Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-2r2wp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-24T09:30:23.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parasite community structure of Sardina pilchardus in the Black Sea: diversity, host factors and seasonal dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2026

Arzu Güven*
Affiliation:
Department of Aquaculture, Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi, Malatya, Türkiye
Türkay Öztürk
Affiliation:
Aquaculture and Disease, Sinop Universitesi, Sinop, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: Arzu Güven; Email: arzu.guven@ozal.edu.tr

Abstract

Content of image described in text.

The parasite fauna of Sardina pilchardus from the Black Sea coast of Türkiye was investigated. The parasitological survey was conducted on a total of 136 fish collected monthly from October 2024 to May 2025. A total of 7 parasite species were recovered: 5 digeneans (comprising 3 adult stages and 2 metacercarial stages), 1 larval nematode and 1 coccidian. The identified taxa included the adult digeneans Pronoprymna ventricosa, Lecithaster confusus and Aphanurus stossichii, metacercariae Stephanostomum sp. and Renicola sp., nematode Hysterothylacium aduncum, and coccidian Eimeria sardinae. Prevalence (%) and infection intensity indices were determined for each parasite species. Overall infection prevalence (82.35%), mean intensity (8.28 ± 0.74) and mean abundance (6.82 ± 0.67) were calculated. Infection parameters for each parasite species were determined and statistically compared across fish length groups, seasons, sex and host body condition factor. The results revealed that parasite abundance and intensity varied significantly among fish length groups and seasons, whereas no significant correlations were found with host body condition or fish sex. Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to examine co-occurrence patterns among parasite species. A moderate positive correlation was detected between H. aduncum and Stephanostomum sp. (r = 0.494, P < 0.01). In contrast, associations among other parasite species were weak or negligible, indicating largely independent occurrence. Except for H. aduncum, all identified species represent new host records for this species in the Black Sea and Türkiye. Notably, Renicola sp. constitutes the first record of this genus for the parasite fauna of Türkiye.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1. List of the parasite species detected in Sardina pilchardus in this study and their occurrences documented in different regionsTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Table 2. Prevalence and infection metrics of parasites in Sardina pilchardus (N = 136)Table 2 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 1. (A–D) Species accumulation curves showing parasite species richness in Sardina pilchardus: (A) total samples, (B) length groups and (C) seasons and (D) sexes. Curves were generated using randomized permutations (N = 136) and represent mean cumulative richness (±s.d.).Figure 1 long description.

Figure 3

Table 3. Parasite community metrics by sexes, length group and seasons in Sardina pilchardusTable 3 long description.

Figure 4

Table 4. Prevalence (P%), mean intensity (MI ± s.e.) and mean abundance (MA ± s.e.) of parasite species in S. pilchardus according to 5 length groupsTable 4 long description.

Figure 5

Table 5. Prevalence (P%), mean intensity (MI ± s.e.) and mean abundance (MA ± s.e.) of parasite species in Sardina pilchardus according to seasonsTable 5 long description.

Figure 6

Table 6. Prevalence (P%), mean intensity (MI ± s.e.) and mean abundance (MA ± s.e.) of parasite species in Sardina pilchardus from Türkiye according to sexTable 6 long description.

Figure 7

Figure 2. The relationship between total parasite abundance (log10-transformed) and fish body condition (Fulton’s K) in Sardina pilchardus was statistically non-significant (Pearson’s r;P > 0.05).

Figure 8

Figure 3. Co-occurrence matrix of parasite species detected in Sardina pilchardus, illustrating ecological associations among 6 parasite taxa. Each cell represents the interaction between a pair of species, catagorised positive (dark blue), weak positive (blue-green), random (light green) or negative (very light shading).Figure 3 long description.