Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T05:38:46.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soya protein ameliorates the metabolic abnormalities of dysfunctional adipose tissue of dyslipidaemic rats fed a sucrose-rich diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2010

María E. Oliva
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242 (3000), Santa Fe, Argentina
Dante Selenscig
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242 (3000), Santa Fe, Argentina
María E. D'Alessandro
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242 (3000), Santa Fe, Argentina
Adriana Chicco
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242 (3000), Santa Fe, Argentina
Yolanda B. Lombardo*
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242 (3000), Santa Fe, Argentina
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Y. B. Lombardo, fax +54 42 4575211, email ylombard@fbcb.unl.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigates whether the replacement of dietary casein by soya protein isolate could be able to improve and/or even revert the morphological and metabolic abnormalities underlying the adipose tissue dysfunction of dyslipidaemic rats chronically fed (8 months) a sucrose-rich (62·5 %) diet (SRD). For this purpose, Wistar rats were fed a SRD for 4 months. From months 4 to 8, half the animals continued with the SRD and the other half were fed a SRD in which the source of protein, casein, was substituted by soya. The control group received a diet in which the source of carbohydrate was maize starch. Compared with the SRD-fed group, the results showed that: (1) soya protein decreased body-weight gain, limited the accretion of visceral adiposity and decreased adipose tissue cell volume without changes in total cell number; (2) soya protein increased the protein mass expression of PPARγ, which was significantly reduced in the fat pad of the SRD-fed rats; (3) the activity of the enzymes involved in the de novo lipogenesis of adipose tissue was significantly decreased/normalised; (4) soya protein corrected the inhibitory effect of SRD upon the anti-lipolytic action of insulin, reduced basal lipolysis and normalised the protein mass expression of GLUT-4. Dyslipidaemia, glucose homeostasis and plasma leptin levels returned to control values. The present study provides data showing the beneficial effects of soya protein to improve and/or revert the adipose tissue dysfunction of a dyslipidaemic insulin-resistant rat model and suggests that soya could maintain the functionality of the adipose tissue–liver axis improving/reverting lipotoxicity.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets (based on the AIN-93 diet)

Figure 1

Table 2 Body-weight gain, energy intake, carcass weight and composition, adipose tissue cellularity and plasma metabolites and insulin levels of rats fed on a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or the SRD with soya protein (SRD-S)‡(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 2

Table 3 Epididymal fat pad weight, leptin contents and plasma leptin levels in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or the SRD with soya protein (SRD-S)‡(Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 3

Table 4 Lipogenic enzyme and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activities in adipose tissue of rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or the SRD with soya protein (SRD-S)§(Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 4

Table 5 Basal lipolysis and insulin-mediated inhibition of lipolysis in isolated adipocytes from epididymal fat tissue or rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or the SRD with soya protein (SRD-S)‡(Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 5

Fig. 1 Fat pad protein mass expression of PPARγ of rats fed a control diet (CD, ■), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD, ) or the SRD with soya protein (SRD-S, □). (a) Immunoblots of PPARγ of adipose tissue from the CD, SRD and SRD-S rats. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, skeletal muscle tissue as a positive control; lane 2, CD; lane 3, SRD; lane 4, SRD-S. (b) Densitometric immunoblot analysis of PPARγ protein mass in adipose tissue of rats fed a CD, SRD or SRD-S. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars (six animals per group), and expressed as percentage relative to the CD. ** Mean values were significantly different from those of the CD and SRD-S (P < 0·01). † Mean values were significantly different from those of the CD (P < 0·05).

Figure 6

Fig. 2 Fat pad protein mass expression of GLUT-4 at the start (0 min □) and under the insulin stimulation at the end (120 min ) of the clamp studies in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or the SRD with soya protein (SRD-S). (a) Immunoblot of GLUT-4 of adipose tissue from the CD, SRD and SRD-S. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD 0 min; lane 2, CD 120 min; lane 3, SRD 0 min; lane 4, SRD 120 min; lane 5, SRD-S 0 min; lane 6, SRD-S 120 min. (b) Densitometric immunoblot analysis of GLUT-4 protein mass in adipose tissue of rats fed a CD, SRD or SRD-S at the start and at the end of clamp studies. Values are means, with their standard errors depicted by vertical bars (six animals per group), and expressed as percentage relative to the control diet at 0 min of the clamp. * Mean values were significantly different from those of the SRD rats at 120 min of the clamp v. CD and SRD-S rats at 120 min of the clamp (P < 0·05). † Mean values were significantly different from those of the CD and SRD-S rats at 120 min of the clamp v. CD and SRD-S rats at 0 min of the clamp (P < 0·05).