Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T10:53:41.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why they shared: recovering early arguments for sharing social scientific data – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2021

Emily Hauptmann
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Data sharingUniversity of MichiganInstitute for Social Research (ISR)Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)Angus CampbellWarren Millersocial science historypolitical science, erratum

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
Science in Context , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 187
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Cambridge University Press would like to apologise for the following error in above article (Hauptmann, Reference Hauptmann2020).

The paragraph at the end of page 102 should have read:

The second example comes from long-time staff member Erik Austin’s recent account of the early years of ICPR. According to Austin, the prevailing attitude towards data sharing in the midtwentieth century was an unfavorable mix of hostility and incomprehension.

“Scientific data from all disciplines were jealously guarded by their developers/creators as private resources …’’

References

Hauptmann, E. 2020. “Why they shared: recovering early arguments for sharing social scientific data”. Science in Context. 33, 101–119 10.1017/S0269889720000204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed