Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:35:12.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diet, exercise and gut mucosal immunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2010

Roxana Valdés-Ramos*
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Graduate Studies on Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico
Beatriz E. Martínez-Carrillo
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Graduate Studies on Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, D.F.Mexico
Irma I. Aranda-González
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Graduate Studies on Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico
Ana Laura Guadarrama
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Graduate Studies on Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico
Rosa Virgen Pardo-Morales
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Graduate Studies on Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico
Patricia Tlatempa
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Graduate Studies on Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico
Rosa A. Jarillo-Luna
Affiliation:
Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, D.F.Mexico
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Roxana Valdés-Ramos, fax +52 722 2174142 extension 122, email rvaldesr@uaemex.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diet and exercise are primary strategies recommended for the control of the obesity epidemic. Considerable attention is being paid to the effect of both on the immune system. However, little research has been done on the effect of diet, nutrients or exercise on the mucosal immune system. The gastrointestinal tract (gut) is not only responsible for the entry of nutrients into the organism, but also for triggering the primary immune response to orally ingested antigens. The gut-associated lymphoid tissue contains a large amount of immune cells, disseminated all along the intestine in Peyer's patches and lamina propria. Specific nutrients or their combinations, as well as the microflora, are capable of modulating the immune system through cell activation, production of signalling molecules or gene expression. We have observed an increase in T-cells as well as a decrease in B-cells from Peyer's patches, induced by diets high in fats or carbohydrates in Balb/c mice. It has also been demonstrated that exercise modulates the immune system, where moderate levels may improve its function by increasing the proliferation of lymphocytes from various sites, including gut-associated lymphoid tissue, whereas exhaustive acute exercise may cause immunosuppression. High-fat diets combined with exercise are able to induce an increase in CD3+ lymphocytes due to increased CD8+ cells and a decrease in B-cells. Explanations and consequences of the effects of diet and exercise on the gut mucosal immunity are still being explored.

Type
3rd International Immunonutrition Workshop
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Abbreviation:
gut

gastrointestinal tract

The present obesity epidemic and its related diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension and CVD, among others, have forced the focus of science, and particularly nutrition, on the need to change the lifestyles of the world's population. The recommended changes refer specifically to decreases or adjustments to the diet as well as increases in physical activity, aiming to decrease body weight and improve general health. However, these are only visible consequences and it is to be expected that many other systems will also be affected. It is well known that specific nutrients act as immune-modulators triggering differential responses by adequacy, deficiency or excess; physical activity has also been found to modulate the immune system. However, not much is known about the combined effect of diet and exercise particularly in relation to the mucosal immune system. Here, we review the information related to the gastrointestinal tract (gut) mucosal immune system.

The gut mucosa

The gut is the largest internal surface in touch with micro-organisms, starting with the oral cavity, which is considered the most heavily infected site. Due to the large mucosal surface of the gut, it is highly prone to infections, containing a great amount of secondary lymphoid tissue, such as the tonsils, adenoids, appendix and Peyer's patches (found particularly in the intestine). Tonsil and adenoid immunity are directed specifically to respiratory infections, while appendix and Peyer's patches are specific for gastrointestinal infections(Reference Neish1).

The intestine has a surface of approximately 300 m2, dedicated to digestion and absorption of nutrients and mostly any other cell or substance that passes through, including micro-organisms and antigens(Reference Ramiro-Puig, Perez-Cano and Casellote2). Gut-associated lymphoid tissue is the largest lymphoid organ in the human body, containing about 70% of all immune cells (106 lymphocytes per gram of tissue). It can be divided into inductor sites, including Peyer's patches, mesenteric nodes and isolated lymphoid follicles; and effector sites such as lamina propria and epithelium(Reference Forchielli and Walker3Reference Eberl5).

Once absorbed, antigens are transported at the inductor sites to macrophages, B-cells and dendritic cells for antigen presentation, migrating through lymph vessels to the nearest lymph node, where they stimulate T-cells to regulate the immune response(Reference Brandtzaeg, Kiyono and Pabst6). Although gut-associated lymphoid tissue cells are peripherally disseminated, they always return to the gut(Reference Garside, Millington and Smith7). Once T-helper cells have been activated, they differentiate into T-helper cell type 1, T-helper cell type 2 or the recently described T-helper cell type 17, based on their cytokine production(Reference Ramiro-Puig, Perez-Cano and Castellote8).

The most important inductor sites are Peyer's patches, which are easily identifiable conglomerates of lymphoid follicles in the intestine, separated from the lumen by epithelial cells known as M cells, under which are found dendritic cells and macrophages. They have a B-cell follicle with a germinal centre surrounded by T-cell areas, very similar to the anatomy of a lymph node including only efferent vessels. The follicles in Peyer's patches have secretory IgA producing plasma cells(Reference Ramiro-Puig, Perez-Cano and Castellote8, Reference Nagler-Anderson9). Peyer's patches are essential for the induction and regulation of intestinal IgA immunity against oral antigens as IgA isotype switching occurs only in the organized mucosa-associated lymphoid organs(Reference Hashizume, Togowa and Nochi10, Reference Shikina, Hiroi and Iwatani11).

The lamina propria is an effector site found between the epithelium and the mucosa muscularis, which contains mature IgA producing plasmatic cells, T-helper cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and mastocytes; these are in constant differentiation, renovation and migration(Reference Brandtzaeg, Kiyono and Pabst6, Reference Ramiro-Puig, Perez-Cano and Castellote8).

Thus the gut, apart from being the point of entry for nutrients is a very important site for triggering the primary immune response; modifying its characteristics or function can alter the whole systemic response not only to orally ingested antigens, but also to any other type of antigen.

Nutrition and the immune system

The relation between nutrition and the immune system has been studied for a long time. It has been demonstrated that specific nutrients or nutrient combinations may affect the immune system through the activation of cells, modification in the production of signalling molecules and gene expression. This is not only a systemic effect, but is also found and may be even greater in the mucosal immune system(Reference Field12, Reference Sanderson13).

For example, much attention has been given to the effect of dietary lipids on lymphocyte proliferation, cytokine production, phagocytic activity, adhesion molecule expression and natural killer cell activity. Various authors have concluded that modification of n-3 and n-6 PUFA intakes may be beneficial for the immune system through the regulation of inflammatory mediators such as eicosanoids, which are produced as part of the normal immune response(Reference De Pablo, Puertollano and de Cienfuegos14Reference Calder16).

With respect to the gut mucosal immunity there is an apparent effect of signalling molecule expression in the epithelial cells induced by changes in the lumen caused by diet or flora. For example, bacterial fermentation induces the production of SCFA, increasing IL-8 production and decreasing chemotaxis(Reference Sanderson17, Reference Sanz, Santacruz and De Palma18). The gut epithelium is capable of distinguishing between pathogenic and non-pathogenic flora. Apparently, macrophages in the lamina propria switch off the primary inflammatory response triggered by the epithelium; in some cases transforming growth factor-β may be initiating the tolerance process against non-pathogenic bacteria(Reference Schiffrin and Blum19). It has been demonstrated in animal models that the presence of intestinal flora modulates B- and T-cell proliferation in Peyer's patches and mesenteric lymph nodes in a murine model(Reference Hrncir, Stepankova and Kozakova20).

Our group has studied the effect of 9 weeks of feeding diets high in fat or carbohydrate on T-cells from lamina propria in Balb/c mice, where we found that both diets increase production of IL-2, IL-5 and TNFα, although the high-fat diet decreased total T-cell population and the high-carbohydrate diet increased this type of cells(Reference Martínez-Carrillo, Jarillo-Luna and Rivera-Aguilar21). The same model was used to study the effect of diet on B and IgA+ lymphocytes in lamina propria and Peyer's patches. High-fat and high-carbohydrate diets decreased CD19+ cells and increased IgA+ cells in both types of tissues(Reference Martínez-Carrillo, Jarillo-Luna and Rivera-Aguilar22). These results (Table 1) indicate that dietary modifications are capable of modulating the local immune response in the gut mucosa.

Table 1. Cell populations determined by flow cytometry in peripheral blood, lamina propria and Peyer's patches in Balb/c mice on a high-fat or high-carbohydrate dietFootnote *

(Mean values (%) and standard deviations)

* Statistical analysis by ANOVA.

It is clear that diet as a whole, as well as specific nutrients, may be acting as immunomodulators at all levels. We hypothesise that this is more so at the gut mucosa, due to its closeness in the process of absorption.

Obesity and the immune system

Obesity has been associated with immunosuppression due to an increased susceptibility to infections, increased allergic reactions and poor antibody response to vaccines. These effects are most probably induced by imbalances in the production of obesity-associated hormones, such as adipocytokines, which may be acting as immunomodulators. One of the main features of obesity related to the immune system is the low-grade inflammation as measured by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6, which are produced by adipocytes as well as by other cell types and are present in various levels of the gut(Reference Coppack23).

Leptin is an anorexigenic protein with a structure that places it in the family of the cytokines, produced by adipose tissue proportional to adipose tissue mass. Infectious processes and inflammation cause an increase in leptin synthesis, whereas its deficiency is associated with high susceptibility to infections and an imbalance in cytokine production. Leptin regulates T-cell responses by enhancing TNFα, IL-6 and IL-12 synthesis, thus polarizing the response towards a T-helper cell type 1 pattern, apparently by acting on the long isoform of its own receptor expressed on T lymphocytes(Reference Faggioni, Feingold and Grunefeld24Reference Siegmund, Sennello and Jones-Carson26).

Ghrelin is an orexigenic neuropeptide produced by adipose tissue, capable of inducing a significant increase in peripheral blood lymphocytes as well as the percentage of cytotoxic lymphocytes in mice. It is a sensor of negative energy balance, reduced during obesity and increased by energy restriction. This hormone also regulates immune function by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and promoting thymopoiesis during ageing(Reference Wu and Kral27, Reference Dixit28).

Obese patients, particularly those with visceral fat accumulation, have reduced plasma levels of adiponectin, the most abundant and adipose-specific adipocytokine. Evidence suggests that adiponectin has anti-atherogenic, anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic properties, because low levels of adiponectin in obesity promote T lymphocyte chemotaxis(Reference Okamoto, Kihara and Funahashi29, Reference Okamoto, Folco and Minami30).

On the other hand, recent research has shown that the gut microbiota may be regulating obesity by increasing energy uptake and storage from the diet, modifying peripheral metabolism and synthesising gut peptides that control energy homeostasis. These changes in the flora may be caused either by diet, by the use of antibiotics or even by the intake of probiotics(Reference Reinhardt, Reigstad and Bäckhed31Reference Raoult34).

The obesity epidemic has promoted the evaluation of all kinds of diets with combination of energy intake and macronutrient content for weight reduction. These diets or regimes may modify gut metabolism including the immune system, through specific effects of nutrients on the gut mucosa or by altering the environment of the microbiota.

Exercise and the immune system

Physical activity is any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure, i.e. activities that are beyond an individual's daily routine of sitting, standing and walking up stairs. Exercise has been defined as a subset of physical activity that is planned, structured, repetitive and with the objective of improving or maintaining health(Reference Caspersen, Powell and Christenson35). It is also important to consider the dose, which is the total amount of energy expended, whereas intensity is the rate of energy expenditure. Thus, physical activity is classified as sedentary, moderate or vigorous and its effects depend on the total amount of time spent in each type(Reference Thompson, Buchner and Piña36). Exercise can also be classified as acute, which refers to a single bout of high-intensity exercise, or as chronic, meaning regular training or practice of a moderate-intensity exercise. Both types of exercise have different metabolic effects; in the case of insulin resistance, both are helpful, but through different mechanisms. On the other hand, the effect of acute exercise on immune cell counts is large, but the effects on the cell function are relatively small(Reference Henriksen37, Reference Gabriel and Kinderman38).

The most recent worldwide guidelines for the control of overweight and obesity, as well as for the maintenance of health and well-being, include physical activity at various levels of intensity and duration. The direct relationship between diet and physical activity for the control of weight has been well established. Any activity additional to the resting metabolic rate will utilize the body's fat stores at certain points, and so an increase in energy expenditure will be useful to maintain body weight or even reduce it. Some exercise researchers even propose that physical activity is more important than dietary modifications(Reference Redinger39).

The extensive promotion of physical activity has increased research on its effect on various metabolic systems. The immune system is no exception and a whole research area has emerged as ‘exercise immunology’(Reference Smith40).

During acute exercise, blood leucocyte populations, as well as cytokine concentrations, increase, whereas after the exercise, lymphocytes decrease. Neutrophil functions such as adherence, chemotaxis, phagocytosis and oxidative burst increase with moderate exercise. However, chemotaxis and degranulation are reduced with acute exercise. With respect to repetitive bouts of acute exercise, the information is controversial and the effect is apparently related to the intensity of the exercise and the duration of rest between sessions(Reference Pedersen and Hoffman-Goetz41). Exercise training has been demonstrated to improve macrophage function(Reference Kizaki, Takemasa and Sakurai42).

The regular practice of moderate exercise has been found to enhance vaccination through a better CD4+ T-cell proliferative response in a murine model(Reference Rogers, Zharoff and Hance43). It has been suggested that regular exercise induces TNFα suppression due to the production of IL-6 and other anti-inflammatory cytokines when muscle contraction occurs, and this also promotes lypolysis and fat oxidation(Reference Petersen and Pedersen44).

With respect to mucosal immunity, most of the research has been done in the respiratory tract mucosa, particularly measuring secretory IgA in saliva. Most researchers conclude that acute and high-intensity chronic exercise causes immunosuppression, decreasing secretory IgA concentrations that might also be related to the increase in respiratory infections immediately after competitions in athletes(Reference Gleeson and Pyne45Reference Shepard47).

Information on the effect of physical activity on the gut indicates that acute exercise may cause transient diarrhoea and that continuous moderate exercise may protect against colon cancer, diverticulosis, gastrointestinal haemorrhage and inflammatory bowel; however, the mechanisms for this effect are not well understood(Reference Peters and de Vries48, Reference Warburton, Nicol and Bredin49).

Not much information is available at this point on the effect of exercise or physical activity on adipokine secretion and the available information relates mainly to adiponectin than to any other adipokine.

In a Japanese study of obese young female subjects, high levels of leptin and TNFα and lower levels of adiponectin were inverted with the exercise training programme(Reference Teruhiko, Isao and Masami50). On the other hand, exercise in children did not show improvements in C-reactive protein, IL-6, TNFα, adiponectin, leptin, or resistin(Reference Kelly, Steinberger and Olson51). In a combined protocol of diet and exercise in men, only diet had a significant positive effect on adiponectin, due to a reduction in fat mass(Reference Rokling-Andersen, Reseland and Veierød52). Adiponectin levels showed an improvement in obese adolescent girls only with a combination of exercise and diet(Reference Ounis, Elloumi and Amri53).

There is much evidence indicating that recommended (between 30 and 60 min/d) levels of exercise improve systemic immune response. However, there is not much information on its effects on gut mucosal immunity, although it most probably exerts an important benefit.

Combined effects of diet and exercise on the immune system

A study of obese men with or without metabolic syndrome, who were placed on a high-fibre, low-fat diet with daily aerobic exercise, showed improvement in traditional metabolic syndrome markers, but more importantly, a reduction in inflammation, leucocyte–endothelial interactions, adhesion and monocyte chemotactic activity, as well as leucocyte production of matrix metalloproteinase-9, independent of weight loss(Reference Roberts, Won and Pruthi54).

Apparently exercise is capable of inducing IL-6 gene expression in adipose tissue as well as in muscle, thus enhancing fat metabolism and increasing the need of NEFA post-exercise, and this effect was significantly reduced by the intake of carbohydrates(Reference Keller, Keller and Marshal55). It has also been shown that the exercise-induced increase in leucocytes, neutrophils and monocytes may be decreased by carbohydrate intake, as well as the production of C-reactive protein, cortisol and IL-6(Reference Scharhag, Meyer and Auracher56).

On the other hand, supplementation with fish-oil (n-3 fatty acids) together with moderate exercise apparently does not modify neutrophil chemotaxis or adherence, nor cytokine production by T-cells or monocytes, but does reduce reactive oxygen species production by neutrophils(Reference Hill, Worthley and Murphy57). A study of various levels of dietary fat intake showed that maintaining an adequate percentage of fat in the diet helps control the exercise-induced inflammatory state in healthy subjects(Reference Meksawan, Venkatraman and Awad58).

A mouse model with voluntary exercise or dietary modification showed that energy restriction enhanced natural killer cell function and reduced mitogen-induced T-cell proliferation, whereas exercise had the opposite effect, increasing T-cell proliferation and cytokine production from Peyer's patches(Reference Rogers, Berrigan and Zaharoff59).

In a study where rats were placed on a high-fat or soyabean-supplemented diet with or without exercise (swimming), spleen T-cytotoxic (CD8+) cells were higher in the soyabean group and interferon-γ was increased with the soyabean and exercise group(Reference Kwon, Hwang and Kim60).

In order to evaluate the effect of moderate exercise on gut mucosal immunity, we have done experiments on Balb/c mice with high fat or high carbohydrate diets, with 20 min swimming sessions on 5 d per week, starting at weaning (21 d) up to 12 weeks of life. Partial preliminary results (Fig. 1) on cell phenotype of Peyer's patches show that the fat diet with exercise increases total T-cell percentage, due to an increase in CD3+/CD8+ cells. With respect to B-cells, we observed a decrease in the exercise groups (II Aranda-González, BE Martínez-Carrillo, RA Jarillo-Luna and R Valdés-Ramos, unpublished results).

Fig. 1. Peyer's patches lymphocyte sub-populations by flow cytometry. Values represent mean (sd) of each experimental group (n 6). Statistical differences by ANOVA with post-test Tukey comparing all four groups, significance for selected columns is as follows: ○, P=0·023; •, P=0·038; ▵, P=0·0001; ▴P=0·0001; □, P=0·002; ▪, P=0·036; ×, P=0·007.

Conclusions

It is clear that most of the research undertaken to identify the relationship between physical activity and diet with the immune system has focused on the systemic effects and particularly on the inflammatory processes associated with the obesity epidemic and its co-morbidities. However, since the gut is the point of entry of all nutrients and a great amount of antigens, and is the home of a great number of beneficial bacteria, we consider that it is very important to study the direct changes on the gut mucosal immunity caused by all the novel interventions for the control of obesity, CVD, diabetes mellitus and hypertension among others. Research on the gut mucosa of human beings is not an easy task, and so we have developed an animal model that is helpful in learning how these interventions act directly on the local immune system and subsequently on the whole organism.

Exercise modifies the immune system depending on the type, duration and intensity, as well as dietary modifications in the form of total energy restriction, variation in the macronutrient content or the intake of probiotic foods that may reinstate the adequate balance of the gut microbiota. Combined interventions of all three components might also be helpful in the control of this worldwide epidemic. There is still much research to be done in order to find the best combination.

Figure 2 summarizes the possible relationships that may be acting on the well-being of the gut mucosal immunity.

Fig. 2. Factors affecting the gut mucosal immune system. Dietary components affect cytokine secretion; changes in adipose tissue as well as different types of exercise exert modulating effects on cytokine and adipokine secretion as well as specific cellular functions; microflora may also be acting on some components of the immune system and the intake of probiotics may be acting to maintain the balance at this level.

Acknowledgements

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this publication. This work was funded by Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México & Fondo Mixto COMECyT/CONACyT. The research protocol of the results presented here was approved by the Institutional Committee on Research and Ethics for Animal Research. R.V.R., B.E.M.C., R.V.P.M., P.T. and R.A.J.L. participated in the experimental portion as well as the writing and revision of the document. I.I.A.G. and A.L.G. participated in the experimental portion of the work described in this paper.

References

1.Neish, AS (2009) Microbes in gastrointestinal health and disease. Gastroenterology 136, 6580.Google Scholar
2.Ramiro-Puig, E, Perez-Cano, FJ, Casellote, C et al. (2008) EL intestino: pieza clave del sisetema inmunitario (The intestine key piece for the immune system). Rev Esp Enferm Dig 100, 2934.Google Scholar
3.Forchielli, ML & Walker, WA (2005) The role of gut-associated lymphoid tissues and mucosal defence. Br J Nutr 93, Suppl 1, S41S48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Hanaway, P (2006) Balance of flora, GALT and mucosal integrity. Altern Ther Health Med 12, 5260.Google Scholar
5.Eberl, G (2005) Inducible lymphoid tissues in the adult gut; recapitulation of a fetal development pathway? Nat Rev Immunol 5, 413420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Brandtzaeg, P, Kiyono, H, Pabst, R et al. (2008) Terminology: nomenclature of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Mucos Immunol 1, 3137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Garside, P, Millington, O & Smith, KM (2004) The anatomy of mucosal immune responses. Ann NY Acad Sci 1029, 9–15.Google Scholar
8.Ramiro-Puig, A, Perez-Cano, FJ, Castellote, C et al. (2008) The bowel: a key component of the immune system. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 100, 2934.Google Scholar
9.Nagler-Anderson, C (2001) Man the barrier! Strategic defense in the intestinal mucosa. Nat Rev Immunol 1, 5967.Google Scholar
10.Hashizume, T, Togowa, A, Nochi, T et al. (2008) Peyer's patches are requiered for intestinal immunoglobulin A responses to Salmonella spp. Infect Immun 76, 927934.Google Scholar
11.Shikina, T, Hiroi, T, Iwatani, K et al. (2004) IgA class switch occurs in the organized nasopharynx- and gut-associated lymphoid tissue, but not in the diffuse lamina propria of airways and gut. J Immunol 172, 62596264.Google Scholar
12.Field, CJ (2000) Use of T-cell function to determine the effect of physiologically active food components. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 6 Suppl 1, S720S725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Sanderson, IR (2007) Dietary modulation of GALT. J Nutr 137, Suppl 11, S2557S2562.Google Scholar
14.De Pablo, MA, Puertollano, MA & de Cienfuegos, Á (2002) Biological and clinical significance of lipids as modulators of immune system functions. Clin Diag Lab Immunol 9, 945950.Google ScholarPubMed
15Sweeney, B, Puri, P & Reen, DJ (2005) Modulation of immune cell function by polyunsaturated fatty acids. Pediatr Surg Int 21, 335340.Google Scholar
16.Calder, P (2006) n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and inflammatory diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 83, Suppl, S1505S1519.Google Scholar
17.Sanderson, IR (2001) Nutritional factors and immune function of gut epithelium. Proc Nutr Soc 60, 443447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Sanz, Y, Santacruz, A & De Palma, G (2008) Insights into the roles of gut microbes in obesity. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 829101 [Epublication ahead of print 3 December 2008; doi:10.1155/2008/829101].Google ScholarPubMed
19.Schiffrin, EJ & Blum, S (2002) Interactions between the microbiota and the intestinal mucosa. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, Suppl 3, S60S64.Google Scholar
20.Hrncir, T, Stepankova, R, Kozakova, H et al. (2008) Gut microbiota and lipopolysaccharide content of the diet influence development of regulatory T cells: studies in germ-free mice. BMC Immunol 9, 65.Google Scholar
21.Martínez-Carrillo, BE, Jarillo-Luna, RA, Rivera-Aguilar, V et al. (2009) The effect of a high fat or high carbohydrate diet on the immune system of young Balb/c mice. Abstract. 3rd International Immunonutrition Workshop, 2124 October 2009, Girona, Spain.Google Scholar
22.Martínez-Carrillo, BE, Jarillo-Luna, RA, Rivera-Aguilar, V et al. (2009) Dietary modification of B lymphocytes. Abstract. 3rd International Immunonutrition Workshop. 2124 October 2009, Girona, Spain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Coppack, SW (2001) Pro-inflammatory cytokines and adipose tissue. Proc Nutr Soc 60, 349356.Google Scholar
24.Faggioni, R, Feingold, KR & Grunefeld, C (2001) Leptin regulation of the immune response and the immunodeficiency of malnutrition. FASEB J 15, 25652571.Google Scholar
25.Loffreda, S, Yang, SQ, Lin, HZ et al. (1998) Leptin regulates proinfolammatory immune response. FASEB J 12, 5765.Google Scholar
26.Siegmund, B, Sennello, JA, Jones-Carson, J et al. (2004) Leptin receptor expression on T lymphocytes modulates chronic intestinal inflammation in mice. Gut 53, 965967.Google Scholar
27.Wu, JT & Kral, JG (2004) Ghrelin: integrative neuroendocrine peptide in health and disease. Ann Surg 239, 464474.Google Scholar
28.Dixit, VD (2008) Adipose-immune interactions during obesity and caloric restricition: reciprocal mechanisms regulating immunity and health span. J Leukoc Biol 84, 882892.Google Scholar
29.Okamoto, Y, Kihara, S, Funahashi, T et al. (2006) Adiponectin: a key adipocytokine in metabolic syndrome. Clin Sci (Lond) 110, 267278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Okamoto, Y, Folco, EJ, Minami, M et al. (2008) Adiponectin inhibits the production of CXC receptor 3 chemokine ligands in macrophages and reduces T-lymphocyte recruitment in atherogenesis. Circ Res 103, 218225.Google Scholar
31.Reinhardt, C, Reigstad, CS & Bäckhed, F (2009) Intestinal microbiota during infancy and its implications for obesity. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 48, 249256.Google Scholar
32.DiBaise, JK, Zhang, H, Crowell, MD et al. (2008) Gut microbiota and its possible relationship with obesity. Mayo Clin Proc 83, 460469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Cani, PD & Delzenne, NM (2009) The role of the gut microbiota in energy metabolism and metabolic disease. Curr Pharm Des 15, 15461558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Raoult, D (2008) Obesity pandemics and the modification of digestive bacterial flora. J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27, 631634.Google Scholar
35.Caspersen, CJ, Powell, KH & Christenson, GM (1985) Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Pub Health Rep 100, 126131.Google Scholar
36.Thompson, PD, Buchner, D, Piña, IL et al. (2003) Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Circulation 107, 31093116.Google Scholar
37.Henriksen, EJ (2002) Effects of acute exercise and exercise training on insulin resistance. J Appl Physiol 93, 788796.Google Scholar
38.Gabriel, H & Kinderman, W (1997) The acute immune response to exercise: what does it mean? Int J Sports Med 18, Suppl 1 S28S45.Google Scholar
39.Redinger, RN (2009) Is enhanced energy utilization the answer to prevention of excessive adiposity? J Ky Med Assoc 107, 211217.Google ScholarPubMed
40.Smith, JA (1995) Guidelines, standards and perspective in exercise immunology. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27, 497506.Google Scholar
41.Pedersen, BK & Hoffman-Goetz, L (2000) Exercise and the immune system: regulation, integration and adaptation. Physiol Rev 80, 10551081.Google Scholar
42.Kizaki, T, Takemasa, T, Sakurai, T et al. (2008) Adaptation of macrophages to exercise training improves innate immunity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 372, 152156.Google Scholar
43.Rogers, CJ, Zharoff, DA, Hance, KW et al. (2008) Exercise enhances vaccine-induced antigen-specific T cell responses. Vaccine 26, 54075415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Petersen, AMW & Pedersen, BK (2005) The anti-inflammatory effect of exercise. J Appl Physiol 98, 11541162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Gleeson, M & Pyne, DB (2000) Exercise effects on mucosal immunity. Immunol Cell Biol 78, 536544.Google Scholar
46.Moreira, A, Arsati, F, Ramos-Cury, P et al. (2008) The impact of a 17-day training period for an international championship on mucosal immune parameters in top-level basketball players and staff members. Eur J Oral Sci 116, 431437.Google Scholar
47.Shepard, RJ (2000) Overview of the epidemiology of exercise immunology. Immunol Cell Biol 78, 485495.Google Scholar
48.Peters, HPF & de Vries, WR (2001) Potential benefits and hazards of physical activity and exercise on the gastrointestinal tract. Gut 48, 435439.Google Scholar
49.Warburton, DER, Nicol, CW & Bredin, SSD (2006) Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 174, 801809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50.Teruhiko, K, Isao, K & Masami, M (2006) Effect of exercise on circulating adipokine levels in obese young women. Endocrinol J 53, 189195.Google Scholar
51.Kelly, A, Steinberger, J, Olson, T et al. (2007) In the absence weight loss, exercise training does not improve adipokines or oxidative stress in overweight children. Metabolism 56, 10051009.Google Scholar
52.Rokling-Andersen, MH, Reseland, JE, Veierød, MB et al. (2007) Effects of long-term exercise and diet intervention on plasma adipokine concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 12931301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53.Ounis, OB, Elloumi, M, Amri, M et al. (2008) Impact of diet, exercise and diet combined with exercise programs on plasma lipoprotein and adiponectin levels in obese girls. J Sports Med Sci Med 7, 437445.Google ScholarPubMed
54.Roberts, CK, Won, D, Pruthi, S et al. (2006) Effect of a short-term diet and exercise intervention, MMP-9, and monocyte chemotactic activity in men with metabolic syndrome factors. J Appl Physiol 100, 16571665.Google Scholar
55.Keller, C, Keller, P, Marshal, S et al. (2003) IL-6 gene expression in human adipose tissue in response to exercise – effect of carbohydrate ingestion. J Physiol 550, 927931.Google Scholar
56.Scharhag, J, Meyer, T, Auracher, M et al. (2006) Effect of a graded carbohydrate supplementation on the immune response in cycling. Med Sci Sport Exer 38, 286292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57.Hill, AM, Worthley, C, Murphy, KJ et al. (2007) n-3 fatty acid supplementation and regular moderate exercise: differential effects of a combined intervention on neutrophil function. Br J Nutr 98, 300309.Google Scholar
58.Meksawan, K, Venkatraman, JT, Awad, AB et al. (2004) Effect of dietary fat intake and exercise on inflammatory mediators of the immune system in sedentary men and women. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 331340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59.Rogers, CJ, Berrigan, D, Zaharoff, DA et al. (2008) Energy restriction and exercise differentially enhance components of systemic and mucosal immunity in mice. J Nutr 138, 115122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60.Kwon, DK, Hwang, KH, Kim, YK et al. (2008) Effects of swimming exercise and soybean supplementation on the immune functions of rats fed a high-fat diet. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 35, 638642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Cell populations determined by flow cytometry in peripheral blood, lamina propria and Peyer's patches in Balb/c mice on a high-fat or high-carbohydrate diet*(Mean values (%) and standard deviations)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Peyer's patches lymphocyte sub-populations by flow cytometry. Values represent mean (sd) of each experimental group (n 6). Statistical differences by ANOVA with post-test Tukey comparing all four groups, significance for selected columns is as follows: ○, P=0·023; •, P=0·038; ▵, P=0·0001; ▴P=0·0001; □, P=0·002; ▪, P=0·036; ×, P=0·007.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Factors affecting the gut mucosal immune system. Dietary components affect cytokine secretion; changes in adipose tissue as well as different types of exercise exert modulating effects on cytokine and adipokine secretion as well as specific cellular functions; microflora may also be acting on some components of the immune system and the intake of probiotics may be acting to maintain the balance at this level.