Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T18:13:00.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inconsistent with the data: Support for the CLASH model depends on the wrong kind of latitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Darren Burke
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Science Offices, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia darren.burke@newcastle.edu.au http://evolutionarycognition.org
Danielle Sulikowski
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Panorama Ave, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia dsulikowski@csu.edu.au www.comparativecognition.com
Ian Stephen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia ian.stephen@mq.edu.au http://humansciences.mq.edu.au/psychology/psychology_staff/psychology_academic_staff/ian_stephen
Robert Brooks
Affiliation:
Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. rob.brooks@unsw.edu.au www.robbrooks.net

Abstract

We argue that the CLASH model makes a number of questionable assumptions about the harshness and unpredictability of low-latitude environments, calling into question the life history strategy approach used, and that it is inconsistent with more nuanced global patterns of violence. We suggest an alternative account for less violence at high latitudes, based on a greater need for cooperation.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable