Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T20:15:57.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Female Loa loa worm polyinfection in human hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2025

Jeanne A. Rajaonarivelo*
Affiliation:
TransVIHMI, University of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, Montpellier, France
Cédric Mariac
Affiliation:
DIADE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier, France
Philippe Cubry
Affiliation:
DIADE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier, France
Nora Lardal
Affiliation:
TransVIHMI, University of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, Montpellier, France
Cédric B. Chesnais
Affiliation:
TransVIHMI, University of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, Montpellier, France
Jérémy T. Campillo
Affiliation:
TransVIHMI, University of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, Montpellier, France
Michel Boussinesq
Affiliation:
TransVIHMI, University of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, Montpellier, France
François Sabot
Affiliation:
DIADE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier, France
Sébastien D. S. Pion
Affiliation:
TransVIHMI, University of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, Montpellier, France
*
Corresponding author: Jeanne A. Rajaonarivelo; Email: rajaonaryline@gmail.com

Abstract

Loiasis is widespread in Central Africa. Some acute symptoms are associated with high Loa loa microfilaraemia, but the relation between the latter and the adult worm burden infecting an individual with loiasis is still unclear. This study aims to determine whether polyinfection by several reproductive female worms could be assessed using genetic variation in the mitochondrial genome of microfilariae. Microfilariae were collected from the individuals' blood. An optimization of the DNA extraction method that provides enough genetic material and minimization of human host contamination was the first step of the study. Extracted DNA was sequenced using the Illumina platform. Genetic variation in the mitochondrial genome was assessed by identifying polymorphic Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and estimating the number of haplotypes. Dedicated DNA extraction kits yielded more DNA extracted (mean: 530 ng; SD = 211) from dried blood smears than the in-house chloroform-isoamyl method (mean: 102.5 ng; SD = 118). Filtering the slide elution and venous blood with 5 µm pore size microfilters improved parasite DNA mapping rates (54.64–79.65%). Analysis of polymorphism in the microfilariae mitochondrial genome from three individuals revealed 50, 207 and 332 polymorphic SNPs, respectively. A total of 7 to 20 mitochondrial DNA haplotypes were identified, representing the minimum number of fertile female worms. This study presents the first approach to estimating the L. loa female worm burden and highlights female parent polyinfection in individuals with loiasis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Observation of L. loa microfilariae on May-Grünwald Giemsa stained smear (A) and after dissolution of the blood film (B) under light microscope Zeiss Axio Zoom v.16 (magnification × 100).

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison of yield and quality of DNA extracted from dried blood smears using two different protocols

Figure 2

Table 2. Efficiency of microfilariae L. loa enrichment as a function of microfilter pore size

Figure 3

Table 3. L. loa whole genome variant statistics

Figure 4

Figure 2. Rarefaction curves showing the number of mitochondrial haplotypes detected as a function of sequencing depth across six mitochondrial genes.

Figure 5

Table 4. Number of microfilariae L. loa mitochondrial haplotypes estimated per individual in polymorphic regions located in six genes

Supplementary material: File

Rajaonarivelo et al. supplementary material

Rajaonarivelo et al. supplementary material
Download Rajaonarivelo et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.1 KB