Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T23:09:15.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The pregnancy compensation hypothesis, not the staying alive theory, accounts for disparate autoimmune functioning of women around the world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Erin M. O'Mara Kunz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA ekunz1@udayton.edu jgoodnight1@udayton.edu https://sites.google.com/udayton.edu/erinomarakunz
Jackson A. Goodnight
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA ekunz1@udayton.edu jgoodnight1@udayton.edu https://sites.google.com/udayton.edu/erinomarakunz
Melissa A. Wilson
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA mwilsons@asu.edu www.sexchrlab.org

Abstract

The pregnancy compensation hypothesis provides a mechanistic explanation for the evolution of sex differences in immune system functioning, the excess of women experiencing autoimmune disease, and why this is observed only in industrialized nations; none of which can be explained by the staying alive theory, as proposed by the authors of the target article.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable