Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g4pgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T20:07:27.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Operational and conceptual confusion in life history research necessitates the two-tiered model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2025

Heather Maria Maranges*
Affiliation:
Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA maranges@psy.fsu.edu timbs@psy.fsu.edu
Casey Lee Timbs
Affiliation:
Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA maranges@psy.fsu.edu timbs@psy.fsu.edu
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Our systematic analysis of operationalizations and conceptualizations of harshness (extrinsic mortality) and unpredictability in the (psychology) life history literature highlights that (1) employment of extremely diverse measures contributes to the confusion about the effect of harshness on life history traits and (2) few measures reflect energetic stress or ambient EM, such that Ellis et al.’s two-tiered model should motivate future research.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable