Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-rxg44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T17:28:18.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Many behavioral tendencies associated with right-leaning (conservative) political ideologies are malleable and unrelated to negativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Christopher Y. Olivola  and
Abigail B. Sussman
Christopher Y. Olivola
Affiliation:
Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. olivola@cmu.edu https://sites.google.com/site/chrisolivola/
Abigail B. Sussman
Affiliation:
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637. asussman@chicagobooth.edu http://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/directory/s/abigail-sussman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research has identified several judgment and decision making tendencies associated with right-leaning political ideologies that are difficult (if not impossible) to explain in terms of stable, negative affective appraisals because they (1) are uncorrelated with the negativity of the stimuli being considered, (2) do not reflect divergent affective evaluations, and (3) can be eliminated by superficial manipulations and interventions.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 323 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J. & Weber, E. U. (2010) A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science 21(1):86–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, M. A. (2011) The politics of purchasing: Ethical consumerism, civic engagement, and political participation in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., Carranza, E. & Fox, C. R. (2008) Mistaken identity: Activating conservative political identities induces “conservative” financial decisions. Psychological Science 19(11):1154–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, B. J. & Bartels, B. L. (2011) Politics at the checkout line: Explaining political consumerism in the United States. Political Research Quarterly 64(4):803–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivola, C. Y., Sussman, A. B., Tsetsos, K., Kang, O. E. & Todorov, A. (2012) Republicans prefer Republican-looking leaders: Political facial stereotypes predict candidate electoral success among right-leaning voters. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(5):605–13.Google Scholar
Olivola, C. Y. & Todorov, A. (2010) Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 34(2):83–110.Google Scholar
Sussman, A. B. & Olivola, C. Y. (2011) Axe the tax: Taxes are disliked more than equivalent costs. Journal of Marketing Research 48:S91–S101.Google Scholar