Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-ntvhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T15:37:30.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnitude, numerosity, and development of number: Implications for mathematics disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2017

Nancy C. Jordan
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 njordan@udel.edu luke.rinne@g.mail.com https://sites.google.com/a/udel.edu/nancy-jordan/
Luke Rinne
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 njordan@udel.edu luke.rinne@g.mail.com https://sites.google.com/a/udel.edu/nancy-jordan/
Ilyse M. Resnick
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Penn State University–Lehigh Valley, Center Valley, PA 18034 imr9@psu.edu

Abstract

Leibovich et al. challenge the prevailing view that non-symbolic number sense (e.g., sensing number the same way one might sense color) is innate, that detection of numerosity is distinct from detection of continuous magnitude. In the present commentary, the authors' viewpoint is discussed in light of the integrative theory of numerical development along with implications for understanding mathematics disabilities.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable