Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T10:21:22.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associative learning alone is insufficient for the evolution and maintenance of the human mirror neuron system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Lindsay M. Oberman
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, and Division of Cognitive Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215. loberman@bidmc.harvard.edu http://www.tmslab.org
Edward M. Hubbard
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Psychology and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705. emhubbard@wisc.edu http://website.education.wisc.edu/edneurolab
Joseph P. McCleery
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom. j.p.mccleery@bham.ac.uk http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/psychology/mcCleery-joe.aspx

Abstract

Cook et al. argue that mirror neurons originate from associative learning processes, without evolutionary influence from social-cognitive mechanisms. We disagree with this claim and present arguments based upon cross-species comparisons, EEG findings, and developmental neuroscience that the evolution of mirror neurons is most likely driven simultaneously and interactively by evolutionarily adaptive psychological mechanisms and lower-level biological mechanisms that support them.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable