Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T23:28:03.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological models of art reception must be empirically grounded

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Marcos Nadal ,
Oshin Vartanian  and
Martin Skov
Marcos Nadal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 07122. marcos.nadal@uib.es
Oshin Vartanian
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada. oshinv1@mac.com
Martin Skov
Affiliation:
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen 2650, Denmark. martins@drcmr.dk Center for Decision Neuroscience, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen 2000, Denmark.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We commend Menninghaus et al. for tackling the role of negative emotions in art reception. However, their model suffers from shortcomings that reduce its applicability to empirical studies of the arts: poor use of evidence, lack of integration with other models, and limited derivation of testable hypotheses. We argue that theories about art experiences should be based on empirical evidence.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e371
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barrett, L. F. & Bar, M. (2009) See it with feeling: Affective predictions during object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364:1325–34.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N. & Gross, J. J. (2007) The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology 58:373–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. F. & Wager, T. (2006) The structure of emotion: Evidence from the neuroimaging of emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15:79–85.Google Scholar
Gerger, G., Leder, H. & Kremer, A. (2014) Context effects on emotional and aesthetic evaluations of artworks and IAPS pictures. Acta Psychologica 151(1):174–83. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.008.Google Scholar
Kesner, L. (2014) The predictive mind and the experience of visual art work. Frontiers in Psychology 5:1417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martindale, C. (2001) How does the brain compute aesthetic experience? The General Psychologist 36:25–35.Google Scholar
Reber, R., Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(4):364–82. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.Google Scholar
Sachs, M. E., Damasio, A. & Habibi, A. (2015) The pleasures of sad music: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:404. Available at: http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvia, P. J. (2009) Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3(1):48–51. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014632.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2012) Human emotions and aesthetic experience: An overview of empirical aesthetics. In: Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience, ed. Shimamura, A. & Palmer, S. E., pp. 250–75. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. K. (2014) The museum effect. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L. (2013) From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 7(3):265–75. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0030872.Google Scholar
Van de Cruys, S. & Wagemans, J. (2011) Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art. Iperception 2(9):1035–62. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1068/i0466aap.Google ScholarPubMed
Wagner, V., Menninghaus, W., Hanich, J. & Jacobsen, T. (2014) Art schema effects on affective experience: The case of disgusting images. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8(2):120–29. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036126.Google Scholar
Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F. & Barsalou, L. W. (2013) Neural evidence that human emotions share core affective properties. Psychological Science 24:947–56.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(2, Pt.2):1–27. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025848.Google Scholar