Remarks

The subphylum Blastozoa contains at present ten classes. Since Chauvel (Reference Chauvel1941), many authors considered that the class Eocrinoidea “includes a heterogeneous assemblage of species whose only similarity is that they lack the autapomorphic characteristics of the other, less ambiguously defined, cystoid [blastozoan] groups” (Smith, Reference Smith1984, p. 439). Eocrinoids are mostly defined as basal blastozoans (brachiole-bearing echinoderms) having an irregular plated body wall (with imbricate or tessellate plating), with or without epispires, and an irregularly multiplated stalk or a holomeric stem (Ubaghs, Reference Ubaghs1968; Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973; Broadhead, Reference Broadhead1982; Paul and Smith, Reference Paul and Smith1984). “The diagnoses [of the class Eocrinoidea] are so broad that they essentially define those blastozoans that are not clearly assignable, by default, to a cystoid or blastoid group” (Parsley and Zhao, Reference Parsley and Zhao2006, p. 1063). Therefore, the class Eocrinoidea, which corresponds to a paraphyletic assemblage, is not considered here as a valid taxonomic entity, and basal-most blastozoans are not assigned to any existing class.

Family Lepidocystoidae Durham, Reference Durham1968

Figure 2

Figure 2

Photographs of selected specimens representing the Family Lepidocystoidae Durham, Reference Durham1968. (1) Holotype MCZ 581 of Kinzercystis durhami Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973 (Kinzers Formation, Pennsylvania) showing the circular oral disc, composed of large adjacent plates bearing roundish epispires and bearing the periproct laterally, overlapping the conical aboral cup; (2) plesiotype MCZ 588A of Lepidocystis wanneri Foerste, Reference Foerste1938 (Kinzers Formation, Pennsylvania) showing narrow oral surface composed of small platelets bearing small epispires and damaged periproct, few brachioles attached to the ambulacra; (3, 4) specimens of Vyscystis ubaghsi Fatka and Kordule, Reference Fatka and Kordule1990 for comparison (Jince Formation, Příbram-Jince Basin, Czech Republic); (3) partial small specimen NML28665 showing long imbricate plates and adjacent plates pierced by small roundish epispires, embedded ambulacral flooring plates bearing brachiole facets; (4) holotype NML 28664, showing disarticulated imbricate plates and epispire-bearing adjacent plates with five coiled brachioles. Latex casts have been whitened with ammonium chloride. Scale bars=5 mm.

Diagnosis

‘Calyx-bearing’ blastozoans. Oral disc made of numerous adjacent plates, with simple sutural pores along their sutures; anal pyramid, hydropore-gonopore located in the ‘CD’ interradius in the oral disc. Ambulacral system confined to oral disc, consisting of a central, covered mouth, several radially arranged ambulacral grooves embedded into the oral surface, and numerous straight or coiled biserial brachioles alternately arranged alongside each ambulacral groove. Aboral cup cone-shaped or elongated into a cylindrical stalk, and composed of numerous imbricate plates.

Remarks

This family, based on the genus Lepidocystis Foerste, Reference Foerste1938, was initially assigned to an independent class (Lepidocystoidea Durham, Reference Durham1968). Durham (Reference Durham1968) differentiated lepidocystoids from eocrinoids on three main features: (1) the restriction of the epispires-bearing surface to the oral surface, (2) the imbricate plating on the aboral region, and (3) the circlet of ‘free arms’ (brachioles) on the oral surface and their mode of attachment. With the description of a second genus (Kinzercystis Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973), Sprinkle (Reference Sprinkle1973) suggested that these differences were not supported by the new discoveries and not sufficiently grounded to maintain the class Lepidocystoidea. Accordingly, he decided to assign lepidocystoids to the new order Imbricata, within the class Eocrinoidea, and to synonymize the class Lepidocystoidea with the new order Imbricata. Sprinkle (Reference Sprinkle1973) interpreted lepidocystoids as eocrinoids because of the presence of both brachioles and sutural pores and the similar morphology of their attachment disc (holdfast). He diagnosed the order Imbricata on the basis of the well-marked differentiation between the tessellate plating of the oral surface and the imbricate plating of the aboral region (Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973, p. 60). However, several other echinoderms exhibit a comparable combination of imbricate and tessellate platings (e.g., Camptostroma Ruedemann, Reference Ruedemann1933; several edrioasteroids, primitive solutans). The discovery of Felbabkacystis n. gen. confirms that the order Imbricata Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973 was mostly described on plesiomorphic characters (e.g., imbricate plating, sutural pores). Therefore, the order Imbricata is not considered here as a valid taxonomic entity, and the family Lepidocystoidae, with a diagnosis emended from Durham (Reference Durham1968), is retained as a basal blastozoan family. Lepidocystoids possess one single apomorphy of the subphylum (presence of brachioles), but they lack all other apomorphies present in more advanced taxa (e.g., theca, spout-like oral area, holomeric stem). The particular morphology of the lepidocystoids recalls the bipartite body-wall organization (disc-like oral surface and elongate aboral cup; Fig. 2) also occurring in other primitive echinoderms (camptostromatoids, basal crinoids, edrioasteroids, etc.). The body wall of the lepidocystoids is therefore called here a ‘calyx’ by comparison to the structure observed in many other basal echinoderms (see Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, Lefebvre, David and Mooi2009 for further discussion).

The family Lepidocystoidae contains the three closely related genera Lepidocystis and Kinzercystis (both from the Cambrian Stage 4 Kinzers Formation of Pennsylvania, USA) and Vyscystis Fatka and Kordule, Reference Fatka and Kordule1990 (from the Drumian Jince Formation of Czech Republic).

Family Felbabkacystidae new family

Type genus

Felbabkacystis new genus

Diagnosis

As for type species by monotypy.

Remarks

The presence of brachioles supports the assignment of felbabkacystids to the subphylum Blastozoa. The combination of plesiomorphic (e.g., imbricate plating, sutural pores) and derived characters (vaulted oral surface, tessellate region extended beyond the body wall edge, elongate epispires, lateral location of the periproct) is not present among members of the family Lepidocystoidae (Fig. 2). It therefore justifies the erection of a new family, which occupies a relatively basal position within blastozoans (see the following for an extended explanation). Felbabkacystids differ from lepidocystoids by: (1) the higher ratio between tessellate/imbricate regions of the body wall, associated with the overgrowth of the tessellate region not only restricted to the oral disc; and (2) the strongly indented shape of the plates, the length of the epispires, and the location of the periproct high in the lateral tessellate area (Figs. 3, 4). They share with lepidocystoids the presence of an elongate aboral region (cup and stalk) made of imbricate elements.

Figure 3

(1.1, 2.1, 3.1) Photographs of latex casts whitened with ammonium chloride and (1.2, 2.2, 3.2) the corresponding camera lucida drawings of selected specimens of Felbabkacystis luckae n. gen. n. sp. (Jince Formation, Příbram-Jince Basin, Czech Republic). (1) Internal view of a selected paratype on the slab SZ343 showing slightly disarticulated brachioles at the top of the narrow vaulted tessellate region, and the anal structure; (2) internal view of the holotype SZ349 showing straight brachioles grouped on flooring plates in the narrow oral zone; (3) external view of the paratype MI2 showing the clear transition between the tessellate and imbricate parts of the body wall and the long aboral appendage with imbricate plating. Scale bars=5 mm.

Figure 4

(1–5) Photographs of selected specimens of Felbabkacystis luckae n. gen. n. sp. (Jince Formation, Příbram-Jince Basin, Czech Republic). (1) Paratype slab SZ343 showing aggregated specimens showing articulated thecae bearing brachioles and/or proximal stalk; (2) partially preserved paratype SZ347 associated with one autochthonous ctenocystoid echinoderm; (3) badly preserved paratype SZ346 associated with one large specimen of Lichenoides priscus Barrande, Reference Barrande1846; (4) partial specimen LK1 showing the transition between the aboral imbricate and the adoral tessellate regions of the body wall, possible peristomial organization at the top with few disarticulated brachioles; (5) disarticulated specimen LK2, showing brachioles restricted to the top of the tessellate region, composed of large star-shaped granulated plates; co-occurring with partial specimen of Vyscystis ubaghsi Fatka and Kordule, Reference Fatka and Kordule1990, showing small polygonal plates forming the oral surface and bearing small roundish epispires, crushed on the aboral imbricate body wall. Scale bars=5 mm.

Genus Felbabkacystis new genus

Figures 3–5

Figure 5

(1, 2) Photographs of two specimens of Felbabkacystis luckae n. gen. n. sp. (Jince Formation, Příbram-Jince Basin, Czech Republic). (1) Internal view showing the location of the periproct in the lateral body wall in the paratype SZ343; (2) details on the subvective system restricted in the narrow oral area of the holotype SZ349. (3) Enlargement on the oral surface of the small specimen NML28665 of Vyscystis ubaghsi Fatka and Kordule, Reference Fatka and Kordule1990 (Jince Formation, Příbram-Jince Basin, Czech Republic) showing the periproct border laterally to the oral disc and the relatively long embedded ambulacrum bearing brachiole facets. Colors indicate the different skeleton regions according to the extraxial-axial theory framework (Mooi and David, Reference Mooi and David1998; Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, Lefebvre, David and Mooi2009; Lefebvre et al., Reference Lefebvre, Nardin and Fatka2015). Latex casts have been whitened with ammonium chloride. Scale bars=1 mm.

Type species

Felbabkacystis luckae n. gen. n. sp.

Diagnosis

As for type species by monotypy.

Etymology

From the village Felbabka in Czech Republic (type locality).

Felbabkacystis luckae new species

Figures 3–5

2004 n. gen. n. sp., Reference Fatka, Kordule and SzabadFatka et al., p. 379.

2015 Undescribed transitional form, n. gen., n. sp., Reference Lefebvre, Nardin and FatkaLefebvre et al., p. 89, fig. 1B.

2015 Imbricate eocrinoid, Reference Nohejlová and FatkaNohejlová and Fatka, p. 119, fig. 2D

Holotype

SZ349, complete body wall and articulated brachioles.

Diagnosis

Blastozoans with a cylindrical to fusiform body wall. Part of the lateral body wall, made of numerous adjacent plates, with large elliptic simple sutural pores along their sutures. Ambulacral system confined to body-wall summit, consisting of a central mouth, several radially arranged ambulacral grooves embedded into the oral surface, and straight biserial brachioles, each mounted on two ambulacral flooring plates. Aboral region exclusively composed of numerous imbricate plates, overlapping adorally; proximal part (cup) forming the aboral part of the body wall; distal part (stalk-like extension of the cup) elongate and forming a relatively long and narrow, cylindrical attachment structure.

Occurrence

Jince Formation, Drumian; slope called Jince-Vinice locality, Czech Republic.

Description

Skeleton of Felbabkacystis luckae n. sp. consisting of large fusiform bipartite body wall with both tessellate (upper) and imbricate (lower) plated regions, long cylindrical stalk forming its aboral end, and oral surface bearing both ambulacral system and brachioles (Figs. 3–5).

Stalk-like body-wall extension relatively long (>66 mm in length) and cylindrical (1.6 ± 0.2 mm in diameter); at least three times the length of the body capsule (Fig. 3.3). Plates being adorally imbricated, ~40% of their height exposed; not ornamented, as long as wide, but shorter than plates of the tessellate part. Transition between stalk and imbricate part of the body wall marked by diameter and plate size increase. No attachment disc or holdfast observed at the distal end of best-preserved stalk, as well as in other specimens.

Body capsule cylindrical to fusiform, height around three times width; its length varying from 14 mm to 32 mm, and its width from 4 mm to 10 mm; divided into two distinct aboral, imbricate, and adoral, tessellate regions. Aboral part of the test conical, expanding in diameter from the stalk to its lower part (Figs. 3.2, 3.3, 4.2); width regularly increasing from the base to the upper part of the test. Adoral tessellate part (L=8.2–22.2 mm, W=5.8–8.1 mm) ~1.8 times length and ~1.3 times width of imbricate one (L=5.8–10.0 mm, W=4.5–6.7 mm). All specimens showing approximately the same proportions for the two regions. Imbricate part of the test with length 1.5 times width, composed of numerous, scalar plates, slightly overlapping adorally (about 60% exposed), small and squamous, longer than high, thin (0.08 mm on average), constant in size from the base to the top of that part; organized in circlets (Fig. 3.3); slightly domed, without any respiratory structures, smooth on their exterior and interior surfaces. Connection between the two parts of the body wall consisting of one or two circlets of straightened-up imbricate-type plates without epispires (Figs. 3.2, 4.4). Tessellate part of the body wall region with length 1.5 to 2.1 times width, constituted by numerous large adjacent plates, polygonal in shape, possibly organized into poorly defined circlets aborally and with no apparent organization in the oral region (Figs. 4.3, 5.1, 5.2). Interior surface of the plates smooth; exterior surface slightly granular. Adjacent plates twice as thick as imbricate ones (0.15 mm), flat to slightly domed, depending on the number of epispires. One to three simple epispires occurring on each plate side; deeply excavated into adjacent plates, forming elongate peripores (Fig. 4.1); elliptical and large only at the suture margins, probably uncovered. Periporal edges thin and short. Periproct opening in the first adoral third of the tessellate part of the body wall (Fig. 3.1).

Oral surface relatively narrow, composed of few adjacent plates, each bearing only a few small epispires (Fig. 3.2). Plates irregularly pentagonal to hexagonal in shape. Oral area not sufficiently well preserved to show complete ambulacral system. Straight and thin (0.7 mm in diameter) brachioles probably originating at the border of peristomial area, at least six in number, being mounted on two large, domed plates with no epispires, interpreted as ambulacral flooring plates (Fig. 5.1, 5.2). Brachiolar plates pentagonal, unornamented, domed, and alternating in a biserial pattern. Few plates covering brachiolar food grooves proximally observed; their presence over the entire length of the brachioles being highly probable, due to the presence of two slits occurring on interior edge of brachiolar plates. At present, no hydropore and gonopore observed in any specimen.

Etymology

From Lucka, daughter of the third author.

Material

Holotype, SZ349, complete body wall and articulated brachioles. Best paratype, MI2, complete body wall and long stalk. Other figured paratypes SZ343 (slab with several specimens), SZ346-347, SZ349, LK1, and LK2 (slab with one specimen of Vyscystis); five additional unfigured partial specimens, some with preserved stalk attached to the body wall and proximal parts of brachioles.

Remarks

Felbabkacystis n. gen. differs from all lepidocystoids and gogiid eocrinoids described so far. The occurrence of the lepidocystoid Vyscystis in the same level and same locality as Felbabkacystis could question the validity of the new genus and suggest that putative differences in morphology may simply result from differences in ontogeny and/or in preservation: individuals assigned to these two taxa are sometimes found associated, on a same slab (Fig. 4.5). However, in recent years, the discovery of several new, well-preserved specimens of Vyscystis shows that their morphology is clearly distinct from that of Felbabkacystis (Table 1; Figs. 2.3, 2.4, 4.5, 5). Main differences between the two genera concern: (1) the morphology of the brachioles (straight in F. luckae, spiraled in V. ubaghsi); (2) the extension of ambulacra (short and restricted to the summit of the vaulted oral area in F. luckae); (3) the morphology of the oral surface (strongly vaulted in Felbabkacystis, almost flat in Vyscystis); (4) the extension of the tessellate part of the body wall (restricted to the apical part of the test in V. ubaghsi, more extensive and forming the upper two-thirds of the lateral walls in F. luckae); (5) the morphology of tessellate thecal plates (they are large, granulated, star-shaped, with incurved edges in F. luckae, but small, polygonal, smooth, and flat in V. ubaghsi); (6) the morphology of epispires (elongate and V-shaped in F. luckae, consistently small and roundish in Vyscystis at all growth stages); and (7) the extension of the imbricate, stalk-like appendage (long and cylindrical in Felbabkacystis, apparently short and wide in Vyscystis).

Table 1

Comparison of the morphological characters of selected lepidocystoids and eocrinids genera with Felbabkacystis n. gen. Refer to the Supplementary Data S1 for the sources of the description.

Felbabkacystis differs from Lepidocystis by having thinner brachioles, larger plates, and wider epispires in a more extended tessellate region and narrower ornamented plates in the imbricate region (Fig. 2.2; Table 1; Foerste, Reference Foerste1938; Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973). Comparison with Kinzercystis shows that Felbabkacystis has larger epispires over a more contracted oral area, and a fusiform tessellate plating area (Fig. 2.1; Table 1; Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973). Felbabkacystis contrasts with the coeval eocrinoids (Akadocrinus Prokop, Reference Prokop1962; Lichenoides Barrande, Reference Barrande1846) in its bipartite body wall and the imbricate plating of its aboral cup and the stalk-like appendage, and the possession of thin, large star-shaped adjacent plates (Table 1; Fig. 6). It resembles some co-occurring gogiid eocrinoids by possessing elongate elliptical epispires (as in Lichenoides) and short isotomous ambulacra (as in Akadocrinus).

Figure 6

Sketch indicating the homology and relative body regions in selected Cambrian echinoderms, according to the extraxial-axial theory framework (Mooi and David, Reference Mooi and David1998; Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, Lefebvre, David and Mooi2009; Lefebvre et al., Reference Lefebvre, Nardin and Fatka2015).

The absence of identified gonopore in Felbabkacystis does not allow documenting the degree of maturity of observed specimens. All Felbabkacystis specimens are homogeneous in size and in the relative proportions of the tessellate and imbricate regions of the body wall. This suggests that all specimens were probably at similar ontogenetic stage.

Phylogenetic results

The peculiar morphology of Felbabkacystis n. gen. allows interpreting the relationships and the evolutionary history within the early blastozoan genera (lepidocystoids, coeval eocrinids, and later eocrinoids), using Stromatocystites Pompeckj, Reference Pompeckj1896 as an outgroup (Appendix, Supplementary Data S1). Primary homologies have been identified independently among the three morphological modules (aboral region, body wall, and feeding system; Table 1, Appendix), whereas mechanistic homologies were used to describe the organization of each module, independently from any terminological influence (David et al., Reference David, Lefebvre, Mooi and Parsley2000; Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, Lefebvre, David and Mooi2009; Zamora et al., Reference Zamora, Rahman and Smith2012; Zamora and Rahman, Reference Zamora and Rahman2014).

Phylogenetic analysis of the 13 characters scored for 13 taxa found nine equally parsimonious cladograms (see Appendix for further details). The majority-rule consensus of these trees places Felbakbacystis n. gen. near the base of the blastozoans, more derived than the lepidocystoids and as a sister-group of the two crownward clades: the gogiids and the later eocrinoids (Fig. 7). Among the blastozoans, the basal lepidocystoids are characterized by the plesiomorphic features of having both imbricate and tessellate platings on their test in addition to slender brachioles born by five embedded ambulacra and epispires at the plate margins in the tessellate region (Fig. 2, Table 1).

Figure 7

Geological time framework of the majority-rule consensus of nine equally parsimonious trees (L=27 steps, CI=0.741, RI=0.800, RC=0.593), showing the idealized morphology of the genera included in the analysis. Bootstrap and Bremer support values are to the left and to the right side of each node, respectively. Drawings to scale. Abbreviations: Drum.=Drumian; Gu.=Guzhangian; Pai.=Paibian; Jiang.=Jiangshanian; Laws.=Lawsonian.

Felbabkacystis n. gen. is considered as a sister-taxon of the second clade (Fig. 7). It shares similarities with that of various eocrinoids (Table 1), such as: (1) the presence of an overgrown tessellate vaulted region, forming the theca in all eocrinid genera and further derived blastozoans; (2) larger adjacent plates (e.g., Sinoeocrinus Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Huang and Gong1994, Trachelocrinus Ulrich, Reference Ulrich1929); (3) shorter ambulacra embedded into the apical area (e.g., Gogia Walcott, Reference Walcott1917); (4) isotomous ambulacral pattern leading to the clustering of the brachioles at the edge of the oral surface (e.g., Gogia, Sinoeocrinus); and (5) elongate epispires (e.g., Lichenoides) (Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973). It still retains some plesiomorphies, shared with Lepidocystis (e.g., presence of a long imbricate stalk and a relatively narrow tessellate oral surface), and with Kinzercystis and Vyscystis, (e.g., comparable size and organization of imbricate cup plates; Table 1). Felbabkacystids differ from lepidocystoids by: (1) the relative proportions of the tessellate and imbricate regions of the body wall, (2) the length and shape of the epispires and the resulting plate shape, and (3) the location of the periproct in the lateral tessellate area.

The first crownward cluster is composed of the eocrinids, except Lyracystis, which are only united on the heteromorphous polyplating of the aboral stalk-like appendage and the possession of a relatively organized theca (Fig. 7). The presence of numerous plesiomorphies (e.g., heteromorphous polyplated stalk, holotomous biserial long ambulacra, periproct located in the oral disc, etc.) might explain the basal position of Lyracystis regarding the other eocrinids. Their paraphyly is sustained by the location of the periproct and the organization of the ambulacral system, showing various degrees of derivation (e.g., convergent recumbency or erection of the ambulacra, symmetry). The association of Ubaghsicystis Gil Cid and Domínguez-Alonso, Reference Gil Cid and Domínguez-Alonso2002 to this cluster is supported by the plesiomorphies of the theca. The second crownward cluster is composed of the most derived genera (Ridersia Jell et al., Reference Jell, Burett and Banks1985, Trachelocrinus), in addition to the lichenoid Lichenoides. This clade prefigures the typical morphology of later blastozoans, with a holomeric or atrophied stem, a more regularly plated theca, heterogeneous oral surface organization, and a strong variability in the ambulacral system (Fig. 7).

Evolutionary trends

The globular, elongate test of Felbabkacystis luckae n. gen. n. sp. shows a clear differentiation into two well-separated regions (Fig. 3). The lower (aboral) region of the test without any body opening and its stalk-like extension, which contain no main body orifice or any ambulacral (axial) element, are both probably made of imperforate extraxial plates (cf. Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, Lefebvre, David and Mooi2009; Lefebvre et al., Reference Lefebvre, Nardin and Fatka2015). Consequently, it is very likely that these two regions, which display the same imbricate pavement and are in physical continuity with each other, are all together equivalent to the aboral cup of Stromatocystites and of the lepidocystoids, and to the stalk or the (developed to atrophied) column of the other blastozoans, even if some do not show an imbricate plating (Figs. 5–7). The upper two-thirds of the test of Felbabkacystis is entirely made of adjacent plates bearing respiratory structures and pierced by the main body openings (anus, mouth) (Fig. 5.1, 5.2). The oral surface of Stromatocystites and lepidocystoids, the aboral tessellate part of the felbabkacystid test, and the entire theca of the later blastozoans are interpreted as made of perforate extraxial skeleton (Figs. 5, 7) because of the presence of the primary openings (David et al., Reference David, Lefebvre, Mooi and Parsley2000; Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, Lefebvre, David and Mooi2009; Lefebvre et al., Reference Lefebvre, Nardin and Fatka2015). Therefore, the degree of stretching of the tessellate region in the felbabkacystids is unique within blastozoans. The test, called prototheca sensu Lefebvre et al. (Reference Lefebvre, Nardin and Fatka2015), is interpreted as representing a transitional form between calyx-bearing primitive blastozoans (lepidocystoids) and more advanced, theca-bearing blastozoans (Fig. 6). The recently described bipartite test of the Cambrian Helicocystis Smith and Zamora, Reference Smith and Zamora2013 has been similarly interpreted as transitional between the helicoplacoids and the more derived pentaradial forms (Smith and Zamora, Reference Smith and Zamora2013).

Within early blastozoans, the progressive replacement of imbricate aboral stalk-like appendages (plesiomorphic condition) by tessellate ones has often been considered as a major evolutionary trend (Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973, Reference Sprinkle1981; Ubaghs, Reference Ubaghs1968, Reference Ubaghs1975; Broadhead, Reference Broadhead1982). The morphology of Felbabkacystis n. gen. not only confirms this trend, but also illustrates the transition between lepidocystoids and eocrinids (Figs. 6, 7). Those and/or further observations may support the phylogenetic significance of the nature of aboral plating (imbricate vs. tessellate) in blastozoans or even within the early echinoderms. This trend is associated with the progressive increase (Fig. 7) in regularity of the multiplated eocrinid stalks (e.g., Gogia, Sinoeocrinus) and with the convergent transition toward holomeric columns in several blastozoans (e.g., Akadocrinus vs. Ridersia, Trachelocrinus), as suggested by Sprinkle (Reference Sprinkle1973).

The presence of a narrow, vaulted oral region leading to the restriction of the ambulacral system at the summit of the body wall in Felbabkacystis n. gen. is a derived but probably convergent feature (Figs. 5–7). Similar domed or spout-like organizations occur in several Cambrian eocrinoids (e.g., Trachelocrinus), as well as in many younger and more derived blastozoans (e.g., Bockia Hecker, Reference Hecker1938, Heliocrinites Eichwald, Reference Eichwald1840). The grouped arrangement of exothecal feeding appendages (brachioles) at the end of the ambulacral ray or as lateral branches of the ambulacral ray reflects convergences among blastozoans (e.g., Aristocystites Barrande, Reference Barrande1887 , Felbabkacystis n. gen., Gogia, Palaeosphaeronites Prokop, Reference Prokop1964 vs. Eumorphocystis Branson and Peck, Reference Branson and Peck1940 , Kinzercystis, Macrocystella Callaway, Reference Callaway1877 , Trachelocrinus).

The trait set of Felbabkacystis n. gen. appears as fundamentally transitional between the lepidocystoids and the eocrinids, combining both apomorphies (e.g., partially overgrown tessellate region, large epispires, vaulted oral area, roundish lateral periproct) and plesiomorphic features (e.g., imbricate stalk-like appendage) of the blastozoans (Fig. 7). Such atypical morphology reinforces the unity of the blastozoans on the possession of brachioles as appendages disconnected from the body wall cavity, clearly contrasting from arms as outgrowth of the body wall (Ubaghs, Reference Ubaghs1968, Reference Ubaghs1975; Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973; David et al., Reference David, Lefebvre, Mooi and Parsley2000; but see Zamora and Smith, Reference Zamora and Smith2012 for an alternative interpretation). It emphasizes the strong but natural variability affecting the ambulacra-oral surface plate patterns (embedded, recumbent, erect, or nonmineralized ambulacral flooring plates, see Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, Lefebvre, David and Mooi2009) and the ambulacral grooves branching and their associated structures plating (Nardin et al., Reference Nardin, David, Lefebvre and Mooi2010).

The stratigraphic scaling of the phylogenetic hypothesis supports the concept of a rapid early blastozoan diversification (Guensburg and Sprinkle, Reference Guensburg and Sprinkle1992; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Zamora and Álvaro2013). Major homologies defining the derived blastozoans as well as the more basal blastozoan clades seem to appear in the fossil record before the Drumian (Fig. 7). However, the morphological characters defining the clades suggest an asynchronous development of various versions of plesiomorphic and apomorphic trait sets, as well as strong convergences in the evolution of the plating of the aboral region (as suggested by Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973) and of the ambulacral architecture (as proposed by Zamora and Smith, Reference Zamora and Smith2012).