Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-23T08:19:49.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Episodic memory and the witness trump card

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2018

Jeremy Henry
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130. jeremy.henry@wustl.edu ccraver@wustl.edu https://pages.wustl.edu/cfcraver
Carl Craver
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130. jeremy.henry@wustl.edu ccraver@wustl.edu https://pages.wustl.edu/cfcraver

Abstract

We accept Mahr & Csibra's (M&C's) causal claim that episodic memory provides humans with the means for evaluating the veracity of reports about non-occurrent events. We reject their evolutionary argument that this is the proper function of episodic memory. We explore three intriguing implications of the causal claim, for cognitive neuropsychology, comparative psychology, and philosophy.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable