Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T11:29:33.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adherence to cancer prevention recommendations and antioxidant and inflammatory status in premenopausal women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Yukiko Morimoto
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
Fanchon Beckford
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
Robert V. Cooney
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
Adrian A. Franke
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
Gertraud Maskarinec*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
*
* Corresponding author: Dr G. Maskarinec, fax +1 808 586 2982, email gertraud@cc.hawaii.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For cancer prevention, the World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) emphasise recommendations to improve individual behaviour, including avoidance of tobacco products, maintaining a lean body mass, participating in physical activity, consuming a plant-based diet, and minimising the consumption of energy-dense foods, such as sodas, red and processed meats and alcohol. In the present study of 275 healthy premenopausal women, we explored the association of adherence scores with levels of three biomarkers of antioxidant and inflammation status: serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum γ-tocopherol and urinary F2-isoprostane. The statistical analysis applied linear regression across categories of adherence to WCRF/AICR recommendations. Overall, seventy-two women were classified as low ( ≤ 4), 150 as moderate (5–6), and fifty-three as high adherers ( ≥ 7). The unadjusted means for CRP were 2·7, 2·0 and 1·7 mg/l for low, moderate and high adherers (P trend= 0·03); this association was strengthened after adjustment for confounders (P trend= 0·006). The respective values for serum γ-tocopherol were 1·97, 1·63 and 1·45 μg/ml (P trend= 0·02 before and P trend= 0·03 after adjustment). Only for urinary F2-isoprostane, the lower values in high adherers (16·0, 14·5, and 13·3 ng/ml) did not reach statistical significance (P trend= 0·18). In an analysis by BMI, overweight and obese women had higher biomarker levels than normal weight women; the trend was significant for CRP (P trend< 0·001) and γ-tocopherol (P trend= 0·003) but not for F2-isoprostane (P trend= 0·14). These findings suggest that both adherence to the WCRF/AICR guidelines and normal BMI status are associated with lower levels of biomarkers that indicate oxidative stress and inflammation.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Flow chart for recruitment and study population of the Breast, Estrogen, and Nutrition 1 (BEAN1) Study (a) and the Breast, Estrogen, and Nutrition 2 (BEAN2) Study (b). NAF, nipple aspirate fluid.

Figure 1

Table 1 Scoring for World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) recommendations based on data from baseline FFQ (Number of women and percentages)

Figure 2

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of 275 premenopausal women from two intervention studies* (Number of premenopausal women and percentages; mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Table 3 Characteristics of women by adherence to World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations* (Number of women and percentages; mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Mean biomarker levels and standard errors by World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) score. (a) Serum C-reactive protein (mg/l, Ptrend< 0·01), (b) serum α-tocopherol (μg/ml, Ptrend< 0·01) and (c) urinary F2-isoprostane (ng/l, Ptrend= 0·27). Missing data were recorded for (a) (n 23) and (b) (n 12). Ptrend values were computed using log-transformed biomarker levels.

Figure 5

Table 4 Characteristics of women by BMI category* (Mean values and standard deviations; number of women and percentages)