870 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafari, F., Gkelias, A. and Leung, K. K., “A survey of indoor localization systems and technologies,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(3), 2568–2599 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obeidat, H., Shuaieb, W., Obeidat, O. and Abd-Alhameed, R., “A review of indoor localization techniques and wireless technologies,” Wirel. Pers. Commun. 119(1), 289–327 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Mai, X., Ho, D., Liu, T., Li, C., Pan, J. and Meng, M. Q.-H., “Coarse-to-fine visual object catching strategy applied in autonomous airport baggage trolley collection,” IEEE Sens. J. 21(10), 11844–11857 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. and Meng, M. Q.-H., “Real-time decision making and path planning for robotic autonomous luggage trolley collection at airports,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber.: Syst. 52(2022) 2174–2183.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Chi, W., Li, C., Wang, C. and Meng, M. Q.-H., “Neural rrt*: Learning-based optimal path planning,” IEEE T. Autom. Sci. Eng. 17(4), 1748–1758 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Z., Lei, B., Xie, P., Liu, F., Gao, J., Zhang, Y. and Wang, J., “Multi-risk-rrt: An efficient motion planning algorithm for robotic autonomous luggage trolley collection at airports,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 9(2), 3450–3463 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, A., Luan, H., Zhao, Z., Hong, Y., Zhao, J., Chen, W., Wang, J. and Meng, M. Q.-H.. Robotic autonomous trolley collection with progressive perception and nonlinear model predictive control, In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), (2022) pp. 4480–4486.Google Scholar
Xie, P., Xia, B., Hu, A., Zhao, Z., Meng, L., Sun, Z., Gao, X., Wang, J. and Meng, M. Q.-H., “Autonomous multiple-trolley collection system with nonholonomic robots: Design, control, and implementation,” J. Field Robot (2024).Google Scholar
Lepetit, V., Moreno-Noguer, F. and Fua, P., “Ep n p: An accurate o (n) solution to the p n p problem,” Int. J. Comput. Vision 81(2), 155–166 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamano, K., Tanaka, K., Hirayama, M., Kondo, E., Kimuro, Y. and Matsumoto, M., “Self-Localization of Mobile Robots with Rfid System by Using Support Vector Machine,” In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference On Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE Cat. Mo. 04CH37566), vol. 4 IEEE, (2004) pp. 3756–3761.Google Scholar
Sanpechuda, T. and Kovavisaruch, L.. A review of rfid localization: Applications and techniques, In: 2008 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, 2 (2008) 769–772.Google Scholar
Tesoriero, R., Gallud, J. A., Lozano, M. and Penichet, V. M. R., “Using active and passive rfid technology to support indoor location-aware systems,” IEEE T. Consum. Electr. 54(2), 578–583 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Tian, G. and Shao, X., “Safe and efficient robot manipulation: Task-oriented environment modeling and object pose estimation,” IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–12 (2021).Google Scholar
Zhu, M., Derpanis, K. G., Yang, Y., Brahmbhatt, S., Zhang, M., Phillips, C., Lecce, M. and Daniilidis, K.. Single image 3d object detection and pose estimation for grasping, In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE (2014) pp. 3936–3943.Google Scholar
Cheng, J., Liu, P., Zhang, Q., Ma, H., Wang, F. and Zhang, J., “Real-time and efficient 6-d pose estimation from a single rgb image,” IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–14 (2021).Google Scholar
Cao, Z., Liu, R., Yuen, C., Athukorala, A., Ng, B. K. K., Mathanraj, M. and Tan, U.-X.. Relative localization of mobile robots with multiple ultra-wideband ranging measurements; In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), (2021) pp. 5857–5863.Google Scholar
Fishberg, A. and How, J. P.. Multi-agent relative pose estimation with uwb and constrained communications, In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), (2022) pp. 778–785.Google Scholar
Yu, J., Shen, A., Luo, X. and Xiao, T.. Robot localization using laser positioning of reflectors based on icp, In: 2021, 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), (2021) pp. 3145–3149.Google Scholar
Na, S., Xumin, L. and Yong, G.. Research on k-means clustering algorithm: An improved k-means clustering algorithm, In: 2010 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology and Security Informatics, (2010) pp. 63–67.Google Scholar
Zafari, F., Papapanagiotou, I. and Christidis, K., “Microlocation for internet-of-things-equipped smart buildings,” IEEE Internet Things 3(1), 96–112 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar