Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T14:15:59.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitutional Origins and Liberal Democracy: A Global Analysis, 1900–2015

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2021

GABRIEL L. NEGRETTO Open the ORCID record for GABRIEL L. NEGRETTO [Opens in a new window]  and
MARIANO SÁNCHEZ-TALANQUER Open the ORCID record for MARIANO SÁNCHEZ-TALANQUER [Opens in a new window]
GABRIEL L. NEGRETTO*
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
MARIANO SÁNCHEZ-TALANQUER*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
*
Gabriel L. Negretto, Associate Professor, Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, gabriel.negretto@uc.cl.
Mariano Sánchez-Talanquer, Academy Scholar, Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies, Harvard University, mariano.sanchez@colmex.mx.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A strong tradition in democratic theory claims that only constitutions made with direct popular involvement can establish or deepen democracy. Against this view, we argue that new constitutions are likely to enhance liberal democracy when they emerge through a plural agreement among political elites with distinct bases of social support. Power dispersion during constitution writing induces the adoption of institutions that protect opposition forces from the arbitrary use of executive power without unduly impairing majority rule. However, since incumbents may renege on the bargain, the democratizing effect of politically plural constitutional agreements is likely to be larger in the short term, when the identity of negotiating political forces and the balance of power between them tend to remain stable. We find support for these arguments using an original global dataset on the origins of constitutions between 1900 and 2015 and a difference-in-differences design.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 522 - 536
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The authors’ names are in alphabetical order. We wish to thank Ernesto Calvo, Robert Fishman, Diego Gil, Jonathan Hartlyn, Bernardo Lara, Juan Pablo Luna, Julio Ríos-Figueroa, Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca, Francisco Urbina, Francisco Urdinez, Georg Vanberg, Sophie Weerts, Oya Yegen, and three anonymous reviewers. We are also grateful to seminar participants at the Carlos III Juan March Institute, the Political Science Department at Sabanci University, the Institute of Political Science at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, and the Division of Political Studies at the Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE). The Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (Chile) funded part of the research for this article through the grant FONDECYT Regular No. 1200060. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FLV8GQ.

References

REFERENCES

Alberts, Susan, Warshaw, Chris, and Weingast, Barry. 2012. “Democratization and Countermajoritarian Institutions: Power and Constitutional Design in Self-Enforcing Democracy.” In Comparative Constitutional Design, ed. Ginsburg, Tom, 69–100. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor. 2018. Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew. 2016. Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy, and Yashar, Deborah J., eds. 2016. Parties, Movements and Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Duflo, Esther, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, Miller, Michael, and Rosato, Sebastian. 2013. “A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1523–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Svolik, Milan. 2013. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Michele, Cottrell, Jill, Ghai, Yash, and Regan, Anthony. 2011. Constitution-Making and Reform: Options for the Process. Geneva: Interpeace.Google Scholar
Carey, John. 2009. “Does It Matter How a Constitution Is Created?” In Is Democracy Exportable? ed. Barany, Zoltan D. and Moser, Robert G., 155–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colon-Rios, Joel. 2012. Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Lindberg, Staffan I., Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, et al. 2019. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset 2018–Dataset Version 9 [computer file]. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project [producers]. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd A., LeVan, A. Carl, and Maboudi, Tofigh. 2015. “When Talk Trumps Text: The Democratizing Effects of Deliberation during Constitution-Making, 1974–2011.” American Political Science Review 109 (3): 592–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd A., LeVan, A. Carl, and Maboudi, Tofigh. 2017. Constituents before Assembly: Participation, Deliberation, and Representation in the Crafting of New Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd A., and Maboudi, Tofigh. 2019. “Being There Is Half the Battle: Group Inclusion, Constitution-Writing, and Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (13–14): 2135–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. 2017. Comparative Constitutions Project. Urbana–Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2013. Securities against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, James. 2011. “Deliberative Democracy and Constitutions.” Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1): 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Elkins, Zachary, and Blount, Justin. 2009. “Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter?” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5 (1): 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz. 2018. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Benjamin A. T., Miller, Michael K., and Strøm, Kaare W.. 2017. “Safeguarding Democracy: Powersharing and Democratic Survival.” American Political Science Review 111 (4): 686–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higley, John, and Burton, Michael. 2006. Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. 2013. Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Courtney, and Shapiro, Ian. 1995. “South Africa’s Negotiated Transition: Democracy, Opposition, and the New Constitutional Order.” Politics & Society 23 (3): 269–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas. 2005. “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power.” Constellations 12 (2): 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. 2004. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, Gurr, Ted, and Jaggers, Keith. 2019. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018. College Park, MD: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel. 2017. “Constitution-Making in Comparative Perspective.” Chap. 2 in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. Thompson, William. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” The Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. [1791] 1995. “Rights of Man.” In Paine: Collected Writings, 433–540. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Partlett, William. 2012. “The Dangers of Popular Constitution-Making.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 38 (1): 193–238.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1988. “Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts.” Chap. 2 in Constitutionalism and Democracy, eds. Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, Philip, and Ohls, David. 2018. “Self-Enforcing Power Sharing in Weak States.” International Organization 72 (2): 423–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2 (3): 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saati, Abrak. 2015. “The Participation Myth: Outcomes of Participatory Constitution Building Processes on Democracy.” PhD diss. Umeå University.Google Scholar
Saati, Abrak. 2017. “Constitution-Building Bodies and the Sequencing of Public Participation: A Comparison of Seven Empirical Cases.” Journal of Politics and Law 10 (3): 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2008. Constitutional Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. “Mass Mobilization and Elite Exchange: Democratization Episodes in Italy and Spain.” Democratization 2 (3): 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Stephen. 2012. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2016. Measures of Democracy 1810–2014 [computer file] (FSD1289). Version 7.0 (2014-01-31). Tatu Vanhanen & Krister Lundell [producers]. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor], 201.Google Scholar
Voigt, Stephan. 2004. “The Consequences of Popular Participation in Constitutional Choice: Towards a Comparative Analysis.” In Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory, and Deliberative Democracy, eds. van Aaken, Anne, List, Christian, and Lütge, Christoph, 199–229. Hants: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, Jonathan, and Mendez, Fernando, eds. 2013. Patterns of Constitutional Design: The Role of Citizens and Elites in Constitution-Making. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Widner, Jennifer. 2008. “Constitution Writing in Post-Conflict Settings: An Overview.” William & Mary Law Review 49 (4): 1513.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Negretto and Sánchez-Talanquer Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FLV8GQ
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Negretto and Sánchez-Talanquer supplementary material

Negretto and Sánchez-Talanquer supplementary material
Download Negretto and Sánchez-Talanquer supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 458.5 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.