Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T05:55:51.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysing real-world visual search tasks helps explain what the functional visual field is, and what its neural mechanisms are

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2017

John Campion
John Campion*
Affiliation:
30A London Road, Liphook, Hants GU30 7AN, United Kingdom. tj.campion@btinternet.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rejecting information-processing-based theory permits the merging of a top-down analysis of visual search tasks with a bottom-up analysis of brain structure and function. This reveals the true nature of the functional visual field and its precise role in the conduct of visual search tasks. The merits of such analyses over the traditional methods of the authors are described.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e133
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albert, M. C. (1973) A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 23:658–64.Google Scholar
Berti, A. & Rizzolatti, G. (2002) Coding near and far space. In: The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect, ed. Karnath, H., Milner, D. & Vallar, G., pp. 119–29. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campion, J. (1987) Apperceptive agnosia: The specification and description of constructs. In: Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach, ed. Humphreys, G. W. & Riddoch, M. J., pp. 197–232. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Campion, J. (1989) Interfacing the laboratory with the real world: A cognitive approach to colour assignment in visual displays. In: Cognitive ergonomics and human-computer interaction, ed. Long, J. & Whitefield, A., pp. 35–65. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campion, J. (2009) Consciousness: Paradigm for a science of real minds and brains with special reference to vision. SOTU Press.Google Scholar
Campion, J. (2011) Consciousness as a paradigm for cognitive neuroscience. History and Philosophy of Psychology 13(2):24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, J. (2014) De-inventing the wheel: How information processing destroyed the science of vision. Paper presented at the History and Philosophy of Psychology Society's Annual Conference, April 15, Guildford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Campion, J., Latto, R. & Smith, Y. M. (1983) Is blindsight an effect of scattered light, spared cortex and near threshold vision? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:423–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, B., Klein, G. & Hoffman, R. (2006) Working minds: A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Karnath, H., Milner, D. & Vallar, G. (2002) The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1966) Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Palmer, S. E. (1999) Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sirigu, A., Daprati, E., Pradat-Diehl, P., Franck, N. & Jeannerod, M. (1999) Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain 122:1867–74.Google Scholar