Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-21T08:53:53.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociocultural dimensions of early dual language learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2022

Fred Genesee Open the ORCID record for Fred Genesee [Opens in a new window]
Fred Genesee*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Monreal, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Titone and Tiv's Systems Theory of Bilingualism aims to “urge cognitive scientists and neuroscientists to better embrace sociolinguistic and sociocultural experiences as part of their theoretical and empirical purview”. No stronger case for such a framework can be found than in studies of developmental aspects of bilingualism. In fact, inclusion of sociocultural variation has been a common feature of many studies of dual language learning for some time, especially in studies of pre-school and early-school-age learners (see Genesee, 2019, for a review). Young dual language learners – neonates, infants and toddlers, exposed to more than one language – begin life as virtual tabula rasa and are capable of learning any language with facility. As a result, their language acquisition is necessarily tied to the sociocultural parameters of the learning environments they are exposed to. Moreover, as Titone and Tiv emphasize, the immediate and ultimate purpose of language learning is communication. Thus, young dual language learners must be attuned to and acquire the sociocultural constraints and norms for communicating effectively in more than one language. While sociocultural variation is important for understanding language acquisition even among monolingual children living in relatively homogeneous monocultural environments, sociocultural variation is inherent and, indeed, enhanced in the learning environments of children acquiring more than one language insofar as each language is intimately linked with different socio-cultural parameters. Sociocultural variation can be important for understanding bilingualism in yet another way. In studies of the neuro-cognitive consequences of bilingualism, it has been reported that there is a more pronounced association between dual language exposure and activation of certain brain areas among adolescent bilinguals from relatively low SES backgrounds than bilinguals from relatively high SES backgrounds (Brito & Noble, 2018). Inclusion of sociocultural variation in research on the effects of bilingualism can reveal a more nuanced view than emerges if such variation is not considered.

Keywords

childhood bilingualismbilingual acquisition

Information

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 33 - 35
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brito, NH and Noble, KG (2018) The independent and interacting effects of socioeconomic status and dual-language use on brain structure and cognition. Developmental Sciences 21(6), e12688, doi: 10.1111/desc.12688Google ScholarPubMed
Byers-Heinlein, K, Burns, TC and Werker, JF (2010) The roots of bilingualism in newborns. Psychological Science 21(3), 343–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeCasper, AJ and Fifer, WP (1980) Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science 208, 1174–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genesee, F (2019) Language development in simultaneous bilinguals: The early years. In von Koss Torkildsen, J and Horst, J (eds), International Handbook on Language Development. London: Routledge, pp. 300–320.Google Scholar
Genesee, F (in press) The monolingual bias: A critical analysis. International Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education.Google Scholar
Genesee, F, Nicoladis, E and Paradis, J (1995) Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of child language 22, 611–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, SF (2017) Tracking ethnicity-language co-occurrence among ten-month-old bilinguals. Unpublished MAThesis, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Psychology), University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Lanza, E (1997) Language mixing in infant bilingualism: A sociolinguistic perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, WF (1939–49). Speech development of a bilingual child: A linguist's record (4 vols). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
May, L, Gervain, J, Carreiras, M and Werker, JF (2018) The specificity of the neural response to speech at birth. Developmental Sciences 21(3), e12564, doi: 10.1111/desc.12564.Google ScholarPubMed
Moon, C, Cooper, JP and Fifer, WP (1993) Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development 16, 495–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, DK and Eilers, RE (2002) Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J, Crago, M and Genesee, F (2006) Domain-general versus domain-specific accounts of specific language impairment: Evidence from bilingual children's acquisition of object pronouns. Language Acquisition 13(1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Leroux, AT, Pirvulescu, M and Roberge, Y (2009) Bilingualism as a window into the language faculty: The acquisition of objects in French-speaking children in bilingual and monolingual contexts. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(01), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramon-Casas, M, Swingley, D, Sebastián-Gallés, N and Bosch, L (2009) Vowel categorization during word recognition in bilingual toddlers. Cognitive psychology 59(1), 96–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, L, Tan, A. R. Y., Lee, K and Quinn, PC (2020) Sensitivity to race in language comprehension in monolingual and bilingual infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 199, 104933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithson, L, Paradis, J and Nicoladis, E (2014) Bilingualism and receptive vocabulary achievement: Could sociocultural context make a difference? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(4), 810–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uttley, L, de Boisferon, AH, Dupierrix, E, Lee, K, Quinn, PC, Slater, AM and Pascalis, O (2013) Six-month-old infants match other-race faces with a non-native language. International Journal of Behavioral Development 37(2), 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V and Taeschner, T (1978) The acquisition and development of language by bilingual children. Journal of child language 5(02), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherhead, D, Kandhadai, P, Hall, DG and Werker, JF (2021) Putting mutual exclusivity in context: Speaker race influences monolingual and bilingual infants’ word-learning assumptions. Child Development 92(5), 1735–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed