Figurative language is (implicitly) more dynamic and emotionally deeper than literal language – CORRIGENDUM

Tshering Yangzom Dorji; Frank H. Durgin

doi:10.1017/langcog.2026.10079

Figurative language is (implicitly) more dynamic and emotionally deeper than literal language – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2026

Tshering Yangzom Dorji and

Frank H. Durgin

Article contents

Abstract
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type: Corrigendum
Information: Language and Cognition , Volume 18 , 2026 , e28

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2026.10079 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright: © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press

An author’s name was incorrectly spelled in the article as originally published (Tshering Yanzom Dorji). This has been corrected to Tshering Yangzom Dorji in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

The corresponding author apologises for the error.

References

Dorji, T. Y., & Durgin, F. H. (2025) Figurative language is (implicitly) more dynamic and emotionally deeper than literal language. Language and Cognition, 17, e56. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2025.10010CrossRef Google Scholar