Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-13T01:56:32.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analogues of Auslander–Yorke theorems for multi-sensitivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

WEN HUANG ,
SERGIĬ KOLYADA  and
GUOHUA ZHANG
WEN HUANG
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China email wenh@mail.ustc.edu.cn
SERGIĬ KOLYADA
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, NASU, Tereshchenkivs’ka 3, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine email skolyada@imath.kiev.ua
GUOHUA ZHANG
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences and LMNS, Fudan University and Shanghai Center for Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai 200433, China email chiaths.zhang@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study multi-sensitivity and thick sensitivity for continuous surjective selfmaps on compact metric spaces. Our main result states that a minimal system is either multi-sensitive or an almost one-to-one extension of its maximal equicontinuous factor. This is an analog of the Auslander–Yorke dichotomy theorem: a minimal system is either sensitive or equicontinuous. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of a syndetically equicontinuous point, and we prove that a transitive system is either thickly sensitive or contains syndetically equicontinuous points, which is a refinement of another well-known result of Akin, Auslander and Berg.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 651 - 665
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akin, E.. Recurrence in Topological Dynamics. The University Series in Mathematics. Plenum Press, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
Akin, E., Auslander, J. and Berg, K.. When is a transitive map chaotic? Convergence in Ergodic Theory and Probability (Columbus, OH, 1993) (Ohio State University. Math. Res. Inst. Publ., 5) . de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
Akin, E. and Glasner, E.. Residual properties and almost equicontinuity. J. Anal. Math. 84 (2001), 243–286.Google Scholar
Akin, E. and Kolyada, S.. Li–Yorke sensitivity. Nonlinearity 16(4) (2003), 1421–1433.Google Scholar
Auslander, J.. Minimal flows and their extensions. Notas de Matemática [Mathematical Notes], 122 (North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 153) . North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
Auslander, J. and Yorke, J. A.. Interval maps, factors of maps, and chaos. Tôhoku Math. J. (2) 32(2) (1980), 177–188.Google Scholar
Blanchard, F., Host, B. and Maass, A.. Topological complexity. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20(3) (2000), 641–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochner, S.. Curvature and Betti numbers in real and complex vector bundles. Univ. e Politec. Torino. Rend. Sem. Mat. 15 (1955–56), 225–253.Google Scholar
Bochner, S.. A new approach to almost periodicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 48 (1962), 2039–2043.Google Scholar
Downarowicz, T.. Survey of odometers and Toeplitz flows. Algebraic and Topological Dynamics (Contemporary Mathematics, 385) . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005, pp. 7–37.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. and Gottschalk, W. H.. Homomorphisms of transformation groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1960), 258–271.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, H.. Recurrence in Ergodic Theory and Combinatorial Number Theory (M. B. Porter Lectures) . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.Google Scholar
Glasner, E.. A simple characterization of the set of 𝜇-entropy pairs and applications. Israel J. Math. 102 (1997), 13–27.Google Scholar
Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Nonlinearity 6(6) (1993), 1067–1075.Google Scholar
Guckenheimer, J.. Sensitive dependence to initial conditions for one-dimensional maps. Comm. Math. Phys. 70(2) (1979), 133–160.Google Scholar
Huang, W., Khilko, D., Kolyada, S. and Zhang, G.. Dynamical compactness and sensitivity. J. Differential Equations 260(9) (2016), 6800–6827.Google Scholar
Huang, W. and Ye, X.. Devaney’s chaos or 2-scattering implies Li–Yorke’s chaos. Topol. Appl. 117(3) (2002), 259–272.Google Scholar
Kolyada, S. and Snoha, L.. Some aspects of topological transitivity—a survey. Iteration Theory (ECIT 94) (Opava) (Grazer Mathematische Berichte, 334) . Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Graz, 1997, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
Kolyada, S., Snoha, L. and Trofimchuk, S.. Noninvertible minimal maps. Fund. Math. 168(2) (2001), 141–163.Google Scholar
Li, J. and Ye, X.. Recent development of chaos theory in topological dynamics. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 32(1) (2016), 83–114.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Liao, L. and Wang, L.. Thickly syndetical sensitivity of topological dynamical system. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. (2014), art. ID 583431, 4.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Dynamical systems with turbulent behavior. Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics (Proc. Int. Conf., University of Rome, Rome, 1977) (Lecture Notes in Physics, 80) . Springer, Berlin–New York, 1978, pp. 341–360.Google Scholar
Subrahmonian Moothathu, T. K.. Stronger forms of sensitivity for dynamical systems. Nonlinearity 20(9) (2007), 2115–2126.Google Scholar
Veech, W. A.. Almost automorphic functions on groups. Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 719–751.Google Scholar
Veech, W. A.. The equicontinuous structure relation for minimal Abelian transformation groups. Amer. J. Math. 90 (1968), 723–732.Google Scholar
Veech, W. A.. Topological dynamics. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83(5) (1977), 775–830.Google Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 79) . Springer, New York–Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
Ye, X. and Yu, T.. Sensitivity, proximal extension and higher order almost automorphy. Preprint, 2016,arXiv:1605.01119.Google Scholar