Creativity Has No Dark Side

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761225.002

2 - Creativity Has No Dark Side

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Edited by

James C. Kaufman and

Mark A. Runco: Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Athens
David H. Cropley: Affiliation:
University of South Australia
Arthur J. Cropley: Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
California State University at San Bernardino
Mark A. Runco: Affiliation:
University of Georgia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Creativity does not have a dark side. Creative products and efforts can be malevolent, but that is apparent in their impact and is not an inherent quality of creativity nor a requisite trait in the creative personality. Claiming that there is a dark side to creativity is much like arguing that hammers are evil because they can be used to dismantle as well as construct things. Creativity is indeed in some ways a tool of humanity, but of course that is merely a metaphor and, as such, only imperfectly applicable. The important point is that the process that underlies all creative things is not moral or immoral, ethical or unethical, good or evil. It is essentially blind. Like a tool, it can be applied in many different ways, some of which are benevolent and some of which are unethical and immoral, but to understand creativity it is best to be parsimonious and leave out what is extraneous, and that includes all possible effects. This chapter develops this view of parsimonious creativity and describes the ostensible dark side as a function of values and decisions that are ancillary to actual creative work.

There is no denying that creative talents have in the past been used in highly unfortunate ways. Many famous examples of this have been described by McLaren (1993), Stein (1993), and the authors of others chapters in this volume.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Dark Side of Creativity , pp. 15 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761225.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aries, P. (1973). Centuries of childhood. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1993). Controlled weirdness. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 182–184.CrossRef Google Scholar

Becker, G. (1999). Mad genius. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Benedict, R. (1989/1934). Patterns of culture. New York: Mariner Books.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (2002/1946). The creative mind. New York: Citadel.Google Scholar

Bower, R. (1999). Dangerous minds: Eminently creative people who have spent time in jail. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 3–13.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruner, J. 1962. The conditions of creativity. In J. Bruner (Ed.), On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dollinger, S., Burke, P A., & Gump, N. W. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 91–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1991). Bully for Brontosaurus. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Gruber, H. E. (1993). Creativity in the moral domain: Ought implies can implies create. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 3–15.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS/Knapp.Google Scholar

Gutbezahl, J. & Averill, R. J. (1996). Individual differences in emotional creativity as manifested in words and pictures. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 327–337.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, K., Runco, M. A., Dorinan, C., & Freeland, D. C. (1997). Influential factors in artists' lives and themes in their art work. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 221–228.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311–366.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A. & Greenberger, E. (2007). Values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 105–122.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1987). The development of moral judgment and moral action. In L. Kohlberg (Ed.), Child psychology and childhood education: A cognitive developmental view. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lemons, G. (2005). When the horse drinks: Enhancing everyday creativity using elements of improvisation. Creativity Research Journal,17, 25–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lord, M. G. (2007). A look at Wernher von Braun, patriarch of U.S. rocketry, Nazi past and all. Review of Von Braun: Dreamer of Space, Engineer of War, by Michael J. Neufeld. Los Angeles Times Book Review. Available at www.latimes.com/features/books/la-bk-lord23sep23,0,4789920.story?coll= la-books-headlines; accessed September 23, 2007.

Lumsden, C. J. & Findlay, S. C. (1988). Evolution of the creative mind. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 75–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1973). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In A. Rothenberg and C. R. Hausman (Eds.), The creative question (pp. 86–92). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Maugh, T. H. (2009). Venus figurine sheds light on origins of art by early humans. Los Angeles Times Science. Available at www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la–sci–venus14–2009may14,0,181830.story. Accessed on May 14, 2009.

Mednick, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 222–232.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McLaren, R. B. (1993). The dark side of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 137–144.CrossRef Google Scholar

Milgram, R. M. & Rabkin, L. (1980). Developmental test of Mednick's associative hierarchies of original thinking. Developmental Psychology, 16, 157–158.CrossRef Google Scholar

Norlander, T., Nordmarker, A., & Archer, T. (1998). Effects of alcohol and frustration on experimental graffiti. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 201–207.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nordmarker, A., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2000). The effects of alcohol intake and induced frustration upon art vandalism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 15–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: Afterview for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300–326.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rickards, T. & deCock, C. (in press). Understanding organizational creativity: Towards a multiparadigmatic approach. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (vol. 2). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Rogers, C. R. (1954/1959). Toward a theory of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 69–82). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, E. & Winner, E. (1988). The art of children's drawings. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22, 3–15.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rothenberg, A. 1990. Creativity, mental health, and alcoholism. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 179–201.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1988). Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 1–7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1989). Parents' and teachers' ratings of the creativity of children. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 73–83.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1993). Moral creativity: Intentional and unconventional. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 17–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1994). Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 272–290). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1995). Insight for creativity, expression for impact. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 377–390.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1996). Creativity and development: Recommendations. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 87–90.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Education, 47, 317–324.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2007). A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 1–9.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2010). Parsimonious creativity and its measurement. In E. Villalba (Ed.), Measuring creativity: Proceedings of European Council meeting on creativity and innovation (pp. 393–405). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (In press-a). Divergent and creative thinking. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Runco, M. A. (in press-b). Divergent thinking. In Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (In press). Creativity research: A history. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of creativity research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Runco, M.A. & Basadur, M. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2, 166–173.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Johnson, D., & Gaynor, J. R. (1997). The judgmental bases of creativity and implications for the study of gifted youth. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski–Kubilius (Eds.), Creativity in youth: Research and methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Kaufman, J. C., Halladay, L. R., & Cole, J. C. (in press). Change in reputation as index of genius and eminence. Historical Methods.

Runco, M. A. & Shaw, M. P. (1994). Conclusions concerning creativity and affect. In M. P. Shaw & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity and affect (pp. 261–270). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295–302.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. & Vega, L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children's ideas. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 439–452.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2008). The creative process in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 329–344.Google Scholar

Spooner, M. T. (2008). Commentary on malevolent creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 128–129.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stein, M. I. (1993). Moral issues facing intermediaries between creators and the public. Creativity Research Journal, 6. 197–200.CrossRef Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly?Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Tweney, R. D. (1996). Presymbolic processes in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 163–172.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.